MILITARY THOUGHT (TOP SECRET): 'THE ROLE OF SPACE WEAPONS IN A FUTURE WAR', BY LIEUTENANT-GENERAL N. KORENEVSKIY

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP33-02415A000500190011-3
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
T
Document Page Count: 
25
Document Creation Date: 
December 12, 2016
Document Release Date: 
January 8, 2002
Sequence Number: 
11
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 7, 1962
Content Type: 
MF
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP33-02415A000500190011-3.pdf1.29 MB
Body: 
25X1A CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 25X1A NRO COMPLETED MEMORANDUM FOR: The Acting Director of Central Intelligence SUBJRCT MILITARY THOUGHT (TOP SECRET): "The Role of Space Weapons in aaFuture War", by Lieutenant-General N. Korenevskiy 1. Enclosed it, a verbatim translation of an article which appeared in the TOP SECRETS ecial Collection of Articles of the Journal "Military Thought" oYenna a ss pu is,cT By the Ministry o Defense, USSR, and distributed down to the level of Army Commander. 25X1A 25X1A Requests for extra copies of this report or for u i..iza ion of any part of this document in any otncr torm should be addressed to the originating office. 25X1A 25X1A Richard Helms Deputy Director (Plans) 25X1A Enclosure Copy No. 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and Approved For Release 2002/ Ci~02415A000500190011- declassification 25X1A 25X1A (E- 1-02415A0005.Qp190011-3 Original: The Acting Director of Central Intelligence cc: The Director of Intelligence and Research, Department of State The Director, Defense Intelligence Agency The Director for Intelligence, The Joint Staff The Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the Army The Director of Naval Intelligence Department of the Navy The Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, U. S. Air Force The Director, National Security Agency Director, Division of Intelligence Atomic Energy Commission National Indications Center Chairman, Guided Missiles and Astronautics ,/Intelligence Committee /Deputy Director for Research Deputy Director for Intelligence Assistant Director for National Estimates Assistant Director for Current Intelligence Assistant Director for Research and Reports Assistant Director for Scientific Intelligence Director, National Photographic Interpretation Center GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification Approved For Release 2002/0, ,;1 T32415A000500190011-4 25X1A CVIT~: SrA\ (BI A2 d 4 A A AAAGAAA AAAA A 3 MILITARY THOUGHT (TOP SECRET): "The Role of pace Weapons in a Future. War" by Lieutenant-General N. Korenevskiy APPRAISAL OF CONTENT Documentary Following is a verbatim translation of an article entitled "The Role of Space Weapons in a Future War", by Lieutenant-General N. Korenevskiy. This article appeared in the 1962 First Issue of a special version of the Soviet military journal Voyennaya Mysl (Military Thought). This journal is published irregularly and is classified TOP SECRET by the Soviets. The 1962 First Issue went to press on 29 December 1961. Headquarters CoTment: Military Thought is published by the USSR Ministry of Defense in three versions, classified RESTRICTED, SECRET and TOP SECRET. The RESTRICTED version has been issued monthly since 1937, while the other two versions are issued irregularly. The TOP SECRET version was initiated in early 1960. By the end of 1961, 61 issues of the SECRET version had been published, 6 of them during 1961. APProved f=or Release 2002)T1 fJEg111 U09415AOOO5On- - - - - - 25X1 C 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and _3 declassification omn.o,.?a For Release 1200" 5ECM13-09415A0005001900 11-3 The Role of Space Weapons in a Future War (According to foreign views) by Lieutenant-General N. Korenevskiy The space weapons which are coming into existence at the present time attract the intense attention of the government and military figures of the main capitalist countries. 25X1A The first leap into space, accomplished by our country on 4 October 1957, naturally presented the question of the paths 'to the mastery of space, the means necessary for this, and the primary goals to be pursued in this. On the one hand, as was stressed in the speech of the President of the USA on 25 May 1961, thus began the "battle for men's minds" in which the United States strives for "great enterprises" capable of demonstrating to the entire world the capabilities of the country and its science and technology. In his speech Kennedy gave American science and technology the task of "achieving the flight of a man to the moon and his safe return to earth by the end of this decade." In his opinion,"not a single space venture of this period will be more exciting, im- pressive or important for the overall exploration of space nor so difficult or expensive." In order to achieve this goal he has already requested an additional appropriation of 531 million dollars for the 1961-62 fiscal year, having warned that in future years even more resources will be required. The total cost of the program of conquering the moon is estimated by the Americans to be about 40 billion dollars. On the other hand, the beginning of the conquest of space gave an impetus to its study for purely military 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification Approved For Release 200 f&_"T3-02415A000500190011-3 purposes, in which the space nearest to the earth is viewed simply as the arena of future battles. This article represents a first attempt to state, in a systematic manner, the views of the American command on the role of space weapons and the possibilities for employ- ing them in combat. The article does not pretend to be a complete elucidation of all questions connected with this subject. However, the information cited by us below attests to the need for serious study of the space weapons of the USA, the plans and intentions of the American command, and the possibilities of utilizing space devices for military purposes, The need for such a study is explained by the fact that, fors.oi a time now,:work in this field has gone beyond the limits of purely scientific investigation; it, has a..very definite military nature and is being given very serious attention by the highest American echelons, including even the President of the USA, The ballistic missile proved to be the first means of attack through space and, even though, in itself, it does not relate to space weapons, its appearance caused the need to develop a series of purely space weapons systems. Special reconnaissance earth satellites have been recognized as the best means for detecting launching sites and launch- ings of missiles. The exact tie-in of the geodetic net- works of the various countries and continents, which is necessary for determining the coordinates of such targets, proved to be feasible with the aid of special satellites that can be observed simultaneously by optical and radio- technical means from points which are within the networks being tied in. One of the basic tasks of so-called scien- tific satellites is to define more precisely. variations in the gravitation of the earth, i.e... to produce: the data IM - SECRET GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification 25X1A 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP33-02415A000500190011-3 Approved For Release.2002/ & RF i -02415A000500.190011-3 necessary in preparing to fire intercontinental ballistic missiles, Artificial earth satellites--meteorological, radio reconnaissance,M.and .communication--have been recog- nized as means capable of providing meteorological recon- naissance, radio reconnaissance and communications on a global scale. Numerous.projects for space systems for delivering strikes against ground targets, and for antimissile and antispace defense, appeared soon after the space support systems. The special significance of space weapons is also explained by the extreme difficulty of destroying space vehicles. 25X1A In confirming the adherence of the new administration of the 'USA to,an.aggressive policy, President Kennedy, in his special message of 28 March 1961,stated that the Ameri- can government must have at its disposal strategic attack and defense weapons adequate to forestall any premeditated attack on the United States. In this connection, special attention is given to weapons launched from concealed, mobile, or invulnerable bases that will not be wiped from the face of the earth as a result of a surprise attack. Space weapons belong to this very category of weapons. Until the recent past a special role in military strategy was allocated to the Air Force. However, in 1959 the American command had already included aerospace in the operating zone of its Air Force and announced the creation of the so-called aerospace forces. The aerospace forces are considered to be the fundamental U.S. strategic means, and include aerodynamic ...,craft (airplanes and cruise missiles), ballistic missiles and military space devices. The basic principles of employing aerospace forces to achieve the goals of the American government are stated in the so- called Basic Aerospace Doctrine of the U.S. Air Force.* *United States it Force asic Doctrine (Aerospace Doctrine). U.S. Air Force Manual AFM 1-2, 1 December 1959. Translation from the English, GRU Main Staff, Moscow, 1960. 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic CCr RU downgrading and - declas.1fication Approved For Release 2002/ : ~I~~RDIQ,~[3-02415A00050019001 1-3 _ 25X1A Approved For Release 20Q2iMQd :~3-02415A000500190011-3 The aerospace forces are intended for operations in the total expanse beyond the surface of the earth without any limits in altitude. This expanse is considered to be, from the military standpoint, indivisiblerand is called aerospace. According to the plans of the U.S. Air Force, made for a 15-year period (until 1975), the zone of combat operations in space will extend to altitudes of about 130,000 kilometers. Aerospace forces are capable of operating anywhere and at any t'im, They have an unlimited range of operation, high mobility, great speed and firepower, and are capable: of over- coming enemy defenses and conducting combat operations both in the atmosphere of any part of the globe or beyond the limits of the atmosphere. Aerospace forces can conduct combat operations inde- pendently or in cooperation with other types of armed forces. The most important principles in the employment of the aerospace forces are considered to be the principles of in- divisibility and'centralized control of forces clarity and d efin'i't u de., of the task assigned to them, maximum display of initiative in all operations, concentration of efforts, insuring security, and close cooperation with other types of armed forces and with civilian and government components. The significance of the principle of surprise, which is acknowledged to be the determinant, is especially stressed, and every effort is to be made to attain it. In a future general war, aerospace forces are given the decisive role. Theref ore attaining superiority in aerospace is made one of the most important tasks. TIt is maintained that "In general war the ultimate outcome would be a result of the decision in the aerospace battle at the outset"* *Uni.ted ta,tes Airorce Aerospace Doctrine,,p.21. phis page number apparently refers to the Soviet translation of the manual. The quotation is taken from page 13, para- graph 2 of AFM 1-2.7 '' SECRET GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declossification 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP33-02415A000500190011-3 25X1A and supremacy in aerospace is already manifested in a capability "to destroy the military might of the enemy and concurrently protect the security of the United States of America and its allies."* The aerospace forces are capable of acting against the elements comprising the enemy's might, and, by having supremacy in the aerospace, they obtain advantages for all other types of armed forces in their performance of the tasks before them. Bearing in mind these basic tenets of the American aerospace doctrine, let us now examine the question of supremacy in space and the role assigned to space weapons in a future war. The significance that is attached to attaining supremacy in space was best expressed by the present President in 1960 when he was still a U.S. senator: "Supremacy in space will be the substance of the next decade. The nation that controls space will also control the world," Kennedy said then.** This assertion is consistent with the thesis of the aero- space doctrine, in accordance with which the ultimate out- come of a future war will be decided by combat operations in the aerospace. The concept of supremacy in space differs from the earlier concepts of supremacy on land, on sea, and in the air. In, the, apai:nian: of..the. Ame:ticans the policy of supremacy is portrayed most vividly during combat operations on land. During combat operations on the sea, and especially in the air, this concept already has a limited application. Even greater limitations arise in its application to space. If the atmosphere ends at the maximum flight altitude of aero- dynamic aircraft, then space is limitless and open for all countries. Even in that part of the aerospace closest to the earth, the possibilities for supremacy are considerably I i p 19 . , a (T of AFM 1-27 **"Missiles and Rockets" October 24, 1960. ApprnviPd For RPIPanp 9(1(19 R1C~RR -4_n7d150(1M5(1(119001 r-r 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and 21 declassification less than on land, on the sea or in the air. However, supremacy in any environment remains as an ideal in the strategic concept by which one must be guided. Time and place become the basic factors under these condi- tions. In the opinion of General Power, the former Com- mander of the Strategic Air Command, "the existing concept of conducting combat operations in three dimensions of space will expand in time, if it can be expressed in this way, into the concept of conducting combat operations in four dimensions of space, combat operations in which the operational correlation between space and time will become the decisive factor." In general, if it is impossible to control the entire aerospace in order to deprive the enemy of the capability to use it for his purposes, it is then necessary to resolve the simpler problem of controlling a certain part of it at a certain time. One of these most important parts is the aerospace directly surrounding the earth and extending to an altitude approximately equal to one radius of the earth. In the opinion of the U.S. military command, the significance of space combat operations, in a future war, will be deter- mined by their influence on the combat capabilities of the enemy's ground forces and the operations of their own forces. From this point of view it seems realistic to deprive the enemy of the capability to use the indicated part of the aerospace nearest to the earth. The special interest expressed in the USA in questions of military uses of the aerospace is explained, to a signifi- cant degree, by the weakness of the U.S. position in the conventional spheres of armed forces operations. By casting their eyes into space, the realistic U.S. military theorists proceed from the position that the USA has been unable to achieve supremacy on land, on the sea and in the air. There- fore, space is considered to be the only expanse in which the USA can still count on obtaining definite military advantages. 05001904 GROUP 1 -25X1 A Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification Approved For Release 200 ' J E E 3 02415A000500190011-3 . G7- Proceeding from the position that the goal of strategy in peacetime is basically limited to making aselection of the best types of weapons, which cannot be acquired in a finished form and which have to be created gradually on a selective basis, t}ie military theorists and scientists of the USA are already studying questions of the possibil- ity of creating various new weapons to conduct war in space. In order to achieve supremacy in space, a whole series of space weapons systems is necessary, permitting the con- duct.of offensive and defensive operations. As the origin of the military use of space was established by the ballis- tic missile ,,which brought about the need to create a series of supporting systems of satellites, 'so. for supremacy in space a bombing system is first required, to consist of a great number of nuclear- uc ear bombs circling the earth in various orbits. The idea of creating such a system had already been advanced in the USA in 1948. However, at that time the necessary technical means to realize it did not exist. At the present time these means do exist. They are the "Atlas" missiles with which the U.S. Air Force is armed and to which "Titan" missiles soon will be added,and,later (in 1964), powerful "Saturn"-type carrier missiles. A second important question, which naturally arises in an attempt to create such a system, is the question of accuracy. Until the recent past, the expected low accuracy of such a system together with the high cost of putting satellites into orbit, was considered to be the basic ob- stacle to the creation of effective carrier-satellites (sputnik-nositel) of nuclearrmissile weapons, but at the present time the problem of accuracy is already being resolved successfully. The most important phase in this line is the "Discoverer" program. One of the goals in the "Discoverer" program is working out a system for the return from orbit of containers with various payloads. As of 1 December 1961, 10 containers had been recovered. These results are considered to be quite SECRET GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification 25X1A 25X1A Approved For Release 2002/06/24: CIA-RDP33-02415A000500190011-3 4W-?MF3109415A0005004 9001:1-3 Approved For Releaze4OO= 25X1A hopeful., and in the future the destruction of even compara- tively small targets from space is considered possible. At the present time certain requirements for a space bombing system have been formulated. The carrier satellites of this system must circle the earth in various orbits and must be supplemented by numerous decoy satellites (sputnik- lovushka). The creation of such decoys or dummy targets for misleading the enemy does not present any great diffi- culty. In order to hamper the radar or optical observation from the earth of each satellite of the system, it is intend- ed to use antiradar covering and to paint them black. Increasing the accuracy of nuclear strikes from space is planned by means of equipping the satellites, or the missiles launched from them, with homing guidance systems in addition to the programmed system which must constantly be corrected from the earth. An infrared homing system is proposed as such a system. The satellites of the space bombing system must, in advance, be put into orbits that pass over the territory of the Soviet Union. In the opinion of the U.S. military theorists, such actions cannot be considered to be an aggressive act so long as there is no international agree- ment defining the boundaries of the sovereignty of states beyond the limits of the atmosphereand so long as there is no legal status for space bodies. The creation of such a system, consisting of hundreds and thousands of satellites, ready to attack previously, selected targets at any moment, and whose destruction presents great difficulties, is a kind of apotheosis of the strategy of intimidation. On the other hand, authors of the plans for creating space bombing systems examine them from the standpoint of the possibility of transferring combat operations into space without conducting them on the earth, on the sea, or in the air. Thus, we are speaking of a new version of the theory of limited wars. It is contemplated that the results of military 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and Approued Eor Release 900M. Auag-09415A00050019001 -3 declauification orRelease S'EgUj33 92416A OOO5O91(1AAA A 7 -OA AK_ operations in space will have a great military-political and economic significance for the countries participating in them and will be able to force the Soviet Union to make con- cessions. The political significance of success in such a war will be determined by the fact that the country that achieves it will demonstrate its superiority in materiel- technical means, in its technological base, and in its theory, which will simplify the "conquest of the minds" of men, the recruiting of allies and the resolving of arguments with the enemy to one's advantage in various international organizations. The fact that the system exists will supposedly force the enemy to take defensive measures which will entail huge expenditures. It will be necessary to detectjrecog- nize, and destroy or render harmless, ailsuch satellites one by one, including the decoy satellites. Combat with carrier-satellites presents a very complex problem. It is considered that the direct destruction of satellites is unacceptable because it can lead to radio- active contamination of the expanse between the atmosphere and the lower Van Allen belt. Moreover, the remains of the satellite and antisatellite satellite will create a great number of dummy targets. Therefore, the enemy will be forced to install braking rockets onthe satellites in order to have these satellites lose altitude and burn in the upper layers of the atmosphere. In order to hinder this work, booby-traps or other automatically operating defen- sive devices can be installed on the satellites in advance. Further, it is contemplated that the enemy,i.e., the Soviet Union, will not limit itself to defense, and will debit its own carrier-satellites. In turn, the USA will conduct- a system of measures to' co~rnbat them. . As' 'a result, the"Soviet Union will be" drawn into' combat operations that "will. be conducted .with a great strain on its forces, an may prove to be beyond the strength of its economy. Approved rma- r Re- le- 2-&-a- 2002~x" 25X1A 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification being conducted by the USA at the present time under the NABS (Nuclear Armed Bombardment System) program. This pro- gram includes a series of special projects. One of them envisages the development of carrier-satellites of "space- to-surface class missiles (project PCBS), orbiting ? at an altitude of about 200 km. The other projects (SLOB and SHAOB) envisage the creation of strategic satellite; bom- bers in "low" (altitudes up to 36,000 km) and "high" (altitudes over 36,000 km)orbits. The practical creation of a space bombing system is considered feasible in the near future. An important role in attaining supremacy in space is allocated to guided manned spaceships.. This. was especially stressed by the former Chief of Staff of the U:S Air Force, General Thomas White, who in 1960 stated: "In order to dominate aerospace it is necessary to have not only space- ships that can fly from one point of the globe to another but it is also necessary to have men operate effectively in space," The first steps in developing manned spaceships are the work on the experimental X-15 aircraft and the manned satellite of the "Mercury" project. In the near future flights of the X-15 aircraft are planned with the goal of attaining altitudes of 100 to 160 km, and in the beginning of 1962 the first flight of the American astronaut, Glenn, is expected, who is to orbit the earth three times. Subsequent phases in this direction should be orbital gliding bombers and reconnaissance aircraft being developed in the "Dyna-Soar" project, and also, in the initial stage, by several leading American companies ("Lockheed",'Hughes" and others). The creation of manned space stations and command posts is planned for the future. The moon is considered to be an important element of the U.S. "deterrent force" in aerospace. Its role from this point of view had already been stressed in January 1958 GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic '25X1A downgrading and declassificat' nAox rS,Ec A2 AA GA AA --- 83 024 AGAA19AAAA 7 V by Brigadier-General Homer Boushey (U.S. Air Force). He said: "The moon possesses one advantage that has long been recognized. by military science, namely, the advantage of altitude." 25X1A The possession of military bases on the moon will 'supposedly preclude the possibility of destroying the U.S. military might in case of surprise attack. The duration of a missile flight from the earth to the moon is about two calendar days. Therefore the simultaneous neutrali- zation of a moon base and of targets on earth is impossible. During a strike against targets on the earth a potential for delivering a fc ouhterstrike from lunar bases is retain- ed. On the other hand,a strike against lunar bases dis- closes the intentions of the enemy and provides time for preparing and effecting countermeasures,.. The military significance of the moon is determined by the potentialities that unfold with the employment of lunar bases. Such bases can insure: --observation of enemy territory with the aid of telescopes; --detection of enemy ballistic missile launchings; --radio counter- measures against systems for controlling space weapons and space communication systems; --launching of missiles against ground targets from launching pads concealed on the :h i d. d e n side of the moon. Already, interest in the moon is not limited to a study of questions and a discussion of discovered poten- tialUties.. Specific projects are being worked out which propose the construction of various structures under the surface of the moon from the freight compartments of missiles, and also the employment of various versions of pneumatic structures. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and also various American companies ("Martin", "Aerospace", etc.) , are conducting a great deal of work in this direction. Parallel with working out the question of the military use of space for offensive purposes, considerable attention in the USA is being given to defensive space systems intend- ed for antimissile and antisatellite, or,more exactly, Annrnvpd For Pplpacp 7f0f) ? idlE(F211g.T_(17d15A0005001Ann1 GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and 25X1A APProved For Release 9f19 ? MMAL-09415AOOO5O019OO11-3 antispace, defense. The U.S. Department of Defense is already working on designs for a combat space system, SCWS-694E, which in- cludes several thousand destroyer satellites (sputnik- istrebitel) to destroy intercontinental ballistic missiles, and also for the "Saint" system which includes several thousand interceptor satellites for intercepting enemy space objectives. The creation of such antimissile and antispace defense means is already considered to be possible in 1966 or 1967. However, the generally accepted view- point in the USA is that in the near future space weapons systems will strengthen offensive, and not defensive, capa- bilities.. Therefore, various versions of defensive space systems are considered to be less significant than plans for offensive systems, A great deal of attention is also given to means of space reconnaissance., Such reconnaissance is completely feasible technically, not only for strategic but also for tactical purposes; it will greatly increase the capabil- ities of the ground, naval and air forces. 25X1A In accordance with the basic doctrine of the U.S. Air Forces aerospace forces must constantly be used to procure intelligence. It is recognized that in order to get intelligence information "a nation must be prepared to accept great risks when the risks of not having the infor- mation are considered greater."* In the USA the various stages in the military mastery of aerospace are considered to be the following: --the first stage (1962 to 1965) - creation of military support satellite systems; --the second stage (1965 to 1970) - creation of carrier-satellites and means of antispace defense, flight to the moon and return to the earth, the creation of powerful carrier-missiles and manned space ships; *United States Air Force erospace. Ddctrine,.p. 9 /. 5 of .AFM 1,-27. 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification Annrnv d For RPlaasa 9(1(1 ~~-qI`1?33_(19d150(1(1(i5O(119(1(111 _3 --the third stage (after 1970) - the creation of autonomous space systems, manned space stations and command posts, and military bases on the moon. 25X1A In the first stage space weapons still have an auxiliary significance and are intended for supporting the combat operations of all the types of armed forces of the USA. Control of them is effected from the earth. By the end of this stage systems of'~aktifioial earth satellites must be created for reconnaissance of ground targets, for detecting the launchings of ballistic missiles, for the precise connection of geodetic networks and geodetic tie-in of tar- gets, for exact navigation of missile-carrying submarines and strategic bombers carrying "air-to-surface" class missiles, for global radio communications, for forecasting the weather, and also for radio-electronic intelligence and radio coun- termeasures. In this way a total of 7 satellite systems must be created, which, in the opinion of the American command, can be employed for the support of 13 basic opera- tions of an offensive and defensive nature, conducted by all the types of U.S. armed forces. The types of combat operations and the support systems of satellites that are planned to be used in them are repre- sented in table 1. The capabilities of employing a system of satellites can be examined ,wi'th' strategic air operations as an example. Reconnaissance satellites are to disclose the targets for such operations. Ultra-long-range missile detection satel- lites, in essence, determine the necessary degree of combat readiness of aviation for participation in the first opera- tion of a future war, and in the future, together with other means, they will provide the warning to get aircraft air- borne in a timely manner in order to prevent their---..., destruction by missiles on the airfields where they are based. On the other hand they will determine, at least approximately, the area of a missile launching, and, to- gether with other reconnaissance means, will aid in locating the sites of missile bases so that they can subsequently be destroyed by aircraft and missile strikes. Geodetic 25X1A I GROUP I Excluded from automatic downgrading and declassification . 5.E R 924AGA999E99A999AA 7 25X1A satellites will permit the defining of target coordinates for delivering strikes against them from the air; naviga- tional satellites will permit the delivery of more accurate strikes against these targets with delivery aircraft carrying I'Sky. Boit" and "Hound Dog" type missiles. Commun- ication ,sate..lites will support coir1munica.t.ions, meteorological satellites will insure the receipt of the necessary meteoro- logical data for planning operations, and radio-electronic intelligence satellites will provide data on the radiotechnical means of the enemy that must be neutralized or destroyed either in advance of, or during the operation itself. From the table it is apparent that reconnaissance, ultra-long-range missile detection, communications and meteorological systems will find application in all the indicated operations, which explains. the special attention now being devoted to space reconnaissance and communications systems. The remaining systems :will also receive ;quite.. widescale employment. 25X1A GROUP 1 Excluded from automatic downgrading and Approved Fei- Release -02416A00060019-99-1-1 , declassification Approved For Release 200 :C ;PLIM3-02415A000500190011-3 Em to rry ,ent of Suporti.n , Satellite Systems in the Combat Operations of the Armed Forces of the USA ?of t 1upportirw rn]ect Forces Satellite System Type of offensive and .. v defensive combat operatic,~.. O ej f4 0 i N cd O?i N 4 >. 0., 0 0 19? t~ cd a 4C ) -04 py 0O 1 p bo O O O U 1 U r-I s, sd , 08 cd 9 O ri r l J G) rq ) O "1 rl ay 14 () C~ 14 . N D + +- by > -P4 ai da O 1 0 cd odd a 9 o +~ -4 $4 P4 -0 ' 1 2 4 5 u ?~ ~, y 10 1.1 Operations of on - -Q ?y cor?pas of strategic di;iiu'c ic>z] X x - X x X Operations of field armies / - - x x - x x '7r Landing opcr:;l~$.:i.o]]::3 - x x x x x X Missile-C:3rry. i .a.unl,~ix,"iu?,., operations (with "Polaris" x x x x x x nissiles } Operations of carrier strike . ? - x x x x x x Anti submiarinC t -.; ?ations - { - X X _ X X X X Mirie-1ayirltj bind operations ' X x PVO operati.or."u ,~ x x Z