LETTER TO HONORABLE ALLEN W. DULLES FROM CLARKE AND RAPUANO

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
24
Document Creation Date: 
December 16, 2016
Document Release Date: 
August 31, 2004
Sequence Number: 
20
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
October 20, 1955
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0.pdf1.76 MB
Body: 
Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 GILMORE D. CLARKE-MICHAEL RAPUANO CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 145 EAST 32nd STREET NEW YORK 16 -r 20, 1955 Central Tatefligence Agency L 250 DO ce You directed us to make a study of certain suggested headquarters building for the Central Intelligence Le we have done and we present herewith our findings. Fo the report appended herewith, we shall submit, , appendices to it to cover, in some deta, the factual cti automobile traffic arteries, water supply, sewage telephone. electric light and power services. Agency Staff; ,his opportunity to thank all those, outside of entral Intelligence Agency, who assisted us in this study. Very truly yours, Our appreciation to Deputy Director Clarke and Rapuano Mbmore D. Clarke Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 ce Agenc the ,e Central Intelligence Agency REPORT ON THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR A NEW HEADQUARTERS FOR THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AC NCY we with a request from the Director of the a prepared this report, with rec~ Aresee+d peace among the free nations functions in all parts of the world i., as a a aig much as ent fact . It is Mr under , portant fact-gathering Organization. In these circcu stances, we believe d provide upon a suitable site d setting should be set apart frown t1a buildings of other public a,encies in order 1perative security n easures IUSTORY OF THE C with the least effort and expense. ' A ENC er to help us better to understand the problem, brief history of the C. I. A. prepared by a member of 1 incorporate it herewith in this report. Central Intelligence Agency w a iinteUig e rowth of the perlenc a of World Iaar U and particularly the :1 investigal into the surprise attack at Pearl Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIAI-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 iarbor. The aim was to ca responsibility in one place. No such func! Government before World War IL Its formal beginni was an executive order of January ZZ, 194, creating Central Intelligence Group. After a period of consideration by the Congr Central Int ellig enc e A stablished by erection 102 of the National Security Act of 1947. functions in the Executive Order am statute are substantially the same, but under the statute the former Group became an dependent Executive Agency of the Administrative Branch of the Govern stated that, for the purpose of coordinating the intelligence activities of the several Government departments and agencies in the interest of national security. it shall be the duty of the Agency, under the direction of the Nation xncil, to advise and make recommendations to the National Secu Council on intelligence activities relating to nation to correlate and. evaluate intelligence relating to nation security, and to provide for its appropriate dissemination to perform additional services of common. concern to the igence agencies; and such other functions and duties related to intelligence as the Nati .curity Council may direct. The Agency is prohibited from any lase-enforcems police, or internal-security fun the departs Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA_ -RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 once agencies are continued by statute in the 9. However, the Director of Central Intelligence r protecting intelligence sources an, authorized disclosure. The Agency has now evolved from a a cup into its full stature in the cortex field of foreign e. In so doing, it has become a most un tssu l and complicated organization. Its end products are national net estimates to assist the President and his top- policy planners in their decisions for the future of the country. Such estimates must be based. an the rn.+ complete and most up-t rotation available. Any cation, or person may be the subject of an estimate involved in most estimates. The mechanical cllection, handling, indexing, dissemination. and analysis sa a formidable task and requires many specialists and special equipment. The evaluation process brings to bear the best informed and most expert knowledge in the Government e vast amount of available information before an evaluation problems under consideration. This is again formidable- a process of coordination requiring the interrelation of all governmental intelligence facilities. All of this work is pe eampl ed behind a .tes the probie on of security, which additic coordination and communications. Elaborate compartmentation is necessary both for for individuals to a degree far greater than in. any other activity, Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIIRDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 r private, and yet this coaipartmentation must .e free and rapid flow of information who have a need for it. Many subjects cann be discussed on the telephone so that coordinating equi be within convenient distance. Documents may no :tended and must be escorted in transit. es unusual amounts of vault and safe space and . Cyaf ary tr secu each component within the site unauthorized entry. oxide assur: The Central intelligence Agency has a heavy res to the national defense and security; c for of Central Intelligence bears the final responsibility for the national intelligence mission. To m zation in which the pri able,, tly as their surroundings will permit and unnecessary involves a eed is, o ative personnel. But, the people can work delay in physical processing may have serious resul to coordinate in a timely manne a security compromise may have grave consequences. ,qtly, the plarming for and design of housing for this Agency present problems that would not be encountered other building, public or private. Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIARDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 347. Ova the be reqai wk that e t _ atUve. d4 bave I to prepare ar to A - , Due* In the area Uving, 4, 000 *ot s - . adeqwA Zero a e. Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 5 be secess"y t Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 consideration was narrowed to six and subseque inspected the six sites and certain others esideration. o. Nevertheless, r judgment, were one or both members of this firm visited the sites which set the established criteria and subsequ of the staff of the Agency the advantages and the d site.(See Map #1) On Wednesday, September 21, we conducted a hearing at the Head- quarters of the Agency at which time we listened to the proponents of four of the dch received serious consideration. The proponents of each one of these sites were cooperative in giving us dat e might be informed concerni form of inapt an ilems of each one of these result of our studies, we also narrowed our consideration to two sites; the o Langley. Virginia and the other, known as the Wier e, situated in the City of Alexandria along hway approximately vest of Seminary Road, Both of these sites were inspected in field on several, occasions and problem selves to era and, more particularly, to the physical character of the sites re given the most careful study. We discussed the problems related to the development of these two sites with a member, or members, of the staffs of the C. I. A. and the National Capital Plan nnin LOCATI of the National Capital Regional Planning Council. ESIDENCES OF STAFF MEMBERS one of the most important factors that merits especially care: consideration is the relationship between the places of residence of the employees C. I. A. and the proposed headquarters site. We were reliably informed Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIAO-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 annual turn-over of eploy other govern considering is aubstautts encciess, taken for the body of for any other ever saes, the turn-over t agency. A large percentage of these staff members own their own homes and they have more or loss dedicated themselves to service with the C. LA. until retirement even though they are not under the Civil Service regulations. Since this is a highly specialized area of endeavor, the staff members are especially well qualified and, in most cases, . hly trained for service with this Agency. In the circ East, 7%; Southwest, which the majority may reach the headquarters site is an important governing its selection. We find that the places of residence (See Map #2) of both staff and a1 employees are distributed at the present time as follows: In the District of Columbia- Northwest. 37%; NorthEasst, 50% of the employees. In the State of Vi County, 8%; City of Alexandria, Arlington County, uce Uiam, County, .04%; County, ., 02%; for a total of 31, b% of the employeess. In the State of Montgomery County, Ibis; Prince George County, 7%; City of Arundel County, . 1 for a total of 18.4% of the employees. We learned that 550% of all the employees rr.ied employees own their own homes. Based upon these data, at less than for ogees as a whole. In A and that 2576 more convenient for the employees of the C. I.A,. to reach the Langley site, following the construction of the highway, parkway, and related improvements, including supply and sewage disposal, that are essential before this site can be d be for them to reach the Wier or, in fact, any other Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : C A-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 consideration. In the case of the Winkler site, for example, a n the District of Columbia would be forced to pass through g and evening. ason network at the busiest hours of the with the traffic going to and departing Pentag I &I Highway has now more than reached its capacity. and, as far south as King Street, it will still be inadequate to e concentrated peak load that would result fra 3, 000 automobiles of the C. LA. Headquarters staff dur DESCRIPTION OF THE LANGL The Langley site in situated in Fairfax County and consists of 140 acres of a acre tract owned by the Federal Government. The center of this large tract of land to approximately 7- I /Z miles, as the crow flies, tone. The westerly boundary is along Ti un the northe easterly boundary is the Potomac River and borders private lands fr River to the Leesburg Read, which of this tract are under th iction of th ndary. /67S- rks Service and extend slong the wooded banks of the Potomac River extending back from the River a distance of More than 1, 000', an area that will accommodate C*MfOrtAN of the George Washington Memorial Parkway. The remainder of the rising S$,Z acres, is under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Public is agency has developed a small part of the center of the site as a eh laboratory. of the Bureau has expressed a willingness to relinquish the use of 140 acres of the tract, now under the Bureau's jurisdiction, for the development of the C. 1. A. Headquarters, Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA--DP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 the C. LA. Headquarters should be situated on this site, it will occupy part of a Government Reserves 582 acres. Any development for the C. LA. within this site will be such that a wide belt of forest 1=4 will be left around the periphery in a manner aiding to provide the desiir, it is safe to as*ume that the proposed C.I.A. 140 acre tract governmental property, will be enclosed with a security fence. this larger 0 2191 above mean sea The soil conditi esslty of using piles. dfffe in elevation within the area utilised by the architects in the development of the site as to take fun advantage ACCESS TO THE LA GLEY SITE The principal access to the site from the Distric' e Leesburg Road (Route 123); this artery is now inadequate. essary, as contemplated in Public Law 161 - 1st Sea sion - HR 6829) to extend the George Washington M*mwW Parlay from. its present terminus at Spout Run, approximately 3/4 of a mile been completed. Monies have been made available to start parkway, providing for a total of four lanes (two in each idge, to the Langley site. It is understood that preliminary burg Road from the Chain Bridge and the junction of .d to the site. This road should be developed ultimately as a separated e artery and Chain Bridge should be widened to provide for six lanes with o the proposed new du e east side of the -tomac River. Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 9 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 of the pro situated j d the Washington Metropvlit crossing o: an element in Counties in the State of Maryland. ca0assiecting with a second crossing of the Potomac via the proposed Jones Point Bridge i edia el ;reek. p Freeway, a part of the Inters bridg the city is completed the Langley site will be situated close to the Virginia of the Cabin John Bridge crossing and hence make th, essible from all points in the States of Maryland as from the District of C+ nmbla. Until such time as the Outer Loop is constructed, the Ion ey site, inasmuch as it will serve the C.I.A. Headquarters, Parkway, reaching up to the site along the west bank of the Potomac. will prove to be adequate as a means of access to and egress rge W Spout Ran. When the Outer Loop is constructed, due to the additional traffic that will be generated, to build traffic lane on the northbound drive between the Langley site and the proposed Cabin ~n Bridge, and an additional traffic lane on the southbound drive between the site rder adequately to move the automobiles off of the site in via an appropriate crossing elution structure over or parkway. With the initial construction of the park iect that we have designated for an ultimate width of three lanes be graded to acco three lanes; only two need be construe iime as the Cabin John Bridge is built. Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIAFDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 ex the :strict a: posed dual highway along the old Baltimore the proposed outer loop freeway at the Cabin John Bridge crossing of the Potomac., will afford an additional artery of co between the Langley site and the center of the National apitasl and thus provide the site with an additional arterial e 14ouse, the Pentagon and the State Department. ,ia it will, become necessary, ultimately,. to improve Route 1Z3 that leads directly from the Langley site, at its junction with the :t ,eesburg Road (Route 193), to and through M, c.Lean, Lewins ille and Tysons Corner, where it crosses the Leesburg Pike (Route 7). A related improvement that will serve as an added measure of assistance otive travel, for those n the Langley site and the District of proposed widening of the Francis Scott Key Bridge from four ach direction) and the proposed connections between this br and the George Washington Memorial Parkway. These improvements will measurably help those who may travel between the. center of the Capital City Langley. detail the ix t'_ ' the National Park Service), that will connec ay and freeway network extending southerly from up, attached to this report, sets forth in mar tore and requirements related to arterial matters. DEVELOPMENT THE LANGLEY SITE Now that the Bureau of Public Roads has indicated its willingness to the C. 1. A. 140 acres of land out of the tract under its jurisdiction at the coverage of structures an this 140 acre tract will. be e=eei negligible in relation to the total government. reservation of Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 R40 acre pme a of o is =are 1a a ; C. L A. by of LA. ma at ** 1, t**VUY cm, nber of ev*eyegm (over 11 parcent of the *rqA*ye*a at present use the parkway In a to and r r ot whedwr mw* Man a very few of the Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 12 Wore Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Ow =ODA 4 largest 3 r. -: rs"t auf an to **Ring, a fang w live VIM Lod Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 1 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 ass the pr t pu County zoning scheme as at present planned, then thee: need be no cause for concern. a as the C.1. A. ld not be mad C c Board Supervisors of the C, !. A. is a desirable nei e C, LA. to Fairfax County under its own responsibilities". ,ROVZME offered Lde in Fairfax County, by reason tte( tim, e County. If e of Fair. course t side of the Potomac River to the proposed Cabin Se Crossing before the Ct. A .. -ressed its intention to build a new ;ley site is selected the par' have been. The other hli utility improver related to water supply for the leer site has been the ass tired Col y on parts We have ass information contained in Mr$ James White Earl of Appe task seriou halo but become a distinct d more detailed data to 4, 1955; 'se letter to titter. Mr; adequacy of the water supply that the Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-Pf P63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 site. See 1*4 to a iSpGs-jI fir the" y on Oux par! imestmbled additional data to -ends for such sorvic a at cages here Ike Countj by Mr. arlt - C. she subject. ?aI G1 T AND POWElk :utllv* of cases but on they did *9 d as related to er . the c#t aidaratle" t Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 W ' I tract. The cif r 1erati tt do with the physical Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 He Natim's most t *11L It 'W Lars, WO a oft*. h r lands t-wo sides government land to the l td dewng rye as a protect** ff ,.a dd deal&bte f a c t o r . Agency is divisim additlawl Away In .e raw buildings Ike this site of kingto r etr tt M&OU the eaa%ished criteria. We uji; Approved For Release 2004/09/23?,,CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RpP63T00245R000100170020-0 APPENDIX J Congressional References 1. Military and.Naval Construction Act (P.L.,82-155, September 28, 1951). For CIA building authorization in the amount of $38,000,000 see Title IV, Sec. 401, under the cover of the Secretary of the Air Force. There was no testi- mony by CIA witnesses on this bill. (This authorization was repealed by Sec. 511, P.L. 84-161). See also: a. Report, No. 767, from the House Armed Services Committee, July?26, 1951. Report notes (p. 19) that all projects in Sec. 401 are classified; therefore, there is no specific reference to CIA construction which was ap- proved under Air Force cover. b. Report, No. 727, from the Senate Armed Services,Committee, September 4, 1951. Report notes (p. 16) that all projects in Sec. 401 are classified; therefore there is no specific reference to CIA construction which was approved under Air Force cover. (-r ~ ?n, ~~.> ll.n N. c. Report, No. 1036, from the Senate Appro- priations Committee, October 18, 1951 (to accompany H.R. 5650, Second Supplemental Appropriation Bill, 1952). Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 d. Conference Report,' No. 1226, October 20, 1951, (Senate and House Appropriations Com mitteesconferees). (To accompany H.R. 5650). 2. Military Construction Act of 1955 (P L. 84-161, July 15, 1955). For authorization to construct a CIA headquarters installation,. see Title IV, Sec. 401 and Title V:, Secs. 501, 502 A' 504. See also: a. Hearings, Military Public Works Construction, May-June 1955, before the Subcommittee on Real Estate and Military Construction of the Senate Committee on Armed Services. For CIA testimony, June 7, 1955, see pp. 536-549. (Testimony before the. House Armed Services Committee on this subject was in.executive session and not printed) 76 Report, No. 865, from the House Armed Services Committee, June 20, 1955. Committee approval at pp. 14,-17 in the amount of $56,000,000.0 c. Report, No. 694, from the Senate Armed Services Committee, June 30, 1955. Committee approval at pp. 2, 14-15, 16 in the amount of $53,500,000. ~c r~tcc.~ //./r'? fie' J~ d. Conference Report, House No. 1083, July 7, 1955, (Senate and House Armed Services Com- mittees conferees). Approval at pp. 28-29 C7d-.4~J''? '~'~ ~, in the amount of $55,000,000. Approved For Release 2004Tb~T23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 3. Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1956 (P.L. 84-219, August 4, 1955). For CIA building partial appropriation, see Chapter III. See also: a. Hearings, Military Construction Appropriations for 1956, June 1955, before the Subcommittee on Department of Defense Appropriations of the House Committee on Appropriations. For CIA testimony, June 23, 1955, see pp. 165-181. b. Communication from the President of the United States transmitting a draft of a praosed provision pertaining to the Central Intel- ligence Agency,.... House Document No. 210, July 1, 1955. c. Hearings, The Supplemental Appropriation Bill, 1956, June-July 1955, before the Senate Committee on Appropriations. For CIA testimony, July 15, 1955, see pp. 24, 48-49, 239-275, 278-.k0~-316, 363. ~, i/.2. -2 ';74 d. Report, No. 1116, from the House Committee on Appropriations, July 12, 1955. Approval ,at pp. 14, 34 in the amount of $3,000,000 for the preparation of detail plans and specifications for the building. ~T~CUTMr~ i'. 7x 7j). e. Report, No. 1094, from the Senate Committee on Appropriations, July 23, 1955. Approval at pp.11, 53, 69 in the amount of $7,000,000. %,7274. -3- Approved For Release 2004/09/23 CIA-RDP63TD0245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23: CIA-RDP63T.00245R000100170020-0 f. Conference Report, House No. 1586, July 29,1955, (Senate and House Appropriations 'Committees conferees). Approval at pp. 2, 8 in the amount of $5, 500, 000. (To accompany'H. R. 7278). 4. Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1957 (P. L. 84-814, July. 27, 1956). For CIA building appropriation in the amount of $49, 000, 000, see Chapter III, p. '3. See also: a. Hearings, The Supplemental Appropriation Bill, 1957, Vol. 1, May-June 1956, before the House Committee on Appropriations. For CIA testimony before the Sub- committee on Department of Defense Appropriations, see pp. 238-306. b. Hearings, The Supplemental Appropriation Bill, 1957, May-July 1956, before the Senate Committee on Appropriations. For CIA testimony, July 11, 1956, see pp. 719-776. (To accompany H. R. 12138). c. Report, No. 2638, from the House Committee on Appropriations. July 7, 1956. Approval of appro- priation ,for the CIA building.in the amount of $49, 000, 000 at pp. 8, 36. (To accompany H. R. 12138). Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RQP63T00245R000100170020-0 d. Report, No. 2580, from the Senate Committee on Appropriations, July 14, 1956. Approval of appro- priation for the CIA building in the amount of $49, 000,000 at pp. 5, 31.( To accompany H. R. 12138). e. Report House No. 2864, (Senate and House Apprppriations Committees conferees). (To accompany H. R. 12138). Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 ;5X1 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Next 9 Page(s) In Document Exempt Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0 TRANSMITTAL SLIP DATA TO: Le is. Counsel. ROOM NO. BUILDING REMARKS: FROM: ROOM NO. BUILDING EXTENSION I RM N5 241 REPLACES FORM 36-8 FEB WHICH MAY BE USED. Approved For Release 2004/09/23 : CIA-RDP63T00245R000100170020-0