IMPLEMENTATION OF IAC-D-50/5

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP61S00750A000700060025-0
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 17, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 11, 1999
Sequence Number: 
25
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
January 26, 1956
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP61S00750A000700060025-0.pdf91.27 KB
Body: 
Approved For Release 20 26 January 1956 X=pANDUM FOR: Special Assistant to the Director for Planning and Coordination ATTENTION 25X1A9a FROM : Chief, Intelligence Information Staff, ORR SUBJECT : Implementation of IAC-D-50/5 REFERENCE : Your Memo dated 12 January 1956 1. Discussion within ORB has indicated skepticism as to the feasibility or value of the extensive questionnaire-type survey outlined in your memorandum. The chief areas of doubt center around the following: a. Difficulty in determining precisely that action is or is not "related to" DCID-4/5? b. Uncertainty that the assembling of voluminous data on individual requirements would lead to conclusions which would justify the expenditure of effort. c. Concern that emphasis on methods and machinery may overshadow what is our chief interest, namely that results shall be effective. 2. Translation of PFNIO's into research projects is perhaps the chief basis for developing the ORR research program. Up to this point, the basic Directive is fairly clearly identifiable. Further spelling out into requirements and collection, however, can be measured as "right" or "wrong" on~y in terms of adequacy in supporting research tasks which are themselves worthy of priority attention. 3. The general reviewing of all requirements and collection activities would seem to lie outside the original instructions to Mr. Bissell, and would possibly not add significantly to the solution of bona fide priority problems. Since we do have at hand certain recognized areas of at least partial failure on important intelligence targets, it might be of more immediate value to use these as a starting point. I refer specifically to the NIE post-mortem state- ments, the RIC Deficiency Surveys, and the requirements which are now routinely developed following completion of each ORB research project. Approved For Release 2000/0 1 S0075U000100OeO -0 0075OA000700060025-0 Approved For Release 200010a126.: CJ -RDP61 SM75OA000700060025-0 14. A survey plan might include the following steps: a. Question to each agency or research office on research programs developed in response to PNIO's. b. Question to each committee, agency, or research office on mechanisms to assure collection action responsive to the priority research program. c. Question to each committee, agency, or research office on adequacy of efforts to fill-identified priority gaps. d. A general questionnaire to agencies aM collection offices on the impact of FNIO's on requirements reaching them and their reaction thereto. e. Specifically, are requirements better suited to your activities if they are clearly identified with DCID-4/5 and/or an agreed statement by an interagency committee? 25X1A9a Approved For Release 2000/08/26 CIA-RDP61 SO075OA000700060025-0