MULTIPLE USE OF SURFACE OF SAME TRACTS OF PUBLIC LANDS-CONFERENCE REPORT

• Document Type: CREST
• Collection: General CIA Records
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): CIA-RDP63T00245R000100180004-7
• Release Decision: RIFPUB
• Original Classification: K
• Document Page Count: 4
• Document Creation Date: December 19, 2016
• Document Release Date: October 3, 2006
• Sequence Number: 4
• Publication Date: January 1, 1955
• Content Type: OPEN

IM
Approved For Release 2006/10/03: CIA-RDP63T00245R0100180004-7
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE
Then, thirdly, religion. The church and
the synagogue-when correctly understood
and used by the parents-can and do play
a major role in the prevention of delin-
quency. The house of God and the religious
`school must, however, not be regarded by
`parents as good places to which to send
their children, but in which they have no
personal interest: How naive can parents be-
come when they say: "I sent them to church,
`didn't I? I sent them to Sunday school,
didn't I? What kind of a church are you
running? You must have a pretty bad Sun-
day school if my children are turning out
this way."
Now, religious institutions, although they
can be exceedingly effective and are effective
in the training of character, cannot perform
and unselfishness only when his parents par-
ticipate with him. Only then will the child
Fourthly, the influence of the community
upon the child's growth and development.
etc., all should be widely expanded
so that more and more of our youth will
come under their influence. The policy of
the infiltration of street gangs by trained
youth leaders that is being pursued by our
own New York Youth Board is, to my mind,
an excellent method of dealing with this
problem. Yes, when the community influ-
ences are favorable, the child has a better
chance to be the kind of citizen that his
parents and .that the community at large
would want him to be.
Finally, it is well known that the moral
climate of a community has its effect upon
the youth. Stories of corruption involving
important Government officials, shady busi-
hesg practices, stories of easy money and of
gangsters who are glorified and become he-
roes, the effect of unwholesome movies, comic
books, TV programs are not without their,
influence upon the young. Dr. Fine tells'
of a young thief who remarked to him:
"Yes, I stole $150 from a gas station. So
.what? How much did Governor Hoffman
steal from the people of New Jersey?" It is
this attitude that is very easily developed
in the minds of impressionable youth. If
they can do it, if they can get away with it,
'Why can't I?"
I shall not go into the improvements that
must be made in the various agencies deal-
ing with our youth after they have become
delinquent-the juvenile police officers, the
juvenile courts, improved foster homes, de-
tention homes, training schools, etc.-but
desire merely to emphasize the need for im-
proving those media which will prevent juve-
hue delinquency, namely, the home, the
school, the church and synagogue, the com-
munity, the morale climate. To achieve
this purpose, we must stop thinking in terms
of delinquent youth, but rather in terms of
our delinquent society. We know the causes.
We also know the cure. Our problem is not
that we demand that something be done
by someone else, but that we express our
willingness to accept whatever responsibility
devolves upon us as members of society and
to make whatever financial sacrifices that
may be necessary in order to build a finer,
healthier, and more worthy community life
for the young people of our country. No
task confronting us is? more important, none
more essential to the well-being of our so-
ciety.
During the war a new expression, crash
program, came into frequent use. It means
that if something of the utmost importance,
something involving the very life.and death
of our country had to be accomplished, then
the question of financial cost was not to be
considered at all. Thus, when it was de-
cided to create an atomic bomb-even
though no one was certain that it could be
achieved-we did not hesitate to spend what
was then, and still is, the astronomical sum
of $2 billion. We said then, and we say now,
that whatever the cost, it was worth it.
Something of the same spirit animated the
National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis
when it embarked upon its dramatic pro-
gram to stamp out this horrible disease.
Untold millions of dollars were spent and will
continue to be spent until this scourge is
completely eliminated from the world. Who
will say that its wasn't-and isn't-worth it?
Some such crash program, it seems to me,
is required if we are to win the war against
juvenile delinquency, a disease which is even
mode dreadful and more destructive than
polio or any other physical ailment. Let us
have more family counselors than we think
we need. Let us build more and better
schools and playgrounds than we think are
necessary. Let us hire better teachers, more
teachers and provide them with a wage to
which they are entitled. Let us engage more
youth directors than we believe we are going
to need. The cost will go up into the hun-
dreds of millions and billions of dollars, but
who will say that it isn't worth it?
At the present time juvenile delinquency is
problem number one in America. It Is in-
finitely more serious than any other prob-
lem which we are confronted. The very
existence of our civilization depends upon its
solution. It must be solved and it can be
solved and it will be solved, when the citizens
of our Nation become aware of the respon-
sibilities devolving upon them. Yes, punish-
ment is necessary when crimes are commit-
ted, whether by juveniles or by adults. But
that doesn't solve the problem. It is the
delinquent society which creates delinquency
that requires our attention.
In the 21st chapter of the Book of Deuter-
onomy a very strange procedure is described
in connection with what is to take place
when a slain person is found in a 4ield and
his murderer is unknown. The elders and
the judges of the city nearest the spot where
the body has been found are required
to offer a sacrifice, wash their hands over
it and then say, "Our hands have not shed
this blood, neither have our eyes seen it.
Forgive, 0 Lord Thy people Israel, whom
Thou had redeemed, and suffer not innocent
blood to remain in the midst of Thy people
Israel." In commenting on this unusual
proceeding, one of the ancient rabbis asked:
"Why is it that. the good people, the re-
spectable people, the elders and the judges
are called upon to swear that their hands,
were guiltless of this crime? Why were not
the cutthroats, the thieves, and the known
criminals of the community made to swear
that they did not perpetrate this crime?" To
these rhetorical questions he provided the
answer: "In order that we might always real-
ize. that not the bad people, but the good
people are responsible for the evils of a
community; the evils of life will disappear
when the good folk assume the responsibili-
ties which belong to them." Amen.
LOSS OF UNITED STATES TRADE IN
LATIN AMERICA
Mr. SMATHERS. Mr, President, to
those of us who recognize the impor-
tance of the Latin American countries to
the economic well-being of our Nation,
the article which appeared in the July
1 issue of the Washington Post and
Times Herald is indeed frightening.
This article is entitled "United States Is
8713
Losing Trade in Latin America." It goes
on to state that Japan and Europe, in-
cluding the Soviet bloc countries, are
cutting into the trade of Latin America
by offering lower prices and longer credit
terms.
This assertation was contained in a
United Nation's report which reviewed
the economy of the Latin America coun-
tries for the year 1954.
Mr. President, the Department of
Commerce reveals that our trade with
Latin America has dropped by almost.
$250 million in the past 2 years, and "
there is every indication that with our
little attention to the affairs of the
countries to the south of us, and in-
creased attention on the part of the
countries of Europe and the Soviet bloc
countries that trade between Latin
America and the United States will un-
fortunately continue to fall off.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous con-
sent to have printed in the RECORD at
this point the above-described article.
There being no objection, the article
was ordered to be printed in the RECORD,
as follows:
UNITED STATES IS LOSING TRADE IN-LATIN
AMERICA
UNITED NATIONS, N. Y., June 30.-Japan
and Europe, including Soviet bloc countries,
are cutting into United States trade with
Latin America by offering cheaper prices and
easier credit terms, a U. N. report disclosed
today. Soviet bloc trading was sharply on
the upgrade, it said,
A review of Latin American economies for
1954 was made public here in advance of
the meeting of the U. N. Economic Commis-
sion for Latin America starting August 29 in
Bogota, Colombia.
Agriculture increases in Latin America as a
whole kept up with a population increase
and industry spurted 8.4 percent over 1953,
but there were gloomy notes in the review.
Investment in Latin America showed a de-
clining trend. Balance of payments surplus
was reduced by more than $700 million.
During 1951 and 1953 imports of European
rolling stock almost equaled those from the
United States, the review-noted. The United
States also was losing ground in commercial
vehicles, not only to Europe but also to
Japan.
European exports to Latin America of
machinery for the pulp, paper, and timber
Industries have more than doubled in 2 years,
while those of the United States and Canada
have fallen by 45 percent, the review said.
Japan was described as extremely active
in textile-machinery sales.
Eastern Europe and Japan have provided
strong competition in agricultural ma-
chinery, cutting considerably imports of
United States tractors.
The United States still holds an edge in
the sale of private automobiles and was
showing recovery in agricultural machinery,
oil drilling machinery and machine tools, the
review said.
MULTIPLE USE OF SURFACE OF
SAME TRACTS OF PUBLIC LANDS-
CONFERENCE REPORT
Mr. ANDERSON. Mr. President, I
submit a report of the committee on con-
ference on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses on the amendments of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 5891) to amend
the act of July 31, 1947 (61 Stat. 681)
and the mining laws to provide for mul-
tiple use of the surface of the same
tracts of the public lands, and for other
Approved For Release 2006/10/03: CIA-RDP63T00245R000100180004-7
 8714
Approved Fpelease 2006/10/03: CIA-R DP63T00,R000100180004-7
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE Jul J 11
purposes. I ask unanimous consent for
the present consideration of the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.
BARKLEY in the chair). The report will
be read for the information of the
Senate.
The legislative clerk read the report,
as follows: .
The committee of conference on the dis-
agreeing votes of the two Houses on the
amendments of the Senate to the bill (H. R.
5891) to amend the act of July 31, 1947 (61
Stat. 681) and the mining laws to provide
for multiple use of the surface of the same
tracts of the public lands, and for other pur-
poses, having met, after full and free con-
ference. have agreed to recommend and do
recommend to their respective Houses as
follows:
That the House recede from its disagree-
ment to the amendment of the Senate and
agree to the same with a further amendment
as follows: On page 5, line 17. of the Senate
engrossed amendment, after the words
"United States" Insert the words "subse-
quent to the location of the claim", and the
Senate agree to the same.
CLINTON P. ANDERSON,
HENRY M. JACKSON.
JOSEPH C. O'MAHONNY,
EUGENE D. MU.LIKIN,
ARTHUR V. WATKINS,
Managers on the Part of the Senate.
CIAIR ENGLE.
WALTER ROGERS
LEE MErcALr,
JOHN P. SAYLOR,
WILLIAM A. DAwsoN.
Managers on the Part of the House.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there
objection to the present consideration of
the report?
There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The
question is on agreeing to the conference
report.
The report was agreed to.
CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN MILI-
TARY, NAVAL, AND AIR FORCE
INSTALLATIONS - CONFERENCE
REPORT
Mr. STE13NIS. Mr. President, I sub-
mit a report of the committee of con-
ference on the disagreeing votes of the
two Houses on the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 6829) to au-
thorize certain construction at military,
naval, and Air Force installations, and
for other purposes. I ask unanimous
consent for the present consideration of
the report.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The re-
port will be read for the information of
the Senate.
The legislative clerk read the report.
(For conference report, see House pro-
ceedings of July 7. 1955, pp. 8661-8669,
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD.)
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there
objection to the present consideration of
the report?
There being no objection, the Senate
proceeded to consider the report.
Mr, JACKSON. Mr. President, I ask
unanimous consent to have printed at
this point in the RECORD a letter which
I received from residents of Langley, Va.
The subcommittee did not know of the
objection of the people of Langley, Va.,
to the possible location of the new CIA
headquarters in that community.
I am not sure whether it has been
finally decided that the headquarters
will go to Langley, Va. I think, how-
ever, that certainly the people of that
community should have an opportunity
to be heard before the Appropriations
Committee before any final decision is
reached. The committee was unaware
of the protect at the time the matter
was being considered.
There being no objection, the letter
was ordered to be printed In the RECORD,
as follows:
JULY 8, 1955.
The Honorable HENRY M. JACKSON,
Senate Office Building,
Washington, D. C.
DEAR SENATOR JACKSON: We are residents
and property owners of the Langley-Great
Falls area of Fairfax County, Va., who are
concerned over the possible construction of
the Central Intelligence Agency headquar-
ters in the neighborhood. On April 7 of
this year CIA announced publicly that It
was giving up any plan to locate in Langley.
Then last week, without notice. language was
written Into a military construction bill
which indicated that CIA was still very much
interested in Langley as a possible site. We
believe there are serious considerations
against locating CIA In Langley that should
be brought to the attention of the Congress.
Langley Is a unique residential area of one-
family homes on large lots, country places,
and farms. There are no apartment build-
ings and virtually no commercial develop-
ment. A large Government office building
will bring great pressure for mass housing,
commercial construction, used-car lots, and
other changes which will destroy the char-
acter of the area.
Fairfax County Is- already hard-pressed to
provide water, sewerage, schools, roads,
police, and other facilities for a rapidly grow-
ing population. Water and sewerage may be
arranged for an office building Itself, but the
great population Increase which will follow
will throw an intolerable burden on the
community. For example, the water table
is already falling in the county, and new
mass housing In an area of individual wells
will lower the table disastrously and dry up
many existing wells.
To erect a large office building on this
river front property and to build a super
highway to it In the name of the George
Washington Memorial Parkway is directly
contrary to the purposes of the Capper-
Crampton Act. The Congress in 1930 author-
ized the acquisition of the river front prop-
erty. including the entire Virginia shore of
the Potomac from below Chain Bridge to a
point above Great Falls. for a memorial
to George Washington and for "the protec-
tion and preservation of the natural scenery
of the Gorge and the Great Falls of the
Potomac" (46 Stat. 482).
The Public Roads tract at Langley with
13,51 miles of riverfront is the only substan-
tial piece of United States property on the
Virginia shore above Chain Bridge available
for park purposes. Other such property is
Increasingly difficult to acquire. As with the
more highly publicized Maryland shore of
the Potomac, the interest of protecting the
wilderness of the river and carrying out the
statutory purposes of the Capper-Crampton
Act must be balanced against the interest of
providing access for the motorist. Neither
consideration, however, suggests that large
Government office buildings should be lo-
cated on potential park land.
The McLean Citizens Association, drawing
its members from the entire area, consid-
ered the problem at a special meeting and
voted to opppose location of a CIA building
in Langley. At a subsequent meeting the
association recommended that park and rec-
reation areas be designated for the area, in-
cluding if possible the bulk of the Public
Roads property at Langley. Of several sites
now being considered by CIA, Langley is the
only one in which the local citizens associa-
tion has objected. In fact, other areas have
pleaded with CIA to locate there and have of-
fered free land and facilities.
No affirmative reason has been offered for
location of a huge Government office build-
ing on potential park land, in the midst of
an entirely residential area, against the
wishes of the community and in the face of
strongly pressed invitations to locate else-
where. CIA has no need to have its employ-
ees work In rural residential surroundings.
To locate in Langley would damage a unique
community with no offsetting gain to CIA.
We are presenting our views in this letter
to make clear that residents of the Langley
area have not changed their opposition to a
CIA building here. After the April 7 state-
ment we assumed that the mattter was
closed. If Langley is again to be consid-
ered by CIA, we wish to be heard. Surely
such a controversial proposal. with its serious
effects on long-established Federal park pol-
icy and on the orderly development of a
community, should receive full and careful
study including an opportunity for all view-
points to be presented.
Respectfully yours,
BENJAMIN LEE BIRD.
0. BowDOIN CaAIGHILL, Jr.
ROGER FISHER.
MANNING GASCH.
ANTHONY LEWIS.
SAMUEL E. NEEL.
CYNTHIA ZIMMERMAN.
Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, I have
a short statement which is a summary
of the conference report, and I ask unan-
imous consent that the statement may be
printed in the RECORD at this point in my
remarks.
There being no objection, the state-
ment was ordered to be printed in the
RECORD, as follows:
STATEMENT BY SENATOR STENNIS ON CoNrEE-
ENCE REPORT ON H. R. 6829, MILITARY CON-
STRUCTION AtrrnoltmAmow BILL
A tabulation showing a comparison of the
authorization contained In this bill as it
passed the House, as it passed the Senate,
and as has been agreed to in conference is
as follows.
house
Senate
Conference
A rnry ............................................................
$651,1 000
4
4.527, 027, 000
$333, 964, 000
Navy ----------------------------------- -------------------------
596,1
0,900
571,820,300
564,224,300
Air Force--------------------------------------------------------
1,165,4!3,000
1,205,170,000
1, 207, 9U2, 000
('liatrman, Joint c'hkfaof S(alf----------------------------------
aW,ODO
--
............... ................
56,000,000?
53,500,000
54,500,900
Total.. .....................................................
2,368,998, 900
2, 357, 317,300
2,360, 530, 300
Approved For Release 2006/10/03: CIA-RDP63T00245R000100180004-7
 Approved For Release 2006/10/03: CIA-RDP63T00245R000100180004-7
1955 NGRESSIONAL RECORD -SENATE 8715
of the
total authorization agreed to in con- possible that a separate bill to authorize e position taken by the Fairfax County
ference is $3,213,000 more than had. been ap- housing for the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Board of County Supervisors. for cOnsid proved by the Senate and $8.468,800 less than eration and be ctionortedthis isession of the With wishes,
yours,
had been approved by the House. CARLTON C. MASSEY,
Executive.
Under the conference agreement the Army Congress.
would receive $533,904,000 or $6,877,000 more There were two changes from the Senate County EMr. THURMOND. Mr. President, I
than had been contai}ed in the bill as, it version of the general provisions contained
passed the Senate. This difference repre- in title V. The Senate conferees agreed to ike to congratulate f
military department stto ofothuld e lconference committe e umembers
C. secretaries of the provision
pon the action on istin-
sents or hospital ei ciilliti aeement Fort Jackson, million
and to $1,877,000 ,000 for cold storage facili- eral acquire
Housing thto ti le guished seniors Senatorbill ssippi
distin-
ties at t Schofield Barracks ks in Hawaii. g Cm . The able and distin-
The Navy would receive authorization in VI or title IX of the National Housing Act, has gUished Senator from Mississippi and his
the less than $564,224,300, the which figure is those cases where the housing units are
committee Se composed of the Senator from
proved 000 l less than Senate had she adequate and suitable for housing military
South tee cos L se. of the the Senator from
on from the personnel and their r dependents. This pro-
Served. This net reduction derives
for providing agreeing the addition of $81,000 vision, as it was as originally to be inserted by the
for providing ding Navy the family quarters in in the the House, was intended t to be complementary to from Washington [Mr. JACKSON], and
District of Columbia and to the addition of a somewhat similar provision authorizing the Senator from Massachusetts [Mr.
fine
toe a very them
$432,000 for a dispensary at Quantico, Va., the secretaries of the military departments SAL ONS and? I perform
with these additions being more than offset to assume, on application by the sponsor,
by reductions of $6,098,000 at Camp Pendle- mortgage obligations on the so-called Wherry for the excellent manner in which they
ton in California; $123,000 at the Naval housing units that had been insured under the bill.
Powder Factory, Indian Head, Md.; and $1,- the provisions of title VIII of the National handled hale of the people of South Caro-
683,000 for land acquisition at Port Chicago, Housing Act. The Senate bill did not con-
Calif. The decision to reduce the authoriza- tain the provision affecting the Wherry hous- lina I should like to say that we are,
tion at Camp Pendleton results from a re- ing units. The House receded from its lan- very appreciative of the consideration
luctance to provide additional facilities there guage authorizing the acquisition of Wherry Fgiven to the ort Jackson S one of the finest instal-
until an adequate water supply for the base housing units and the Senate accepted the Fort training troops, and the -
hos-
is .
assured. The land acquisition at Port House language authorizing the acquisition lations will provide facilities which are
Chicago was deleted, pending on-the-site of title and title IX units.
study badly pneeded rovide there. are very
Y
whether by a subcommittee of f the House Theseec y change the general la-
ethServices Committee determine sons as theovis had passed the Senate relates grateful to the conference committee for,
whether this is land requirement t can be co- to the provision requiring the secretaries of
ordinatd with a similar requirement of the the military departments to come into their action in the matter.
Army in the same area. The relatively agreement with, the Armed Services Commit- qu heoriPRo PRESIDING to the
small reduction at the Naval Powder Factory, tees on the utilization. of certain classified
Indian Head, Md. was made after the De- and overseas construction authorization. report.
partment of the Navy advised that it no This section represented a continuation of The report was agreed to. -
longer required this small item. committee policy adopted originally in 1952. of South Carolina
The Air Force portion of the authorization However, the construction requirements, cost Mr, JOHNSTON of
$1,207,902,040, an increase of $2,732,000 estimates, and base agreements are much said:
over the authorization contained in the bill more firm and definite today than was true Mr. President, I should like to com-
as it passed the Senate. The addition of in 1952, and the Senate agreed to eliminate mend the three Senate conferees on the
$2,732,000 is to provide additional facilities this provision, military construction bill for their suc-
4t the Charleston Air Force Base, S. C. Mr. STENNIS. Mr. President, the cess in retaining certain items
These facilities were originally scheduled in the bill.
,for authorization next year, but were in- conference report substantially follows I wish to say something in behalf of the
depot; and I
that transportation. i$5 illon allowed
'ciuded in this bill in order to "enhance the the bill as passed by the Senate. Charleston
effectiveness of this important base at an With reference to the matter at Lang- for Camp Jackson, is $5 for medical allowed
early date. ley, Va., we did not locate the CIA, build- forties. I Jackso C., fa-
The Senate had provided authorization for ing at Langley. There was no testimony tion of the should Senate like e to hote s stet the medical
that to is
the headquarters installation for the Cen- taken on that point. not Camp Jackson. I fs Fort Jacks
tral Intelligence Agency in a maximum I ask unanimous consent that a letter son. It was made a fort several years
amount of ended0, for o0; he construction of this of from the county executive of the county
surn as buildings. If the headquarters i installation of Fairfax, Va., be printed in the RECORD ago.
Also, I notice that $427,000 has been
Also, for the naval $427,000
reserve
were placed at Langley, Va., $8,500,000 would at this point. Included
the
George been hg for the extension
was There being no ordered to be prntedlin in RECORD, shipyard, Charleston, S. C.; $1,650,000
Par-
George Washington Memorial al were Parkway. chosen, If for the Marine Corps record depot, Par-
a site other than Langley were chose$1 as follows:
.million would have been available for the COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ris Island, S. C.; $4,649,000 for the Ma-
.purchase of the necessary land. The House COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, sine Corps auxiliary air station, Beau-
and provided $50 million for the building, Fairfax, Va., July 7, 1955. fort, S. C.; and $553,000 for community
and the Conferrer agreed Of add $1 million Hon. JOHN C. S'rENNIS, facilities at the Naval Receiving Station,
to the Senate allowance of $45 million for United States Senator, Charleston, S. C.
pertain-
this purpose. maximum Thus, the CIA 54600,000, a Senate Office Building, There are several other items pertain-
which $46 authorization rk$or the con- Washington, D. C.
which $46 million is earmarked for the con- DEAR SENATOR STENNL9: It occurs me that ing to South Carolina, but I shall not go
the Langley site cis finally selected, an addi- it would be'appropriate to advise you of the into them in detail now.
tional $8,500,000 is available for extension position taken by the Board of County Super- I thank the committee of conference
of the George Washington Memorial Park- visors of Fairfax County, Va., relative to for having included these items for
way. If the Langley site is not selected, this possible location of the Central Intelligence South Carolina. I think they are much
-$8,500,000 is not available for authorization, Agency's Office building near Langley in Fair- needed and can well be used in the de-
but $1 million would be available for the fax County. fense of our Nation at this time.
purchase of land. Our board has consistently welcomed the
CIA to this location and has expressed
The House had provided an authorization a
willingness to cooperate in every way pis- MRS. LORENZA O'MALLEY (DE
of $300,000 for mu lesion faci tti quarters sible in providing the facilties which this in- AMUSATEGUI) ET AL.
and related communication fat Staff for the stallation would require in order to make it
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of zed and de- possible for the Langley site to be chosen. The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
assistants. The vonferees recognized the for The board has officially agreed to provide fore the Senate a message from the
suability m providing uiable quarters for sewage disposal for the installation and has House of Representatives announcing its
the Chairman of theJ oint Chiefs, but construction cooperated with the city of Falls Church disagreement to the amendment of the
detail . had ed justification for this Senate, ,and it anthe Virginia Department of Highways been
relief eoto the bill (H. R. O1003) for the
ed In
'Malley (de
the was agreed hat an authorization of this type relative to supplying water and providing Senate
should be separately considered. Only this adequate highway facilities for same. relief ategui),Jose Maria de Malley e(de
morning a subcommittee of the Senate Com- It is my understanding that a decision in mu at and the legal guardian a gui
mittee on Armed Services took testimony on connection with this location will on be O'Malley,
an authorization for this purpose, and it is forthcoming and I am pleased to advise you mon de Amusategui O'Malley, and re-
Approved For Release 2006/10/03: CIA-RDP63T00245R000100180004-7
 Approved For Rpke,,ase 2006/10/03: CIA-R DP63T00245RQ00100180004-7
PMWA
b l lb CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENAT E
questing a conference with the Senate on
the disagreeing votes of the two Houses
thereon.
Mr. KILGORE. I movethat the Sen-
ate Insist upon its amendment, agree to
the request of the Home for a con-
ference, and that the Chair appoint the
conferees on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding officer appointed Mr. KILGORE.
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WELKER,
and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the part of
the Senate.
THOMAS F. HARNEY
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before
the Senate a message from the House of
Representatives announcing its disagree-
ment to the amendment of the Senate
to the bill (H. R. 2907) for the relief of
Thomas F. Harney, Jr., doing business
as the Harney Engineering Co., and re-
questing a conference with the Senate
on the disagreeing votes of the two
Houses thereon.
Mr. KILGORE. I move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
the request of the House for a conference,
and that the Chair appoint the conferees
on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. KILGORE,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WELKER,
and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the part of
the Senate.
ORRIN J. BISHOP
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate a message from the
House of Representatives announcing its
disagreement to the amendment of the
Senate to the bill (H. R. 4249) for the
relief of Orrin J. Bishop and requesting
a conference with the Senate on the dis-
agreeing votes of the two Houses there-
on.
Mr. KILGORE. I move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
the request of the House for a conference,
and that the Chair appoint the con-
ferees on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. KILGORE,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WEL-
ICER, and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the
part of the Senate.
ESTATE OF VICTOR HELFENBEIN
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid before
the Senate a message from the House of
Representatives announcing Its dis-
agreement to the amendment of the Sen-
ate to the bill (H. R. 5078) for the relief
of the estate of Victor Helfenbein, and
requesting a conference with the Senate
on the disagreeing votes of the two
Houses thereon.
Mr. KIL+GORE. I move that the Sen-
ate insist upon its amendment, agree to
the request of the House for a conference,
and that the Chair appoint the con-
ferees on the part of the Senate.
The motion was agreed to; and the
Presiding Officer appointed Mr. KILGORE,
Mr. MCCLELLAN, Mr. DANIEL, Mr. WELKER,
and Mr. BUTLER conferees on the part of
the Senate.
DONALD HECTOR TAYLOR
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill
(S. 26) for the relief of Donald Hec-
tor Taylor, which was, in line 7, after
"fee" insert "Provided, That a suitable
and proper bond or undertaking, ap-
proved by the Attorney General, be de-
posited as prescribed by section 213 of the
said act."
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to provide for the
posting of a bond, as a guaranty that the
beneficiary will not become a public
charge.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
LUPE M. GONZALEZ
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
36) for the relief of Lupe M. Gonzalez,
which was, to strike out all after the en-
acting clause and Insert:
That the Attorney General Is authorized
and directed to discontinue any deportation
proceeding and to cancel any outstanding or-
der and warrant of deportation, any war-
rant of arrest and bond which may have
been Issued In the case of Lulu M. Gozalez,
and the said Lupe M. Gonzalez shall not
again be subject to deportation by reason
of the same facts upon which any such de-
portation proceedings were commenced or
any such warrants of arrest have issued.
Mr. KILGORE. The amendment of
the House Is to merely cancel outstand-
ing deportation proceedings rather than
granting the status of permanent resi-
dence to the beneficiary.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House:
The motion was agreed to.
ANNA C. GIESE
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
244) for the relief of Anna C. Giese,
which was in line 7, after "fee" insert
"under such conditions and controls
which the Attorney General, after con-
sultation with the Surgeon General of
the United States Public Health Service,
Department of Health, Education, and
Welfare. may deem necessary to im-
pose.,,
Mr. KILGORE. The House amend-
ment provides that the Surgeon General
may impose such conditions as he may
deem necessary, inasmuch as the bene-
ficiary has been afflicted with tuber-
culosis.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
RELIEF OF CERTAIN ALIEN SHEEP-
HERDERS
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
633) for the relief of certain alien sheep-
herders, which was, on page 1, line 5,
strike out "Panaglatis Demitreos Zeras,".
July 11
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to delete the
name of one of the beneficiaries inas-
much as he has departed from the United
States.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
MARION S. QUIRK
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
758) for the relief of Marion S. Quirk,
which was, on page 1, line 7, after "fee"
insert ", under such conditions and con-
trols which the Attorney General, after
consultation with the Surgeon General
of the United States Public Health Serv-
ice, Department of Health, Education,
and Welfare, may deem necessary to
Impose."
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to provide that
the Surgeon General may impose such
conditions as he may deem necessary,
Inasmuch as the beneficiary has been
afflicted with tuberculosis.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
ELISEU JOAQUIM BOA
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
1654) for the relief of Eliseu Joaquim
Boa, which was, to strike out all after
the enacting clause and insert:
That, notwithstanding the provisions of
section 212 (a) (9) and (19) of the Immi-
gration and Nationality Act, Eliseu Joaquim
Boa may be admitted to the United States
for permanent residence if he is found to be
otherwise admissible under the provisions
of that act: Provided, That these exemptions
shall apply only to grounds for exclusion of
which the Department of State or the De-
partment of Justice had knowledge prior to
the enactment of this act.
Mr. KILGORE. The bill has been
amended by the House to grant a waiver
to the beneficiary of the bill, rather than
granting the status of permanent resi-
dence. This waiver will enable the bene-
ficiary to qualify for a visa as the hus-
band of a lawfully resident alien.
I move that the Senate concur in the
amendment of the House.
The motion was agreed to.
DR. LUCIANO A. LEGIARDI-LAURA
The PRESIDING OFFICER laid be-
fore the Senate the amendment of the
House of Representatives to the bill (S.
467) for the relief of Dr. Luciano A.
Legiardi-Laura, which was, to strike out
all after the enacting clause and insert:
That. for the purposes of the Immigration
and Nationality Act. Dr. Luciano A. Legi-
ardi-Laura shall be held and considered to
have been lawfully admitted to the United
States for permanent residence as of the date
of the enactment of this act, upon payment
of the required visa fee. Upon the granting
of permanent residence to such alien as pro-
vided for In this act, the Secretary of State
shall Instruct the proper quota-control offi-
cer to deduct one number from the appro-
Approved For Release 2006/10/03: CIA-RDP63T00245R000100180004-7