THE KURDS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP63-00314R000200180010-2
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 9, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 22, 1998
Sequence Number: 
10
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 1, 1960
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP63-00314R000200180010-2.pdf300.25 KB
Body: 
DP63 -00314R000200 80010-2 The Kurds as an armed :ores do not pose a threat to the present Fovertrents of Iran and Iraq. The Kurds are poorly equipped, poorly' organised, and in the broad picture possess only harassment potential. In the event of the collapse of the rovernments in Teheran and i4fhded the Kurds have the potential to take control of their respective areas. 3141arly? if the Iranian and Iraqi armies are erwe-ed in non-Kurdish areas to the point of withdrawin7 substantial numLers of troops from northern garrisons, the liurds would encounter little opposition to separatist activities. The Mahabad Republic W83 formed with joviet Jupport at a time when Iran found itself unable to direet political activities. 41ou1d circumstances permit, the Soviet union is probably ready once er4fin to extend active support to a Kurdish independence movement. The danger lies .not in a purely Kurdish effort, but in a Nurdieh nationalist movement supported by the Soviet Union. Iran, like Turkey, is probably more concerned with Kurdish nationalism than it is willing to admit. Iran 'a dis.VOK organization closely observinr Kurdish vxtivities to detect and snuff out indepenience activities. Kurdish leaders fleeing from Iraq have been welcomed in ;ran with the aim of collectin7 prominent Kurds, isolating them, and thus putting to an end Kurdish nationalistic agitation for an independent Kurdistan. A more lenient Kurdish policy in Iraq hes slowed the flight of refugees into Iron and many of the refurees have returned, although a number of leaders remain in Iran. Iran is, however, reluctant to permit the overt migretion of the well Organiied Iraqi section of the herki tribe into traditional !--rsiging' grounds northwest of_Rezaieh. Parti Demokrst Kuri switetors frog Iraq are said to te active in border ares of iranian Kurdistan, and sore move- ment of lranian Kurds into Iraq is permitted with_ the hope of securing , - - in1orm0q04,06 activity aglow- Iraqi Kurds.; Althourh there is no indication.that iron is stirring up trouble in Iraqi Kurdistan, Iranian Eurds are capable of creatinrr disturbancesin Iraq if urred to do so by their government. lbel: 140,C 4 commom leadership is a stumblin, block to an - _ effe0.4YIPOr2ti3t state. tio Kurdish leader has ever had the stature to 00;0444.A.USiversa3. following across Kurdistan. Meetings of Kurdish leader save been reported and it is evident that the Soviets are active in Kurdistan, but a firm picture of alil?tments As not available. The Kurds of 4,17an .dislike the central governheht but many recall the performaPee of the Soviet Union durins,,thejeys of the Mahabad Republic; , ECRfi e 1#99/0941ei-dA-RDP63-00314R000200180010-2 moot Kurdish lesdire in Iraq do not senpert the saim aovernment mai at the same time diatrust the doviet Union. A number of Kurdish leaders mi kit join .and initially cooperate with a SovieteeupOorted independence movement if tangible evidence of .4eviet rood faith were forthcomina. How lone independent leaders would continue to back a centrally controlled effort is a matter of epeculation. soviet support and direction could be a unifyine factor amone the Kurds, but this same outside direction could create conditions intolerable to Xurdieh leaders who joined an independence movement to escape non-urdish, authority. Mulls Mustafe brzri, althourh not well liked personally, is apparently active in Kurdish affair's at the present time. "e is reportedly in contact with many Kurdish leaders and his nave has bean linked with clandestine free Kurdiatan movements tn Iran and Turkey. His loyalty to COUSOS other than his awn political navancement is doubtful. He has apparently had differences with the aommuniet Party of Iraq, hut has probebly maintained his contact with the 3ov1et Union. His uneasy relationship with the aovernment of Iraq would probobly disinteprate if Arab nationalist pressures on Kurdish areas are increased. It is reported that ahould 43SiM fall, Barsani will break with the aovernment of Iraq. His relationship with othetaKurds is similarly Uneasy -- even a portion of the Bersani tribe is anti Mulls Mustafa -- and to stay politically alive he will proWaly continue to espouee Kurdish independence and to avail hiMself of the oraanisational advantaves of a close relationship with the Soviet Union. iteports of air delivery of 3aviet arms to Iraqi Kurdistan and of the dietribu- tion of 3aviet arms to Kurdish tribesmen may indicate that .11-11a Muetafa is being used to inject 3oviet influence into andl independence movement.