APPLICATION OF CRYPTO SECURITY LAW

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
May 6, 2002
Sequence Number: 
38
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 22, 1955
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4.pdf353.3 KB
Body: 
Approved ForRelease2002/06/24 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4 OGC REVIEW COMPLETED cool a study of the Crypto Security 790, with particular reference the Administrative practices and ammonia= presents a brief analysis of of the lay1 together vith several recommendations con- of CIA and, to some extent, other agencies and depart- sod, bov*vor, that the legal points are not La intended here is to suggest certain steps be veil advised to take ie'order to strengthe in the evert a prosecution under the Act is of Section 798, Which is included in the Espionese Titli 3$ is stated in the title of Pan 513 as folloem: further the security of the United State by sclosures of intonation concerning the crygtogsvphic systems and the communication intelligence activities of tbe United State," The sUbstatme of the Act, set out in 84h-section (a) of Section 7980 is St one commits en offense to knceingly &Ad villinglys "casmmeicatee, furnishes traipswite, or otherwise sakes available to an unauthorised person, or publishes or 'sub My MAW prejudicial to the safety or interest et the Dotted States or for the benefit of any foreign gevernMest to the detriment of the United States any elassified information - CO comcerning the nature, preparation, or use of any omit, cipher, or cryptographic system of the United States or any foreign government riereinafter referred to as CRTP121; =tea the design, construction, use, mantenence, repair of may device, apparatus, or efflience used or pre- pared or planned for uso by the United States or any foreign or communication intelligence as CRTPTO devices and Approved For Release 2002/06/24 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4 Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4 trittallepawfjictivities imertiment rter Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4 Approved For Release 2002/06/24 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4 the latter two eoneern "informstion respecting the =tint defense" and "InformatiOn relating to the national defense", as contrasted with infer- metimShieb "le, for reasons of national security, specifically designated tly a 'kited States Government agency for limited or restricted dissemina- tion or distribution% The former letepage its held by the Ogre= Court ef the United Stites, in 0274% v?UJ. 312 U.S. 104 61 8. Ct. has, to in- volve a question of fact, that is the 4ury must &etersdne Whether the acts of the defendent "are connected with or related to the national de- fense" (61 S. Gt. 1:36). Thus, in prosecutions under those sections it is neassaary to prove connection with the national defense, a resuirement which could be aribarretesing, if applied to inftwation classified "for rating of atonal security", since in such oases the prosecution would have to submit the very inferred= (and presumably much more) the dissemi- nation of ehich lad been restricted by an agency of the Goverment "for moons of national eecurity". Although it is not free from doubt, it is believed that tSar Section 798 it vould not be necessary to sutedt to the 4ury, or to prove, the cplestion of *ether the designation "ter reascms of natianal security" vas correct one; proof that the designation as ende and that the agency which =de it did eo for reasons which the agency regarded as 'reasons of =tint secimitym ghoul:lb. all that is required. The infOrmetion wbich Is pertinent under Sections 793 and 794 is referred to in these actions by a generic term - information "'tweeting the national defense" or "relsting to the naticial defense". Information which is the basis of an indictneett pay or logy not fall vithin the generic tors; scaeone's opinion (the jury's) lust be obtained and accepted. The phrase by which Section 756 refers to the it?tmamtion Which is significant thereunder covers informs- tion vith respect to vbich a particular action has been taken, i.e., infor- Ilatimlehieb sgovernment agency has specifisally designateda certain way rev t oortain reason. The only question resUiring an opinion by the jury is *ether such action occurred, not whether should have occurred. Any eemtention to the contrary is believed refuted by the fact that its accept- ant' VOuld render the statute =enforceable in maw casesasince security sioesideatiCas dwObtlens Would lovretude the Governs:ea frma introducing into evidence informetion to establish "reasons of national security". Since the plain intent of the statute is to protect the cam' and CPTPTO syirtemis by establishing offenses and punishments for the violation thereof, an interpretetion which would defeat such intent should be avoided. any event, It the above analysis is incorrect, that is if the jury' veuld be allowed to judge *ether the Agency correctly designated informa- tion "for reason: of nationel security" there appears to be nothing to be An about it except to decide, *.never a one is ready to go to trial,. tether vs ere prepared to make available records and information to be introduced as evidence. But in order to take advantage of the statute in the event the above analysis to correct, it is believed= would be well advised to dosignate documents in the language of the statute. for this pur pose, a stamp rending as follows, could be used: or reasons Of ratioral security, this document is specifically designated by the Central TnteLligence Agery for limited or restricted disessedration or distribution. Approved For Release 2002/06/24 : CIA-RDP59-00882R000100210038-4 -"" Approved For Release 2002/06/24 : ClAtr51118182R000100210038-4 swim islet whips oesuldlo achieved by a regu- (or CUPTO) cleazied-yeeple would midi they would ? the regulation in aadition to making reference prtmide that all collzat (or 011tYPTO) documents will owe Or a win or code voids that tie di/semi- gni document hearing spy or the code word* is the Central Internam:ice Agency for reasons of 25X1 ion along the :authcrize6 dent or bi communication ir directive, authorised to boaever (for one. To es require the or COMM devices or the ?vities to authorize OGC:REL:iss to receive such inrcastion. Distribution Orig. & 1 - addressee Snbjectfr Signer Chrono cc: DOM cc: Office of Communications cc; psecytitij-Sec14,144-Croatirriepettentr aitto icat opa cusity- ApprovedForRearA205/24:1;1A-RD 9- 882R 00100 10 38-4