CUBA - THE PERIL OF THE ANTILLES

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP65B00383R000200230011-5
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 6
• Document Creation Date: December 15, 2016
• Document Release Date: June 4, 2004
• Sequence Number: 11
• Publication Date: October 12, 1962
• Content Type: OPEN

pprOve -.For :A'se.'2004/Ct6123 :CIARDP65OG383ROOQ2OO23OO1 1-5
"'- 1962 . 11011ESSIONAL RECOSD.,--
? ,
if .0. commercial tenant? 9.1P,, -.for its future diminution and without
direct lop ,ot property or a combination of...- . being able t,o claim that it represents
such lOss oricT moving expenses in a Federal_ anything but a year-by-year holding op-
But noWheSe is there Compensation for a? progrsin, the maximumremains at $3,000., _
oration. I believe that there is no other.
commercial ten t's goodwill. program undertaken by the U.S. Govern-
an ,
- 'If I moved My store a few blocks away, ment which meets both of these negative
Where X didl4 knoW the, people in the area," criteria:
Lir, Unger 'said, "I couldn'tgiv,e Credit Jo. First. No hope for probable termina-
customer-a:, ?tlY _buSiness might be ruined. tion in the future, and
Tais woulcilgree under goodwill. But I Second. No current effective accom-
Wouldn't he paid for that." plishment_ except holding the line.
AtOvusra -rut IvirsofiAmstge Mr. President, it is for this reason that
,
He added: We must look to a thorough reevaluation
"Nor are al ..v.sioe,saMerk,paid for their., of laws and policies in this field. I do
merchandise. I might have $30,000 worth_of, not think that the Department of Agri-
stuff in my store. It will sell where I am Culture, involved as it is with political
located. policy made by the administration and
"If the city were to Make me move I could_
move the merchandise so Wouldn't be paid day-to-day administration of the agri-
for it. nut could I sell it, say, in Forest_ cultural program, can do this job. It
Inns? No., I would have to buy different _ certainly will lend its expertise to such
items. , an effort as recommended by my joint
"This ha e 4aPPened to merchants forced , resolution.
out of ?East Harlem an.d_Other, a; eaa.", Mr. President, in other nations there
Herman ?Basfillo, deputy commissioner of _
are lay commissions to do this job. We
the 'real estate department, said that he
simply did not 'know how legislation corn-
_
too have our precedent for special study
pensating for goodWill could be drawn up. commissions such as the Hoover Com-
"It would have to cover every type of busi- Mission. We have no better means in
ness," he said. "Should a man be convex).- _ this Nation for working toward the
-sated if he nires four blocks _frOra his Pres- total national interest than the synthesis
ent site blit not two? These w9,14c1 be the of ideas among our legislators, adMinis-
problems." , trators, and those from the private ceo-
B BIN nomic sector. Such a synthesis is the
Yet nearly every official concerned agrees overriding need, if we are to solve the
that in a small marginal business a man can , growing problems of agriculture in the
be financially ruined by being forced to move
interest of national policy. I very much
only several blocks.
Store Space in or near housing develop- hope that my proposal will serve as a
ments is offered first to fOriner site teriants, basis for study before the next Congress
but they seldom can afford the increased and for action next year.
rents.
Or, if they can afford the increase and do
want to return to the area, they have the _ ARMORY SHOW OF 1913?COMMEM-
problem of surviving the year or two while ORATIVE POSTAGE STAMPS
ttie new development is under construction. ,
I Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, I intro-
The PRESIDING, OFFICER. duce, for appropriate reference, a bill to
bill will be received and appropriately provide for the issuance of a special
referred. , _ series of postage stamps in commemora-
The bill (S. 3808) to amend title I QI tion of the 50th anniversary of the orig-
the Housing Act of 1949, to increase the inal "Armory Show of 1913" held in New
maximum amount of relocation PaY- York City.
Ments to be made to a business concern The PRESIDING OFFICER. The bill
- displaced by an urban renewal project will be received and appropriately re-
and to Provide a Method for ascertain, f erred.
Ing the amount of such payments, intro- The bill (S. 3809) to provide for the
duced by Mr. JAvirs, was received, read issuance of a special series of postage
Committee on Banking and Currency.
twice by its title, and referred to the _stamps in commemoration of the 50th kanniverpary of the original "Armory
;,-Show of 1913" of New York City, N.Y.,
A COMMISSION FOR THE Rpvision introduced by, Mr. JAvrrs, was received,
kv)pnAT.4 ppTuRAJ; read twice by its title, and referred to
LAWSPR9GI:AMS
AN ,the Committee on Post Office and Civil
,}
'Service.
Mr, JAtTS. _Mr. President, I intro-
duce, for appropriate reference, a joint
HE RIL O THE
resolution to establish a Corninission for . PE F
the Revision, of Federal Agricultural ANTIJ
,
Laws and. .gNg-ra411-s- Qf ,coln*Se., I am Mr. VITS. Mr. President, the Corn-
aware thi&nOhing can be done .toward Inunist presence in Cuba, carrying with
the ellactIPPItt oL t,?11.1.a, proposal during it increasing threats to the tranquility of
this session,uf,the congress. However, I the Western Hemisphere, poses for the
believe that Its, ,,official printing at this _United States problems for which ready
time may engender study and discussion solutions do not appear at hand. It is
of the implications of such Commission vital that, if we are to act with the in-
to prepare the ,way for speedy consid- telligence and fortrightness required in
erationby tJe ncAt Congress. this crisis, Americans must be informed
'Currenta,grtchltural programs are both as to the facts and as to solutions
costing the taxpayers an annual Dffered. In the October 5 issue of Life
average orte billion a year. _ IrUnically, magazine, Clare Boothe Luce, distin-
t-ve tiaT ,tioVng our fellow citizens to guished former U.S. Ambassador to Italy
13116114W tbis tremendous burden with, and formerly a member of the House
out even being able to show sone hope committee on Foreign Affairs, presents
her exposition of the Cuban situation
and offers solutions for our dilemma
there. Her article is, as is characteristic
of Mrs. Luce, provocative and strong, it
merits reading and consideration by all
who seek to be informal on the difficul-
ties which beset us in the Caribbean to-
day. Mrs. Luce's article is appended
hereto.
There being no objection, the article
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
CUBA AND THE UNFACED TRUTH?OUR GLOBAL
DOUBLE BIND
(By Clare Boothe Luce)
During a nationally televised press con-
ference a few weeks ago President Kennedy
said, "I would like to * * * set [the Cuban
situation] in perspective." This is precisely
*hat he has failed to do. By resting the
case against intervention on a shockingly
erroneous estimate of our Cuban dilemma,
the President has evaded a desperately ur-
gent task?to alert the people of this Nation
to the grave dangers we face.
What are the facts?
"The President feels that Cuba is a bone
in his throat." So spoke one of President
Kennedy's aids soon after the abortive in-
vasion of the Bay of Pigs. Since then the
obstruction in the Presidential gullet has
become a large bone of national and inter-
national contention. How did it get stuck
there in the first place? How big and how
dangerous is it? Can it be dislodged short of
war?
The President naturally wants to keep
these awkward questions out of this fall's
congressional elections. But the failure to
ask them and to answer them is fraught with
danger to the Nation.
Castro began as a bone in the throat of
the Eisenhower administration 4 years ago.
Two years later, Candidate Kennedy did his
eloquent best to get Mr. Nixon to "strangle"
on it. Picking the decline of American safety
and prestige as his theme, Kennedy pointed
to the rise of Castro as prime evidence that
"our security and leadership are both slip-
ping away." His Cuban policy was to "let
the Cuban people know our determination
that they will someday again be free," to "let
Mr. Khrushchev know that we are permit-
ting no expansion of his foothold in our
hemisphere," and especially to "end the har-
assment * * * of liberty-loving anti-Castro
forces in Cuba and in other lands." "Thus
far," Candidate Kennedy said, "these fighters
for freedom have had virtually no support
from our Government." "Hopefully," he
said, "events may once again bring us an
opportunity to [act] on behalf of the cause
of freedom in Cuba."
Hopefully, events did bring the newly
elected President this opportunity. In
April 1961 President Kennedy authorized the
Cuban invasion. But at the last and fateful
hour he ordered the withdrawal of decisive
U.S. air support, abandoning 1,400 "liberty-
loving anti-Castro fighters for freedom" to
Castro's tanks, jails and firing squads. His
profile in courage turned into a profile of in-
decision.
In 1960, addressing himself to the military
aspect of the Cuban situation, Senator Ken-
nedy said, "I think Castro is a source
of maximum danger. ? * * A Communist
menace * * * has been permitted to arise
under our very noses, only 90 miles from our
shores. * * * [Castro's] transformation of
Cuba into a Communist base of opera-
tions * * * by jetplane, missile or subma-
rine ? * * is an incredibly dangerous devel-
opment." Thus, he warned, "the whole
Western Hemisphere security system is
drastically threatened."
Today President Kennedy says, "Rash talk
is cheap, particularly on the part of those
Approved For Release 2004/06/23 ? CIA-RDP65B0M3R0002002.30M5?
22078 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? SEN- uctober 12
who do not have the responsibility (for de-
cision]." Referring to Soviet shipments to
Cuba, the President now says that these "do
not constitute a serious threat to any other
part of this hemisphere." He strongly de-
nies that the Communist buildup is such
as "to endanger or interfere with our secu-
rity." or that Cuba is "an offensive military
base of significant capacity."
Why is President Kennedy so relatively
calm today?
The President and his advisers have con-
stantly failed to understand that the same
ideological, political and military necessities
which make it essential for the United States
to maintain Berlin as a "showcase of democ-
racy" on Russia's border are operating today
from Moscow, to maintain Cuba as a "show-
case of communism" on our shores.
Castro's Culon, still only 90 miles off our
shores, has the second strongest ground
army in our hemisphere. Estimated at 400,-
000 men, including militia, it has received,
sines the failure of the invasion, over $175
million in thilitcay aid and supplies from
Communist-bloc countries. Communist-
made jeeps, jets, tanks, radar, and electronic
equipment are almost daily arrivals in
Cuban harbors. According to the State De-
partment and Intelligence reports, 4,500 Rus-
elan soldiers, sailors, and technicians are in
Cuba helping Castro. They are training
new pilots, ground crews, and artillery men.
Just last week Centro announced construe-
? of a 12-million-peso fishing port on the
Cubali coast for use by the Russians. Sites
few guided missiles and rockets and bases
far submarines and submarine detection are
possible. Cuba will be capable of inflicting
great damage on the U.S. naval installation
at Cituuatanatho. And behind these beefed-
'up forces Stands the U.S.S.R., openly pledged
to support them, with its atomic power if
necessary.
The bitter truth is that Cuba today is a
far more effective base of Communist activ-
ity than it was 2 years ago. It is now a
bustling, well-organized jumping-off point
Into all its neighboring countries for
Spanish-speaking spies, provocateurs, prop-
agandists, and secret military agents. (Many
of them, according to intelligence sources,
have been operating among Cuban refugees
and Puerto Rican citizens here in the
United States.)
Mr. Kennedy indicates that his hopes of a
peaceful solution of the Castro problem lie
partially in the deterioration of the Cuban
political and economic situation. Dangling
the prospect of a convenient collapse before
this Nation's eyes, he says, "Castro (Is) in
trouble. ? e ? His own followers are begin-
ning to see that their revolution has been
betrayed."
What are the chances of a successful re-
bellion by Castro's disillusioned people?
Ells unpopularity with a great section of his
populace can no longer be questioned. But
the unjalIed remnants of the Cuban under-
ground today no longer have the means or
the will to challenge Castro's Soviet-armed
firing squads. Like the Hungarians before
them, the Cuban people have learned the
bitter lesson of resistance: that Soviet Rus-
sia will spring to the aid of Soviet dictators
wherever they may be, but the United States
will not always go to the aid of men fight-
ing for their freedom.
Meanwhile, the rising generation in Cuba
Is being vigorously indoctrinated with anti-
democratic, anti-United States and pro-Rus-
sian ideas. Ti is being taught to think of it-
self as the vanguard of the Communist liber-
ation in the Western Hemisphere.
Radio Cuba broadcasts around the clock
to all the Latin American nations. Their
Underprivileged masses are told that their
economic and political freedom depends on
bxiting out all pro-17/3. pceiticians, and
elevating public officials who stand ready
to join the dynamic ranks of Comnrunist
republics, which now, because of Castro. can
truthfully be said to girdle the globe.
The United States, Radio Cuba claims, is
lending billions of economic aid to its south-
ern neighbors for one reason only: fear of
Khrushchev and Castro. American aid, it
warns, win die on the vine the day Castro
Is defeated. The argument is a powerful
one. Probably all Latin American govern-
ments view Castro and communism at least
in part as a dollar-generating program. It
would explain why even pro-U.S. leaders are
reluctant to take action against him or their
own domestic Corrununists.
President Kennedy has said that "monu-
mental economic mismanagement, supple-
mented by our refusal to trade with [Castro]
has crumbled" the Cuban economy. This
seems to suggest the hope that the regime
will collapse of its own weight and thereby
discredit communism.
How justified is that hope?
There is no question that in the last few
years living standards under Castro have
deteriorated appallingly?as they have under
Walter Ulbricht In East Berlin and Janos
Radar in Hungary. In 1959. Cuban exports
were $675 million and imports $740 million;
today, exports are $320 million. Imports $350
million. Roughly, Cuba has lost one-half of
her world trade. Castro would indeed be
crusted by his own people by now?except
for one' all-Important fact: Kremlin sup-
port. When Castro came to power in 1959,
80 percent of Cuba's trade was with the
United States. Today. 85 percent is with
the Communist-bloc countries.
Today Castro and his country are in total
hock to Moscow. If Castro should balk at
this, or in any other way become a liability
or nuisance, the Kremlin will quickly dispose
of him.
President Eisenhower is quoted as hav-
ing said recently that he had heard the term
"peaceful blockade" but he didn't know what
the term meant. A naval blockade. if it is
to succeed, must be continuously main-
tained and enforced on vessels of all flags.
Allied and neutral, no less than "enemy,"
verse's must be intercepted and cargoes
dumped or returned to home porta. Inter-
national law defines such a blockade as "an
act of war carried out by the warships of a
belligerent detailed to prevent access or de-
parture from a defined part of the enemy's
coast."
Americans will remember that Kaiser Bill's
harassment of American shipping in 1917
was construed by Woodrow Wilson as an act
of war on the part of Germany against the
"neutral" United States. A naval blockade
led directly to our entrance into World War
L Consequently, the establishment of a
formai U.S. naval blockade against Cuba
could be construed as an act of war by any
melon whose vessel is so intercepted. It is,
of course, reasonable to assume that however
much a naval blockade against our allies
would gum up our relations with them, they
would not war against America for turning
back their Cuba-bound trade vessels. What
is certain is that Cuba would declare a naval
blockade to be an act of war, and that the
U.S.S.R. would endorse that declaration.
Thus, putting the Cuban situation in its
true perspective would require the President
to make an excruciatingly painful admis-
sion: That the failure to carry through the
Cuban invasion in April 1981 has already had
dangerous, and perhaps disastrous, conse-
quences for American global policies. No
peaceful action that the United States can
presently take can be counted on to end the
Soviet buildup in Cuba.
Whatever usefulness or validity the his-
toric Monroe Doctrine may have had before
the invasion, the failure of that Invasion and
subsequent events would seem to have des-
troyed them. The doctrine, proclaimed by
President James Monroe on December 2, 1823,
warned the European powers that "Se should
consider any attempt ? ? ? to extend their
system to any portion of this hemisphere as
dangerous to our peace and safety." (It is
an irony of history that what inspired this
doctrine was the attempt of Imperial Russia
to penetrate "peacefully" into the American
Northwest.)
By April of 1961, Castro was openly under
the Soviet wing. Mr. Kennedy gave the
invasion go-light even though OAS ap-
proval had not been secured. But when he
withdrew 'U.S. air support at the last mo-
ment, one reason apparently was his consid-
eration for the multilateral concept of the
Monroe Doctrine.
Despite such lip-service to the Monroe
Doctrine, the President (currently using the
voice of HeIlatCH HUBERT HUMPHREY) 320W
wishes to supplant it with the "Kennedy doc-
trine." What is the Kennedy doctrine?
An analysis of the President's hard-core
position on Cuba shows it to be this: The
United States will not initiate any military
action against a peaceful extension of Soviet
power in our hemisphere, or a defensive So-
viet military buildup in Cuba, but it will
consider an offensive buildup to be dangerous
to our safety. And, in the event of an armed
attack by satellite Cuba against the United
States or any of its neighbors, the United
States is determined not to wait for other
OAS nations to take action?it will uni-
laterally counterattack the attackers.
Upon even closer examination, this Ken-
nedy doctrine looks quite familiar. And so
it is. The Kennedy doctrine proves to be
the 15-year-old Truman-Eisenhower doc-
trine, designed to contain Soviet Russia in
areas outside the American hemisphere. The
essential feature of that doctrine is, and
always has been, nonaggression while main-
taing the military capacity to retaliate in
kind against Communist military initiatives.
It incorporates the military tit-for-tat or
retaliation principle?the ultimate tit-for-tat
being of course, massive retaliation. The
rationale behind the doctrine of containment
was the realistic acceptance of the European
satellite states as legitimate zones of Rus-
sian concern and influence. Stripped of its
double-talk, the Kennedy doctrine plunks for
the application of this old Truman-Eisen-
however containment doctrine to our own
hemisphere. Apparently so long as the
U.S.S.R. does not use Cuba as an offensive
base, it is now to be considered as a legi-
timate zone of Russian power.
So, the United States has now been placed
in a global double bind. if the United States
should intervene in Cuba. it must do so at
the risk of exposing all its military bases
and positions in Europe, the Near East, and
Asia to the threat of Russian or Communist
flanking attacks. But, If it does not inter-
vene and should serious trouble?short of
ultimate nuclear war?begin in Berlin, Tur-
key, Iran, Laos, Vietnam, Formosa, or Korea,
the United States now risks exposing the
Western Hemisphere not only to constant
Soviet reconnaissance but also to flanking
attacks from Cuba.
The United States is now faced with two
dismaying alternatives: to challenge Russian
power in our hemisphere now, at the risk of
war breaking out on other global fronts and
(unless displamatic concessions are made
quickly there) escalating into world war III;
or to sit and wait while Soviet military power
is consolidated in our hemisphere, with the
very real possibility that communism will
take over large areas of Latin America.
It is in this grim global perspective that
the people of this Nation must now debate
the question of whether or not intervention
Is "required or justified" in Cuba. In con-
cealing the extent of our dilemma, the Presi-
dent Is denying the citizens of this Nation
the right of a free people to debate crucial
Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : CIA-RDP65600383R000200230011-5
,
,,-;"4- Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200230011-5
1962 C NGRESSIONA.1, RECORD -- SENATE 22079
?
national issues with all the _relevant facts
before them, Short-range political astute-
ness May indicate the need to play down the
size of the present Cris/s. But long-range
statesmanship solemnly demands that the
truth be toil,
What 14 .no7 at Stake in the decision for
intervention or nonintervention in Cuba is
the question not only of American prestige
but of American, survival. If the decision
is not to intervene, then that means the
United SOPA...accepts the existence of Soviet
military and political power In the Western
Hemisphere. Postponing the decision to in-
tervene will not make it any easier. The
same arguments which are need against
intervention today could and would be used
when Russia has control of half a dozen
hemisphere countries-. If the United_States
deems that Russian military power in this
hemisphere is intolerable, it would be the
part of wisdom to say so clearly now, and to
act accordingly. The vast majority of the
American people, including most of the
President's critics and opponents, will sup-
port the President when,he takes action.
1.'
THE TIME IS NOW
Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, we are
quite used to the war correspondents of
the great dailies and wire services travel-
ing to the world's trouble spots to cover
a story. The Negro community of New
York had the opportunity of receiving
such on-the-spot coverage when one of
Its own, Mr. James Li. Hicks, executive
editor of the New York Amsterdam News
went to Oxford, Miss., to report on the
recent unfortunate developments there.
Subsequent to his return Mg. Hicks
has written a challenging editorial which
merits, I feel, general attention. His
challenge is constructive, a plea for un-
derstanding, and indicative of his Ma-
ture philosophy that the solution for
Wrongs is to right them, not to com-
pound them with further acrimony. The
editorial is appended hereto.
There being no objection, the article
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
TUS TIME IS Now
Student bodies of universities all over the
world are generally in the forefront of the
most forward-looking steps taken in any
nation.
Wherever we have had great reform in
industry we have had student bodies, the 11-
legentsla, if you please, in the forefront of
such movements.
And In thinking of this we can't help but
note what a great opportunity the students
at Mississippi University had to launch, ini-
tiate GT join in a southWide movement that
could quickly bring about the end of such
,bigotry and foolishness as we have seen re-
cently evidenced in the James H. Meredith
What a golden opportunity for the presi-
dent of the ?tudent Council at the Univer-
sity of' Mississippi to be able to start a move-
ment on his Ovill campus that would bring
about the complete acceptance of James H.
Meredith as a "black rebel" student, the
first in the 114 year history of Ole Miss.
Such acceptance of Meredith's admission
at Qle Miss is as Certain to eventually fol-
low as the day follows the night. It's only
a matter Of time.
' But bow wonderful it would be?what
great statUre,.the AtIltienthody of Ole Miss
0104 sp if the students themselves
WORN ,today take the situation by the horns,
dash Silly tradition and say to themselves
that time must be "nOW:'
VOTING PROCEDURE IN UNITED
NATIONS
Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, I have
received from the Assistant Secretary of
State in Charge of United Nations Affairs
Harlan Cleveland, a pertinent letter
which clarifies a point made by me in
debate, in which I said that a nation
which, following decisions of the Inter-
national Court of Justice, fails to pay its
current U.N. assessment for 2 years will
not automatically lose its right to vote
in the General Assembly, but that that
right must be denied to it by a vote of the
General Assembly.
The Department of State takes the
view that that is not so; that delinquent
states automatically lose their right to
vote if they are more than 2 years in
arrears, and that this point may be made
on a simple point of order to the Presi-
dent of the General Assembly.
? I think this statement is so important
that, with the permission of the De-
partment of State, I ask unanimous con-
sent that the letter dated September 28,
1962, may be printed at this point in the
RECORD.
There being no objection, the letter
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
SEPTEMBER 28, 1962.
We are taking the position in the General
Assembly that the denial of the right to vote
Is automatic whenever a country is more
than 2 years in arrears.
Article 19 simply says that: "A member of
the United Nations which is in arrears in
the payment of its financial contributions
to the Organization shall have no vote in
the General Assembly if the amount of its
arrears equals or exceeds the amount of the
contributions due from it for the preceding
2 full years."
The U.S. view, which we have been pro-
moting with other countries, is that this
language is fully automatic. As a matter
of fact, no country has ever been in the
condition described in the sentence I have
.just quoted from article 19?but several
countries paid up part of their arrears shortly
5before the current General Assembly, to
avoid being the guinea pigs under this
article. But when and if the conditions do
arise, we believe the President of the General
'Assembly would simply declare that the
country in question would not be made a
part of the next rollcall or would skip the
country's name in calling the roll. (There is
precedent for this in other international or-
ganizations that have similar "loss of vote"
articles.)
That ruling could no doubt be challenged
and, if so, would go to a general vote of the
General Assembly. Moreover, article 19 also
provides that the General Assembly may
'permit such a Member to vote if it is satis-
fied that the failure to pay is due to condi.
tions beyond the control of the Member."
Both the appeal from a ruling by the Chair
or an appeal to be excused from the sanc-
tion in article 19 on grounds of hardship
would require affirmative action by the Gen-
eral Assembly. But the denial of the vot%
as such, should be fully automatic.
I mention this because I think it is im-
portant that other nations not derive the
impression that there Is argument in this
country among supporters of the United Na-
tions as to whether article 19 would be auto-
matically applied or not. I'm sure you will
appreciate the importance of this In the con-
text of the discussions to be held?by Am-
passador Klutznick and one of your col-
'
leagues Senator ALLOTT?in the Fifth Com-
mittee of the 17th General Assembly this fall.
Warmest regards.
Sincerely,
HARLAN CLEVELAND,
Assistant Secretary.
THE WORLD GROWS UP?AND SO
DO WE
Mr. JAVITS. Mr. President, in the
New York Times of this morning there
is a news story which can give us at
least a little hope that the tragic events
in Mississippi have added to the sum
total of human understanding. As Mr.
Meredith was reported to have said after
his registration at the university, it was
"not a happy occasion." Yet it was an
occasion at whi3h principle, law, and,
above all, morality prevailed in the face
of an enemy?man's blind fear and
hatred of some of his fellows?who has
throughout human history compiled a
deplorable record of victories.
The news story to which I refer deals
with the reaction of those countries to
the events in Mississippi, which have
an overriding interest in our Nation's
policies with respect to its own non-
white citizens. Those countries with a
nonwhite citizenry of their own are not
unaware of the problems they them-
selves must solve?but in seeking guid-
ance to the solution of these problems
they look with great care on the actions
of those who are leaders in the world.
I believe that our national implementa-
tion of the law, in upholding the right
of a qualified citizen to an opportunity
to receive an education, was vital proof
of the sincerity of our public protesta-
tions.
Mr. President, I believe also that the
favorable reaction cited in this story
gives proof of how close to disaster, in
terms of our moral standing and our self-
respect, we stood last week?and that it
gives proof that our cherished way of
life can only survive if it lives up to its
own standards. I ask unanimous con-
sent to have the news story printed at
this point in the RECORD.
There being no objection, the article
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
U.S. RACIAL ACTION PRAISED /N AFRICA?FIRM
HANDLING OF MLSSISSIPP/ CRISIS SAID TO
HAVE MADE A FAVORABLE IMPRESSION
(By David Binder)
WASHINGTON, October 11.?The Federal
Government's firm handling of the Missis-
sippi crisis has made favorable impression
in Africa, according to information available
here.
At the height of the crisis, when U.S.
troops and Federal marshals were dispatched
to the University of Mississippi to back the
registration of a Negro student, James H.
Meredith, the President of Mali, Modibo
Keita, cabled President Kennedy his con-
gratulations for acting decisively.
Mr. Keita's government has developed
strong ties to the Soviet bloc in recent
months, so the cable, dated October 1, was
viewed here with surprise and pleasure.
REACTION A SURPRISE
Mr. Kennedy wired his thanks to the Mali
leader last October 3.
ApproveO For Reiease 2004/06/23 : CIA-RDP65600383R000200230011-5
Approved For Release 2004/06/23:12iepp
22080 CONGRESSIONAL REtoRD? SEN
At the same time, it was reported that
Guinean political leaders reacted vdth
approval of the Federal actions in Mississippi.
Rather than deplore the segregationist at-
titudes of some southerners. Ithleh the
Guineans knew existed. they are quoted as
saying, In effect: "What country in the world
would mobilize a whole army to get a Negro
student into college?"
These impressions; contrast with the ex-
pectations of some observers here, who
thought that the Mississippi crisis would be
regarded as new evidence of racism in the
'United States.
Qualified observers in Washington declare
they are quite pleased with this country's
performance in African nations as compared
with that of the Soviet bloc.
In Guinea, for example, official doors that
were once cloud to Americans and open to
Russians are now said to he somewhat more
ajar for TM diplomats.
The prime cause for this change la said
to be the so-called Commanist plot uncov-
ered in Conakry last December that led to
the ouster of the Russian Ambassador.
SII8/3IAN ?AUX PAS
But U.S. sources contend that the poor
performance Of Soviet aid and development
programs, as well u the uningratiating be-
havior of Rttasian technicians, contributed to
The wave of Communist influence In Guinea.
American Sources contend the Russians
unninitted several faux pas. Chace they back-
slapped Guinean mining officials. calling
the= "comrade" and using the familiar "tu"
(you) in French, rather than the more for-
mal "vous."
The Guilleans, it ins asserted, resented
this familiarity. Soviet officials are said
to have thunned contacts irtth ordinary
GULneans. Some 'natives, It was said, sus-
pect them of snobbery and racist sentiments.
Cm the other hand. the Americans amen,
G. Mennen Williams, Assistant Secretary of
State for African Affairs, who is a backslapper
With the best of them, immediately achieved
rapport with Guinean leaders, including
President Sekou Toure, during a recent visit.
The difference, according to observers. was
that Mr. Williams knew his "tu" from his
'?VOUS" and demonstrated appreciation for
Guinean sophistication in political affairs.
The list of recent American gains and
Russian setbacks in Guinea, attested to by
B. sources, Is a long one.
It includes such items as the ouster of
about 60 French Corninuniet teachers along
with the Ruestan Ambassador; the padlocking
of i Communist book store that had been
distributing propaganda; enactment of a
law guaranteeing foreign investments; the
loining of the International Monetary Puna:
an invitation to the Peace Corps: and votes
figainst the Soviet bloc in the United Na-
tions.
YOUTH OF ALL NATIONS
Mr. JAVTTS. Mr. President, I have
recently received a letter from Miss
Eugenia Barton, a young lady in her sen-
ior year at Cornell University, telling me
of the organization, Youth of All Na-
tions, Inc., YOAN for short. YOAN has
established a correspondence exchange
between young people throughout the
world to intreduce individual citizens of
the United States to those of other coun-
tries. Eacb participant in the program
Oakes a formal application to YOAN,
- Which includes pertinent background in-
fOrmatren about his hobbies, education,
and language abnrties.
Miss Batton has described to me the
Value which 4 years of such correspond-
ing with Young People in other countries
has meant to her. I wish to call this to
the attention of my colleagues in the
Senate, because I believe that it is
through such programs which facilitate
the frank exchange of ideas by our youth
that the people of this world may even-
tually find a wider and deeper under-
standing to help us to live together and
work together.
I ask unanimous consent that Miss
Barton's letter be inserted in the RICORD.
There being no objection, the letter
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
Demi SENATOR Javrrs: I an studying inter-
national relations' at Cornell University,
where I am a senior. This summer I have
been working as a guide at the United Na-
tions. (Incidentally, because I speak Rus-
sian fluently. I have been asaigned to guide
some visiting Russians. too.)
This letter concerns an organization to
which I have belonged for 4 years--Youth
of All Nations, Inc., YOAN for short, located
at 16 St. Luke's Place, !few Tort, N.Y.
YOAN's purpose Is to acquaint young people
all over the world with each other through
carefully arranged personal correspondence.
However, it is not a simple addresses ex-
cbange, but prospective members must first
answer questions about their schooling, run-
bitions. hobbies, knowledge of foreign lan-
guages. etc. Then, they are introduced to
someone in another country with similar
interests. The program is primarily aimed
at college age students and more serious
teenagers rather than young children.
Members of YOAN also receive the orga-
nization's magazine. called Mirror for Youth.
to which they contribute their experiences
and ideas, and share their letters: for, of
course, no one member can possibly cor-
respond with all countries.
I cannot express how much membership
In YOAN has benefited me. Not only has
my international understanding increased.
but now I have good friends in Italy and
Sweden. and I am just beginning corres-
pondence with members in Spain and South
Vietnam. We exchange viewpoints, polit-
ical Idea.. local news. experiences. etc. I am
also learning why our culture and politics
tieSEtmetirnes criticised, and why certain
misunderstandings about Americans might
arise.
My friends who belong to YOAN also
think very highly of it. The organization
is nonproftt, uonsectarian. and nonpartisan,
and is headed by Miss Clara Leiser. Its
founder. Its work should be made more
widely known end it should also be better
supported. because it has' been doing an ex-
odierrit job hi increasing international un-
derstanding. The young people who belong
to YOAN are usually the more articulate
elements of their societies and in a few
years they will be the leaders. If they can
be helped to understand the same genera-
tion in other areas of the world, then much
Is being done to help peace.
Do you think It would be possible for you
to include something about YOAN in your
reports to your constituenta? in print or
by radio-TV?. If you will do this, please ask
Interested persons aged 14 to 24 to send
a self-addressed, stamped envelope, and 10
cents (for handling costs) to Youth of All
Nations, 16 St. Luke's Place, New York 14,
N.Y. U you with more information, please
contact Miss Leiser or me. The YOAN tele-
phone number is Watkins 4-1368.
Thank you very much.
Respectfully yours,
ZUGENIA BARTON.
SARATOGA BATTLEFIELD NATIONAL
PARK AND CEMETERY
Mr. JAvrrs. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous consent to have printed in
the RECORD a resolution I have received
from the board of supervisors of Sche-
nectady County, N.Y., with reference to
the need for a third battlefield cemetery
in that area.
There being no objection, the resolu-
tion was ordered to be printed in the
RECORD, as fonows:
RESOLUTION 141
Resolution on Saratoga Battlefield National
Park National Cemetery urged
Whereas Federal authorities have deter-
mined there is a need for an additional na-
tional cemetery in New York State to meet
the growing demands for burial space for
our honored veterans; and
Whereas the two existing national ceme-
teries are located at Elmira and Farming-
dale?both approximately 200 miles from
Schenectady County; and
Whereas it would seem logical to estab-
lish a third national cemetery in the imme-
diate area: and
Whereas facilities and space are now avail-
able at the Saratoga Battlefield National
Park as a memorial site that would lend
dignity and prestige to such a cemetery: Now,
therefore, be it
Resolved, That the Schenectady County
Board of Supervisors give its full support
and approval of efforts now being made by
the Schenectady County Committee of the
American Legion to establish a national
cemetery at Saratoga Battlefield National
Park; and be it further
Resolved, That copies of this resolution be
transmitted to our congressional representa-
tives in Washington and the Schenectady
County American Legion.
PROPOSED VEDERAL CONSOLI-
DAII.i.) BALANCE St,
Mr. MORSE. Mr. President, as a
long-time supporter of a Federal capital
budget I was delighted to read in a re-
cent column by the former administra-
tion's Bureau of the Budget chief,
Maurice Stans, a suggestion that the
Federal budget provide a consolidated
balance sheet listing the Government's
assets and liabilities, in addition to the
customary cash-in and cash-out state-
ment.
Mr. Stans correctly points out that the
taxpayer would like to know how much
the Government has invested in "loans,
stockpiles, securities, farm products,
foreign currencies, working funds, public
buildings. Government-owned corpora-
tions, and so on."
If such a balance sheet were prepared,
it would indicate the extent of Federal
investment in the Federal power pro-
gram, together with the handsome re-
turn which the U.S. Treasury is earning
on this investment. In fact, sueh a bal-
ance sheet might prevent Mr. Stans and
the private power companies from par-
roting endlessly the line about how much
the Federal power program allegedly
costs the taxpayers.
Mr. Stans, in another column pub-
lished in the Washington Post on Sep-
tember 30, carried this unsupported
charge, and others, to ridiculous lengths.
He contended that if only the private
Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : CIA-RDP65600383R000200230011-5
196R pp oved For
017';
?_Motor Vci4le gJngAgeny and in the
?procesreckadany hopes for rational park-
' big ,strategy at the very time our rnidcity
blinding boom is creating a parking crisis-
-and with It p4ential blighting influence?
Of Major proportions.
But all the blame cannot he Unburdened
at the doorstep of an obstrucnonist Om",
Civic anci,governinental leadership in the
NatiOnai CARit_41?_,.area is_ln a..bad way. The
agencies to writeh_we LiDk for leadership
are fighting among themselves ?and M the,
pracess, paralyzing our decisionmaking
faculties. _
4011731litz4 wmirsitz
We have seen our desperately needed ex-
pressway system lose all forward momentum
during the past 12 months, falling prey to
jurisdictional guerrilla_ warfare between
transit partisans and road/Mils:less. Mr.
13to4ZenbaCb, Administrlitor,Uf the National
Capital Transportation Agency, conceived it
as one Of 110 first duties to polarize the
transit-freeway battle. _
X can think of AO Mare palpable nonsense
than the way the obstructionists have urged
. Us to delay project after project until Mr.
?Stolzenbach's plan is finished. One would
third; Mr. Stolzenbach was away on a flight
to TOTS; he has never yet once said that any
SCUM:3 could be talten without injuring his
mysterious plan.
Our Planning Commission, with one foot
salidly planted in the _year 2000, has re-
cently tried to spf,t-shoe its may through
controversies ever theliighway program, and
the need for ,renewal of Georgetown's in-
dustrial waterfront._ The commission has
not exercised its full measure of leadership
in coordinating Federal moves throughout
the metropolitan area.
-DART, GAIVIE
And the Federal Government has been one
Of the worst transgressors. Executive
agencies have been playing a reckless game
of darts with the map of Metropolitan
Washington. "
?Instead of WOrking as a positive influence
in shaping a rational nietroPolitan environ-
inent, it has done just the opposite. The
Central Intelligence Agency's new home at
Langley did not even place in a list of 25
sites picked after careful planning research.
nut Allen 3)31110,5, you may rejnember,
Wanted a Princeton type campus setting for
his, employees and Congressman BROYHILL
could not have been more sympathetic.
? If that massive blockhouse of the CIA's
is campus-type architecture, then I think
We ought th.rename the Pentagon Harvard
Another incredible monument to Federal
? whimsy is the Atomic Energy Commission
building, a 45- or 50-minute or longer drive
from downtown Washington. The secre-
tarie,s were the first to rebel at this exile
exurbia. As usual. they had more sense
than the planning technicians.
Izi fact, we have become so numbed by
this sort Of folly that the Scandalous waste
of Moving NSA to Fort Meade has hardly
ever been noted. _Arm' now we have the
Bureau of Btariclarcla .and other dispersal-
tritridecl, agencies doing violence to the most
elementary concepts of sound metropolitan
planning. ,
CHAOS 'UNLEASHED
? The dis,persers and decentralizers in the
Federal Establishment have failed to? prove
the wisdom of their argument. Instead they
have further unleashed the forces of urban
chaos in the National capital region.
There is, on the contrary great sense in
the new cluster of Federal buildings along
Independence .6.yenue and at the gateway
to the new Southwest. Eut without com-
panion action to accommodate both the
trade and parking demands _of lids Vast iieW
1:065B00383R000200230011-5
UoV4, 22013
employment center, it will only build new
blight factors into our downtown.
Because of the city's enormous public and
private investment in the Southwest, GSA
has a compelling responsibility to provide
underground parking in the Southwest Mall
far at least 4,000 cars. Secondly. GSA should
join others in demanding the earliest pos-
sible completion of the inner loop, no later
than 1970.
There is urgent need for a strong, central
checkrein over the various agencies in
the executive branch.
It is notable that Washington's best days,
as far as the executive branch is concerned,
? Were the years from 1953 to 1958 when under
President Eisenhower, Gov. Sherman Adams
displayed continuing and intelligent interest
in National Capital affairs.
Someday Washington should recognize
formally Governor Adams' contribution to
our city.
KENNEDY ACTION
It is strange, on the other hand, that the
New Frontier waited more than a year and
a half before extending its influence to the
citizens of Metropolitan Washington through
the appointment of Charlie Barsky as Presi-
dential Adviser on National Capital Affairs.
Washington, after all, has been our Presi-
dent's most permanent hometown. It has
also been home to many who serve in his
administration.
The saving of Lafayette Square is just one
example of how much can be achieved with
the active, personal interest of President and
Mrs. Kennedy. And we can now welcome en-
thusiastically the appointment of Mr. Barsky
for giving institutional support to the Presi-
dent's determination to help Washington.
In Congress, the work of Senator ALAN
BIBLE and his Joint Committee on Washing-
ton Metropolitan Problems has shown us
what can be achieved with constructive and
enlightened leadership on Capitol Hill.
Without Senator Blain, we would certainly
not have been even as far along toward
transit modernization as we are today.
- And now I should like to place before you
tonight an agenda for action in the National
Capital region.
FIVE-YEAR GOALS
It is a program not for the year 2000 but
for 1967-5 years from now, something that
falls within our mortal capabilities. We
have the tools, the money, the civic genius to
achieve it. We need only the will.
First, a clean Potomac in which we can
once again swim and fish.
Second, a national cultural center to en-
hance both our Nation and our culture.
Third, although my editorial colleagues at
the Washington Post disagree with me, a
national aquarium to celebrate nature along
with our zoo and opera. For I believe the
gifts and wanders of the ocean are as en-
hancing to man as opera.
Fourth, the rapid flowering of a new down-
town which will serve as the vital center
rather than the shame of our metropolitan
area.
Fifth, an innerloop freeway that is fully
under contract.
Sixth, a functioning metropolitan author-
ity to manage the financing and construction
of a regional mass transit system.
Seventh, modern high-speed subway serv-
ice in our downtown core.
Eighth, a humane and efficient relocation
service for families and businesses to insure
that our public works undertakings do not
streamroller over proprietary rights and in-
dividual initiative.
Ninth, completion of plans for the long-
neglected Southeast and Northeast quad-
rants of our city, along both sides of the
Anacostia.
Tenth, the blossoming of the north side of
nasylvania Avenue.
Eleventh, completion of the Three Sisters
Bridge with perhaps a start on the Fourth
or Fifth Sister, as well as a completed access
road system to Dulles Airport.
OTHER ASPECTS
But we cannot build a greater National
Capital with public works alone.
We must also set our 1967 sights on such
goals as these:
Achieving equal housing and job oppor-
tunities for Negroes and other minorities.
Strengthening our institutions of higher
learning so that we may attract the Nation's
keenest and most cultivated minds as well
as our due share of the new scientific indus-
tries on our periphery.
Coming to grips with our spiraling wel-
fare problems in a way that will attack the
underlying social conditions from which our
relief loads spring.
Creating larger banking and commercial
institutions worthy of a world capital.
Getting more intelligent and responsive
representation in the District committees
of Congress.
In conclusion, I would say that there has
been some good news during the past year
to go with the bad. Mr. Horsky's appoint-
ment was a heartening demonstration that
the administration is recognizing its re-
sponsibility to the National Capital.
COOPERATION NEEDED
But, remarkable as he is, and prodigal as
are his gifts, he is no miracle man.
He will need the ear of a sympathetic
President.
He will need the cooperation of a citizenry
that must stop its nay-saying and must, in
the words of New York's Bob Moses, ignore
the "babel of strident voices" that counsel
delay and negativism.
It is not simply an arrhy of problems that
face Metropolitan Washington. It is a full-
blown crisis.
We must learn to accept the signs of
change and growth that will make our Fed-
eral City as different in the year 2000 as it
was in 1924.
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Graham speaks with
great feeling and deep concern over
long-range future planning. He ex-
presses anxiety over the apparent failure
of those responsible to recognize that the
present and near future?not alone the
distant years?must be reckoned with in
any sensible planning for the Capital
City of Washington.
Mr. Speaker, as the legislative body of
this Capital, the Congress of the United
States must heed the warning and ad-
vice that this dedicated citizen speaks
to. I hope that Mr. Graham's words do
not fall on deaf ears in the Congress, and
I trust that the official planners look to
tomorrow and next year as well as the
year 2000.
As one of many in this House of Rep-
resentatives jealous of and interested in
the beauty and proper growth of Wash-
ington, I congratulate Mr. Graham for
the the thought that went into and the
excellence of his address to an organiza-
tion that is so vitally concerned with the
affairs of this great city.
PREVIOUS SESSIONS OF CONGRESS
(Mr. MATIIIAS asked and was given
permission to extend his remarks at this
point in the RECORD.)
Mr. MATHIAS. Mr. Speaker, as this
session of the 87th Congress lingers into
the middle of the month of October and
witnesses the falling leaves in the streets
rr,Reease 2004/06123 : CIA-RDP65B00383R000200230011-5
Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : CIA-RDP65600383R000200230011-5
22014 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? HOUSE October 11
of Washington, many Members of the
House have expressed curiosity as to the
precedents for such a protracted session.
For their information I should like to
quote the following statistics with regard
to previous sessions of unusual length,
which occurred during an election year.
In 1940 the session lasted 366 days?
from January 3, 1940, to January 3,1941
In 1922 the session lasted 292 days?
from December 5, 1921, to September 22,
1922.
In 1914 the session lasted 328 days?
from December I, 1913, to October 24,
1914.
In 1888 the session lasted 321 days?
from December 5, 1887, to October 20.
1888.
RETIRING MEMBERS OF THE
HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COM-
(Mr. GALLAGHER (at the request of
Mr. GARY) was given permission to
extend his remarks at this point in the
RECORD and to include extraneous
matter.)
Mr. GALLAGHER. Mr. Speaker, as
another session comes to an end, all of
use are saddened by the knowledge that
some of our good friends and colleagues
are retiring from the Congress. I rise
today to salute the devoted service.
patriotism, and workmanship of five of
my colleagues on the House Foreign Af-
fairs Committee.
Representatives ROBERT B. CHIPER-
FIELD, CHESTER E. MORROW, MARGUERITE
STITT CHURCH, LAITRENCE CURT/S, and
HORACE SEELY-BROWN, Jr., will retire
from the Congress and from their seats
on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Each of these distinguished represent-
atives has earned the respect and ad-
miration of their fellow colleagues on
the Foreign Affairs Committee. Al-
though a Democrat and a Junior member
of the committee, I have received their
unfailing assistance and good will in my
work on the committee. Without parti-
san feeling and with the utmost devo-
tion to duty, these Members of Congress
have attempted to work for the ideal
that only by advancing and protecting
freedom throughout the world can the
'United States maintain its security and
dedication to the principles on which
It was founded.
I salute them for their dedicated serv-
ice to their country and to their con-
stituencies, and I wish them all success
in thair future endeavors.
Jte4
RANSOM FMONEY FOR CUBAN
PRISONERS
(Mr. ROGERS of Florida asked and
was given permission to extend his re-
marks at this point in the RECORD.)
Mr. ROGERS of Florida. Mr. Speak-
er, we all have great compilitston for the
Men and the families of men taken Pris-
oner by Castro's Communist regime dur-
ing the Bay of Pigs invasion attempt of
Cuba last year. While we all have com-
passion for their plight and the people
Of the United States greatly feel that the
calms of freedom must be upheld, the
principles of this Nation do not condone
the payment of ransom by the U.S. Gov-
ernment.
I have already urged the President and
the Secretary of State to refuse to allow
any U.S. tax dollars to be used for this
purpose.
This Nation was faced with a ransom
payment in 1805 and defeated those who
were so brazen to demand it. That in-
cident occurred in Tripoli and we re-
fused to pay ransom while our Nation
Was young.
We should do no less while our Nation
is great.
(Mr. HERLONG (at the request of
Mr. Sixes) was given permission to ex-
tend his remarks at this point in the
RECORD and to include extraneous mat-
ter.)
HERLONG'S remarks will ap-
pear hereafter in the Appendix. I
LEAVE OF ABSENCE
By unanimous consent, leave of ab-
sence was granted to Mr. PELLY for Oc-
tober 13 and October 15 on account of
official business.
SPECIAL ORDERS GRANTED
By unanimous consent, permission to
address the House, following the legisla-
tive program and any special orders
heretofore entered, was granted to:
Mr. DEROUNIAN, for 1 hour, today.
Mr. MEADER, for 30 minutes, following
tie special order granted to Mr.
DEROUNIAN.
Mr. ammo (at the request of Mr.
LIBONATI) , today and tomorrow, for 30
minutes each, to revise and extend his
remarks and include extraneous matter.
Mrs. DWYER (at the request of Mr.
BARRY of New York), for 10 minutes, on
October 12.
Mr. MORSE (at the request of Mr.
BARRY of New York), for 15 minutes,
today, to revise and extend his remarks
and include extraneous matter.
Mr. MORSE (at the request of Mr.
BARRY of New York). for 15 minutes, on
October 12.
EXTENSION OF REMARKS
By unanimous consent, permission to
extend remarks in the Appendix of the
RECORD, or to revise and extend remarks,
was granted to:
Mr. WALTER and to include an article
from the current edition of World Af-
fairs.
Mr. BECKWORTH and to include a news-
paper article.
Mr. Virn.z.vars in five instances and to
include extraneous matter.
Mr. LANE in five instances and to in-
clude extraneous matter.
Mr. FEIGHAN in six instances and to
include extraneous matter.
(Mr. CRAMER asked and was given
permission to revise and extend his re-
marks on the conference report on H.R.
12135.)
Mr, ROBERTS of Alabama (at the re-
quest of Mr. LrsoNAri) and include ex-
traneous matter, notwithstanding it ex-
ceeds the limit and is estimated by the
Public Printer to cost $562.50.
MT. WICKERSHAM.
Mr. EVERETT and to include extraneous
matter.
Mr. BELDEN and to include extraneous
matter.
Mr. MORGAN (at the request of Mr.
ZABLOCKI) preceding his own remarks on
retirement of Foreign Affairs Committee
members.
Mr. PILLION (at the request of Mr.
BARRY) and to include extraneous mat-
ter.
Mr. FuLroN (at the request of Mr.
BARRY) in five instances and to include
extraneous matter.
Mr. BAss of Tennessee in five instances
and to include extraneous matter.
Mr. BErrs and to include extraneous
matter which is estimated by the Public
Printer to cost $270.
Mr. BETTS and to include extraneous
matter.
Mr. BARRY in five instances and to in-
clude extraneous matter.
Mr. LIBONATI and to include extraneous
matter.
Mr. FELIX the remarks he made in col-
loquy with Mrs, ST. GEORGE in connec-
tion with the retirement of Join,' RAy
from Congress.
(The following Members (at the re-
quest of Mr. BARRY) and to include
extraneous matter:)
Mr. Cusris of Missouri in two in-
stances.
Mr, CRAMER.
Mr. Bow.
Mr. ASH/MOOR.
Mr. BROOMFIELD at the conclusion of
Mrs. BOLTON'S special order on the re-
tiring members of the Foreign Affairs
Committee.
(The following Members (at the re-
quest of Mr. LIBONATI) and to include
extraneous matter:)
Mr. ANFUSO in two instances.
Mr. MOLTER,
Mr, TOLL in two instances.
Mr. ROSENTHAL.
Mr. MACDONALD in two instances.
Mr. Aszurr in two instances.
Mr. !CHORD of Missouri in two in-
stances,
Mr, PuseELL.
Mr. Nix.
Mr. DtiLsici in eight instances,
Mr. Jonwsori of California in two in-
stances and to include tables.
Mr. GIAIMO in six instances.
The following Members (at the re-
quest of Mr. BARRY) and to include ex-
traneous matter:)
Mr. ?sierra* in live instances.
Mr. DEROUNIAN in six instances.
Mr. WEIS in five instances.
Mr. HALL.
Mr. CUNNINGHAM in three instances.
Mr. W/DNALL in three instances.
Mr. TOPPER.
Mr. Guam in five instances.
Mr. CHAMBERLAIN in six instances.
Mrs. DWYER in five instances.
Mr. MORSE in five instances.
(The following Members (at the re-
quest of Mr. PeLLy) and to include ex-
raneous matter : )
Approved For Release 2004/06/23 : CIA-RDP651300383R000200230011-5