BILLS TO CREATE A FREEDOM COMMISSION AND FREEDOM ACADEMY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP66B00403R000300200002-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 23, 2016
Document Release Date: 
February 5, 2014
Sequence Number: 
2
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
February 13, 1964
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP66B00403R000300200002-6.pdf337.27 KB
Body: 
1964 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/02/05: CIA-RDP66B00403R000300200002-6 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? APPENDIX ing's ears," Clymer recalled, "the Governor sadly admitted that his appointment was his 'big mistake.'" It was such fearlessness in the face of au- thority, Clymer said, that helped make the SalMa Journal a good newspaper under Aus- tin's leadership. SERVED AS CHAIRMAN Gov. John Anderson reappointed Austin to a 4-year term on the board of regents in 1962. He was the chairman in 1961. Austin, an honor graduate of the Univer- sity of Wisconsin, is a past president of the Xansas Associated Press and is a trustee of the William Allen White Foundation. In receiving the citation, Austin said of his experience with White:? "You learned to write by writing. You learned to report by excavating the facts and putting them together accurately. You were a showman and a gossip. You lived by surprise. You also were a historian devoted to truth, however dark the glass. "You were a booster and a critic, a father confessor * * * a political huekster and a statesman, an errand boy and a prophet. "But first of all you were a reporter, using your legs, your eyes, and your brains and writing the Kansas language." The annual meeting of the White Founda- tion is held on February 10, the birthday of the famed editor of the Emporia Gazette who died in 1944. Repair lob Needed EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. JAMES C. AUCHINCLOSS OF NEW JERSEY IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 13, 1964 Mr. AUCHINCLOSS. Mr. Speaker, while I am definitely in favor of ade- quate legislation strengthening the civil rights of all our citizens, I must confess that I voted for H.R. 7152 with very, little enthusiasm. Judging from conversation with my colleagues, I learned that many had a 'similar feeling. This lack of enthusiasm was due very largely to the fact that the measure was brought to the floor of the House without the careful and penetrating study which such an important and all-embracing measure deserves and demands. Fur- thermore, it gives to the President and others very broad authority that could be abused to the everlasting detriment of our Nation if exercised by irresponsible or politically minded people. I feel confident and, indeed, I hope my confidence is well founded, that before taking final action on it the Senate will give this measure the study and pene- trating analysis which it deserves. My thoughts in this respect are well ex- pressed and summed up in the attached editorial which appeared in the Evening Star of Tuesday, February 11, entitled "Repair Job Needed." This editorial analyzes the bill passed by the House in a constructive manner with a spirit-of helpfulness, and it appears to me it is based on unassailable foundations. The editorial follows: , REPAIR JOB NEEDED The House now has passed whet has aptly been described as the most far-reaching civil rights bill ever put before Congress. This is no exaggeration. And as enacted by the House, the bill is very much in need of an overhaul. The fact is that the bill?though new civil rights legislation is both desirable and neces- sary?did not receive anything like adequate consideration in the House. A few facts will illustrate the point. At present, there are 432 Members of the House. Every quorum call was answered by at least 400 Members. So the legislators were in attendance. But in votes taken on 21 issues affecting the bill, some of them of great importance, the aver- age was 131.7 against amendment and 64.6 in favor. Why did less than half of the House membership take part in the debate and in the votes on amendments? Simply because those who were against the bill or who wanted to modify it, Republican's as well as Democrats, knew they were beaten be- fore the first speech was made. They had no stomach for the fight and were more than willing to pass the battle on to the Senate, meanwhile trying to harvest a little partisan hay. In the Senate, where the steamroller tactics so effectively used in the House can- not be employed, the entire bill will receive the-careful consideration it deserves. This is proper. For a meaningful civil rights bill, when it becomes law, will have' a profound effect?not only in the South, but in other sections of the country as well. It is better to consider it with care now than to regret ill-advised action later on. There are three aspects of the House-ap- proved bill which we think are especially in need of repair work in the Senate. One is the failure of the bill to provide for jury trials in contempt proceedings except In title II, which concerns public accommo- dations. Critics asked why, for instance, was no jury trial provision contained in title III, relating to desegregation of public facilities. The answer was that defendants under this title generally would be public officials, and why give them jury trials? This is strange doctrine in legislation which is supposed to have some relationship to equal protection of the laws. Because a man is a public of- ficial does not make an indeterminate jail sentence at the hands of some arbitrary judge any more palatable?or equitable. We think that in all cases the jury trial provi- sions of the civil rights act of 1957 should be incorporated in this bill. Our second point concerns title VI, author- izing the cutoff of Federal funds as an ai to desegregation and fair treatment. This section vests an enormous power in the hands of the President and his subordi- nates. That it could be outrageously abused by a politically minded and irresponsible President is beyond question. The late Pres- ident Kennedy was asked at a press confer- ence last April about a Civil Rights Commis- sion recommendation that the President seek power to cut off or suspend Federal aid funds to States which fail to comply with the Con- stitution and the laws. Mr. Kennedy's an- swer was that it probably would be unwise to give the President that kind of power. Our feeling is that this section in the pending bill needs to be much more care- fully drawn. Funds can be cut off when there has been a finding that a person has been subjected to discrimination. But dis- crimination is not defined. What, precisely, does it mean? We agree with the observation that, under this section, the innocent are damned with the guilty if a Federal execu- tive agency can terminate Federal prcigrams in an entire State or in some geographical portion of a State because one citizen was 'discriminated' against by one State official or by a fellow citizen. There is the further point that in the South at least Negroes would probably suffer most when Federal aid is cut off. Our third objection goes to title VII, gen- erally known as the fair employment practices A661 section. This section hits hard at both management and union practices which keep . Negroes from obtaining jobs commensurate with their abilities. We wholeheartedly agree that legislation to accomplish this is needed. The pending proposal, however, is a draftsman's horror. Once again, key terms are not defined. No standards of evi- dence are set forth to guide the commission which would be created to administer the section. In the absence of standards, the commission might readily fall back on some form of quota system, which, by all means should be avoided. If this section is ac- cepted by the Senate, it should first be dras- tically overhauled, tightened up, and clarified. That this bill was railroaded through the House is beyond dispute. Representative MEADER, Republican, of Michigan, is a believer In civil rights and was a member of the Judiciary subcommittee which initiated work on this bill. At first, he says, the measure was seriously considered. Then a curidtis change took place. Without any de- bate in the subcommittee, three sections were suddenly added by the majority? FEPC, broader powers for the Attorney Gen- eral to intervene in suits, and a more sweep- ing public accommodations section. Then, on October 29, the full committee knocked out the language of the subcommittee bill. Substitute language, which was not drafted by the committee and the origin of which is not clear, was approved. Mr. MEADER first saw the completed draft when a copy was delivered to his home at 10:10 p.m. on the following Monday. The committee met the next morning at 10:30 and declared the bill not subject to amendment. That afternoon, following a recess necessitated by a meeting of the House, the bill was reported out. Fortunately, this sort of thing can't hap- pen in the Senate. The Senators will go over the bill line by line and clause by clause. We hope that an effective bill will be brought to a vote after full debate and passed with- out a filibuster. This will not happen, how- ever, unless modifications are accepted. If the' are not accepted, the only alternatives will be to invoke cloture or wear out the ob- jectors. We do not believe that either can be successful. 9 Bills To Create a Freedom Commission and Freedom Academy ,?) EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. EDWIN E. WILLIS OF LOUIS/ANA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 13, 1964 Mr. WILLIS. Mr. Speaker, I ask per- mission to place in the RECORD the text of a press release of the Committee on un-American Activities. This release reveals that the committee will hold hearings on February 18-20 on various bills to establish a Freedom Commission and Academy. Because the concept of a Freedom Academy has evoked consider- able interest, I thought that Members of the House might be interested in know- ing Of the hearings to be held .ney week. commrirt.k. ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, WASH- INGTON, D.C. Representative EDWIN E. Wn.ws, Democrat, of Louisiana, chairman of the House Com- mittee on un-American Activities, an- nounced today that on February 18, 19, and 20, 1964, the committee will hold public Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/02/05: CIA-RDP66B00403R000300200002-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/02/05: CIA-RDP66B00403R000300200002-6 A662 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD --- APPENDIX hearings on various bills to create a Freedom Commission and Freedom Academy which have been referred to the committee. The bills in question are: H.R. 352, intro- duced by Representative A. S. HzaLoNs, Jr.; H.R. 1617, introduced by Representative CHARLES S. Guasza; H.R. 5368, introduced by Representative HALE BOGGS; and H.R. 8320, introduged by Representative ROBERT TArr, Jr.; and H.R. 8757, introduced by Rep- resentative RICHARD SCHWEIKER. All persons desiring to present testimony on these bills during the February 18-20 hearings should contact Mr: F. J. McNamara, staff director, Committee on un-American Activities, room 226, Cannon Office Build- L., Washington, D.C. A Tribute to Our Flag EXTENSION OF REMARKS, OF' HON. WM. J. RANDALL OF MISSOURI IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 13, 1964 Mr. RANDALL. Mr. Speaker, in re- cent correspondence from a distinguished constituent, Mr. Thomas Quickel, who has enjoyed a career of prominence as a journalist, we received a tribute-to our flag created by John W. W. Cumming, rear admiral, U.S. Navy, retired, Ports- mouth, Va. In Admiral Cumming's let- ter to our constituent he requested any- one who might be interested to help dis- seminate the tribute, emphasizing he sought nothing fqr himself but only that it might help America. Admiral Cumming relates to Mr. Quickel that it was in 1942 while he was on convoy trips during World War II that most of the thoughts in the tribute came to his mind. He says he then tried to create something fundamental and basic with simplicity and yet would awaken response. Admiral Cumming is so eminently right when he says: Thoughts are things so to speak. Every- thing is born in the thought world before it is manifested or expressed in some form in the physical, material world. The admiral proceeds to say in his let- ter that? The symbolic significance of our flag draws its theme from our Declaration of Independ- ence, particularly from the glorious second paragraph of that immortal document. His comment upon the word "defend" is that the word was intentionally and purposely used. No sane person wants war just for the sake of war. In life situations or occasions are encountered ih which only-moral courage may be re- quired; some may require only physical courage; some may require both! We believe the "tribute" has a creed for all patriotic people to live by and our crystallization of thoughts about the flag are brought into an orderly theme. The tribute to the flag follows: A TRIBUTE TO OUR FLAG (By John W. W. Cumming, June 8, 1942) A salute to thee, Old Glory, the Stars and Stripes?our flag. Thou was born, June 14, 1777. Thy field of blue with 50 stars of white doth represent the Union of States while thy 13 stripes of red and white, the original colonies; the first States to form the United States of America, our country; but?thou art more. Thou are a silent symphony of red,- white and blue, the harmony of home and country composed by God, himself, the master of life, liberty, equality, and the pursuit of hap- piness?thy glorious theme. Thy canton of blue, like the firmament, displays now a galaxy, a constellation of bright shining stars in one of which each of us has a home, yet, every other star is like- wise a home for each of us?one for all and all for one?a perfect union. Thy stripes of white, six in number, em- blazon on high, the purity of purpose of creation by the the Almighty God whose omniscience and omnipotence, in 6 days, brought into being all there is, including earth and overall therein gave He dominion to man?and?God was pleased because all was good; thus was thy birth first planned. , Thy stripes of red, seven in number, one fOr each day of the week in which to render passionate, living, virile worship and service to the infinite, by man serving man in joy and sadness, in plenty and poverty, in health and sickness, regardless of cost, sacrifice, race, color, or creed; thus do our part by provi- dence planned. I salute thee, my flag, because thou dost symbolize all I hold most dear?God, home, country?and I will defend thee against all enemies; domestic and foreign. I salute thee. A Salute to the Future Farmers of America EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. WILLIAM H. NATCHER OF KENTUCKY IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 13, 1964 Mr. NATCHER. Mr. Speaker, the National Future Farmers of America Week will be observed this year from February 15 through 22, and it is with pleasure that I pay tribute to this or- ganization. The motto of the FFA, "Learning to do, doing to learn, earning to live, liv- ing to serve" emphasizes their purpose of preparing to become experienced, skilled farmers of the future. These young men fully deserve our support and encouragement in their endeavors as we will be depending upon them to utilize the rich, productive land that is our heritage. The training they are receiv- ing assures us that the future of Ameri- can agriculture will be An competent hands. The FFA organization is a young, growing one. Launched in Kansas City, Mo., on November 20, 1928 by 35 voca- tional agriculture students with their leaders, it has become the largest farm boy organization in the world. Approxi- mately 400,000 members participate in this intracurricular school group, com- posed of boys studying vocational agri- culture. Membership is voluntary, and the FFA has no political or religious af- filiations. The FFA trains young men to be not only farmers with skill and technical knowledge, but farmers with leadership February 13 experience 'and .potential. This aspect is realized through public speaking con- tests, parliamentary procedure followed in meetings, and officer training. These young men have a creed which envisions the path along which their leadership will take them. . I believe in the future of farming, with a faith born not of words but of deeds? achievements won by the present and past generations of farmers; in the promise of better days through better ways, even as the better things we now enjoy have come up to us from the struggles of former years. I believe in leadership from ourselves and respect from others. I believe that rural America can and will hold true to the best traditions in our national life and that I can exert an influence in my home and com- munity which will stand solid for my part in that inspiring task. This is the ultimate goal of the leader- ship expected of each of them. Recognizing that a continual supply of talent is needed in America's largest single industry, and that FFA, accom- panying and complimenting the voca- tional agriculture program, is a vital source of this talent, I salute the FFA chapters nokonly in the Second District of Kentucky, but all the FFA partici- pants throughout America for its invalu- able service. I wish them continued success and agree with their creed which states, "I believe in the future of farm-. ing." No Easy Answers to Wheat Problem EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. MARK ANDREWS OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, February 13, 1964 Mr. ANDREWS of North Dakota. Mr. Speaker, everyone in Congress is aware of the need for a sensible and realistic wheat program. Sometimes, however, we overlook the fact that one of our greatest assets in this world struggle against communism is the ability of our American farmers under our free en- terprise system to produce an abundance of that most important commodity? food. This can be our hole card in deal- ing with the Kremlin, but only if we are wise enough to use it in a positive way. I cannot help but feel that we are not winning the friendship of the man liv- ing in a grass hut with children suffer- ing from malnutrition who hears that America is telling her farmers to cut back on their production. In order to utilize this food in the world today, it would seem that any farm program that is -written must avoid export subsidies on wheat. The Fargo Forum, a Pulitzer Prize- winning newspaper in my First District of North 'Dakota, has been running a series of thought-provoking editorials on the agricultural situation. I would like to give the other Members of Con- gress the opportunity to read the Feb- ruary 9 editorial, entitled "There Are No Declassified and Approved For Release 2014/02/05: CIA-RDP66B00403R000300200002-6