CONGRESSIONAL RECORD- HOUSE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
K
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 13, 2013
Sequence Number: 
112
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 21, 1983
Content Type: 
OPEN SOURCE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5.pdf552.04 KB
Body: 
? - n . A _ n ... " r . % ..// Declassified and Approved For Re lease 2013/09/13 : CIA-RDP11M01338R00040047011275 H238. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD'? HOUSE tide of insss; insanity' and, mass murder; too few men willing to be different:, In Nazi Germany, there 'were not enough uncommon. men to stop: the Holocaust; and in. the Soviet Union tinder Stalin; there were 'too few un- common men to stop the programs and purges. "We will never understand totalitar- ianism if we do not understand that people rarely' have the strength to be uncommon," said Ionesco: ? It would also be correct to saY that we will never understand genocide if we do not understand that, people rarely have the strength to be differ- ent when confronted with masa same- ness. ? If we were to, Study the causes of genocide, I think we would find that before the actual act of slaughter, great and continous pressures were being brought-to bear on. the people to conform, to toe the official line,: to support the. final solution, to solve the Armenian question. All individuals are pressured in some ? way to conform, to some act or, deed or thought- Surely 'each of us who are Members.. of -Congress feel the great and 'continuous pressure. to support party policy; or administration policy, orthe. demands, of constituents,. Surely each of us understands,. the strength it takes to be. uncommon- ? ? It should be clear then to Members of' this body that, we must-make a spe- cial ? effort to be tolerant.. of difference. We must not be iunitive toward those who act in an =Common manner.. Had ?the Ottoman Dirks been toler- ant, of difference, there would not have been. an Armenian genocide_ Had the Nazis been tolerant of others? there would not have been a Hole- The great strength of this country has come from 'its individuals and the Nation's desire to protect and respect the feelings and opinions_ of the Ina. vidnal, the ultimate minority. In such an environment,. mass slaughter is unthinkable: It only be- comes possible in an environment of forced commonality and coerced con', f enmity. ? If we de nothing e/se today; let us strive ? for greater tolerance of differ- ence; let us' try harder 'to ? understand those who are uncommon; let its be perceptive enough to recognize the dangers inherent in a large group, of people. who march to the same' drum- mer, let its be wise enough te smile at the solitary marcher:sr. FIFTH ANNUAL OLIN E. TEAGUE AWARD PRESENTED TO? VA NURSE The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen-, tleman from Mississippi (Mr. MONT- GOMERY) is recognized for 5 minutes. e Mr. MONTGOMERY. Mr. Speaker, a Veterans' Administration clinical specialist in rehabilitation nursing, Ms. Mary Ann Mikulic, R.N., of Seat- ? tle, has one the Olin. E. Teague Award for her' work in the rehabilitation of war-injured veterans- The' ?amitial award goes: to a VA em- ployee or group of employees working as a. team,,, whose achievements have been of special benefit to veterans with service-connected injuries; It was named in honor of the late LT.& Con- .gressman from Texas who served as chairman of' the Committee' on Veter- ans" Affairs for 20' years.. Ms; Miltullo 'was selected for this year's award from nominations_stib- mitted by VA facilities around the country. She has served at the VA Medical Center. in Seattle; Wash., since 19:75;? when she assumed the posi- tion of clinical specialist' in rehabilita- tion nursing.. . During.. this period; Ms. ?Miktlic has conducted studies; on patient treat- 'meat issues' that impede OT promote rehabilitatiom and her work has been extensively published in professional ' journals.- She has also taught and par- .ticipated in development of the facul- ty for nine' VA regional medical educa- tion center programs; in rehabilitation- related issues: ? " She has been ,widely recognized in the non,--VA professional comratinity as well. A recipient of the ,Army . Com- mendation Medal in 1981, Ms. Mikulie has also received the National Associ-' ation. of Rehabilitation Nurses Certifi- cate of Appreciation for outstanding service.. Ms: Miktilid: joined VA in 1952 as a staff nurse at the agency' S 'Vanceuver, Wash.? hospital. She has taught at the University of Washington School of Medicine since 1975; and: is a colonel in _the ArrOY. Nurse Colts, U.S. Army Re- serves; She received her nursing degree from the -University of Port- land in 1946 and her masters and pest- - masters from the University of Wash- ington. ? ? Mn Speaker, the presentation of this award speaks; eloquently for its worthy recipient; for the overall excel- Ience of' VA's- Department of Medicine arid Surgery; and most especially, for the achieve/tents of the man in whose name this; award is offered-Indeed, I cannot imagine a more fitting tribute to the man who. ? accomplished more for veterans, particularly the disabled veteran, than any. single American in our Nation's; history: Olin Teague'S legacy of determination and forth- rightness can only inspire those of Us who fallow him. ? The award will be presented to Ma. Mikiffle by VA Administrator Harry N. Waiters in a specie ceremony this afternoon. I am 'delighted ,that Mrs. Olin Teague and her son, James M. Teague; will: be attending the cere- mony. . ' TI 501 ; HMEAR?. - EXTENSIONR7OP. ITS PROPA- GANDA EFFORTS, The SPEAKER pro tempere. Under a? previous order of the House, the gen- April 21,1983 tleman from. Florida : (Mr. Youna) is recognized for 10; minutes. . gr-MEa.,?Y.OLING'ofrFliirida.. Mr: Speak- er; - member of the Permanent Select; Committee' on Intelligence, I have; devoted a, great -deal of time to the investigation, of Soviet active measures; operations- in the United States and throughout the world. Through these activities, the Soviets are attempting to undermine the credibility of' our Nation. Our committee and the. American- in- telligence community received tremen- dous Insight into Soviet active meas- ures operations last- July when Starlit- inv. Levchenko, a former high-ranking KGB offfter and active measures sp-e- -cialist in Japan who defected to ? the United States in .1979; testified before our -committee: He was the 'first Soviet active' measures officer ? to; make him- self available to our intelligence orga-., nizations: During his- testimony, Mt. Lev- cherika provided detailed' accounts of Soviet active measures operations he ? was directly involved with in Japan. His testimony provided valuable evi- dence and insight into these-Soviet. -ac- tivities, and, even: though --he was not directly involved with the active meas- ures campaign in our country,. we learned from the CIA and iota. that Soviet influence' operations such as his In Japan are'similar to th.ose employed by the Soviet Union in the United States and throughout the world.. From, testimony of the CIA and de- tailed guest-inning: of Mr: - Levchenko, our committee determined without a doubt that Mr:. ?Levchenko's informa- tion, was accurate and that he was pre- senting- it in the best interest of the United States. The CIA researched and investigated' Mr. ? Levchenko and his: statements' and assured the com- mittee that they were accurate and' of great value in providing new informa- tion and validating established tech- niques for spotting Soviet active meas- ures operations. -According to the testimony of the. CIA: The information that he gave us we have ? been, able to check out through various other means, and we are satisfied not only that he told the truth, but also ,that the extent of the information that he gave us was so damaging to the Soviet cause that ft would be inconceivable that he . might be under Soviet KGB contr.ol.. As a -result of Mr: Levehenko's testi- mony, which the CIA labeled as,deva;s- tat-Mg to the Soviet Union, the Soviet Government, following a secret trial, sentenced him to death in absentia? ? the most severe' penalty the ? Soviet Government' Cari pass down to one of its citizens. This in itself "demonstrates the impact his, testimony has had on the Soviet, - Still,. the Soviet:Union, in a last gasp attempt- to discredit Mr: Levchenko, has turned its active measures appara- tus against hith. Using a standard active measures technique known as disinformation, the official Soviet - Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/13: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5 , ( Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/13: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5 April 21, 1983 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? HOUSE Government newspaper Isvestiya car- ried in February a lengthy smear attack on Mr. Levchenko. The attack included false quotations attributed to him which called into question his mo- tivation for defecting and his mental and physical state, it claimed he was acting as a puppet of the U.S. Govern- ment, and implied that the members of the committee held a negative atti- tude toward him. None of Lsvestiya's statements could be further from the truth. The mem- bers of the committee were greatly im- pressed by Mr. Levchenko's knowledge and understanding of the complex Soviet active measures operation and were moved by his willingness to risk his life to assist our Government. As he said in his testimony: ? I have provided the Central Intelligence Agency with the information I had. I hope this information will help the cause of de- fending the free world against the menace of Soviet expansionism and aggression. These are not the words of an American puppet, they are the words of a former higher echelon Soviet citi- zen who became so disenchanted and resentful of the Soviet system, that he fled to the ;United States to gain his long deprived freedom. In testimony to our committee, Mr. Levchenko detailed the expansive Soviet active measures operation in Japan, which included the use of con- tacts in the Japanese media and the Japanese Government. Needless to say, his testimony shook Japan. The Japanese press has been investigating Mr. Levchenko's testimony since I first made it public last December, and de- spite the lies the Soviets are attempt- ing to spread about Levchenko, even the official newspaper of the Japanese Communist Party, Akahata, has ac- knowledged the accuracy of his testi- mony. Aka.hata has accurately report- ed his testimony to the Japanese people and has added details of its own which confirm Mr. Levchenko's information. The Japanese Govern- ment, in addition, has publicly ex- pressed its faith in his testimony. As the Japanese have learned, it is imperative that people throughout the world be aware of increasing Soviet ef- forts to tip the balance of peace. While the threat posed by Soviet weaponry has received great attention, the growing list of successful Soviet propaganda campaigns continues to be ignored. ' By presenting information on Soviet active measures such as its smear cam- paign against Mr. Levchenko, the American people will have a better un- derstanding of Soviet operations aimed at discrediting the United States. It is only through an informed American public that We will be able to successfully challenge this Soviet threat to our Nation's freedom and se- curity.? The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Texas (Mr. GONZALEZ) is recognized for 30 minutes. [Mr. GONZALEZ addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereaf- ter in the Extensions of Remarks.] The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Illinois (Mr. ANNUNZIO) is recognized for 5 minutes. [Mr. ANNUNZIO addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereaf- ter in the Extensions of Remarks.] MORTGAGE RELIEF FOR VETERANS The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Alabama (Mr. SHELBY) is recognized for 5 minutes. ? Mr. SHELBY. Mr. Speaker, today my Subcommittee on Housing and Me- morial Affairs began hearings on the VA housing program. One of the bills being considered is H.R. 2618 which I introduced on Tuesday. This bill would provide- financial relief to unemployed veteran home- owners facing foreclosure. If a veteran, through no fault of his own, is at least 6 months delinquent in his mortgage payments, the VA would be authorized to set up an escrow account in his behalf to make him current and pro- vide up to 6 months of additional relief. This assistance could be ex- tended, if necessary, but in no event could the total monetary advance exceed $8,400. This measure is specifically geared to those needy veterans who are suf- fering from the effects of unemploy- ment, underemployment or serious ill- ness. Recent statistics indicate that 800,000 Vietnam and disabled veterans are unemployed. Mr. Speaker, I feel this is important legislation for us to consider_ The economy appears to be on the upswing but there are many veterans who con- tinue to be unemployed. The chances are good, however, that they will be able to get back on their feet shortly. Meanwhile, foreclosures are at an alltime high. We must do something to help our veterans during this inter- im period of economic adversity. As you know, the House Banking, Fi- nance and Urban Affairs Committee has reported legislation which would establish a new revolving fund to assist homeowners facing foreclosure on home mortgage loans not insured by the Federal Housing Administra- tion or the Farmers Home Administra- tion. Although this measure would help some veterans, we believe our bill provides an alternative remedy. It should be noted that our bill re- quires no new money from taxpayers to provide this assistance. This pro- gram would be funded out of existing revolving funds currently used to pay claims. It is possible that this bill could even prove cost effective by sub- stituting this mortgate payment ad- vance for the high expenses currently incurred by the Veterans' Administra- H 2309 tion in paying claims of lenders, insti- tuting foreclosure procedures and re- selling acquired properties. I am pleased to say that my bill is cosponsored by the chairman of the full committee, the gentleman from Mississippi, Mr. SONNY MONTGOMERY; the ranking minbrity member of the subcommittee, Mr. CHRISTOPHER SMITH Of New Jersey; Mr. BOB EDGAR of. Pennsylvania, the distinguished chairman of our Subcommittee on Hospitals and Health Care and a gen- tleman who is known for championing the cause of all veterans; Mr. LANE EVANS of Illinois, a Vietnam veteran and outstanding member; and Mr. BILL RICHARDSON of New Mexico, a dis- tinguished member of the subcommit- tee who is vitally interested in assist- ing veterans in need, especially those who served in Vietnam. Mr. Speaker, it is my intention to mark up this vital piece of legislation in the near future.* NELSON AND WINNIE MANDELA: HONORARY U.S. CITIZENS The SPEAKER pro temliore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Michigan (Mr. CROCKETT) is recognized for 5 minutes. ? Mr. CROCKETT. Mr. Speaker, Nelson Mandela, black nationalist and leader of the antiapartheid movement in South Africa, has said: "To over- throw oppression has been sanctioned by humanity and it is the highest aspi- ration of every free man." As we in the 98tli Congress continue to discuss the issues before us, the author of those words, Nelson Man- dela, is serving the 21st year of his life sentence for advocating the abolition of racial apartheid in South Africa. His wife, Winnie Mandela, is beginning the 21st year of her banning in South Africa for her own part in founding the now-banned Black Parents Associ- ation in South Africa. Mr. Speaker, those Members who have taken the initiative to learn about South Africa know of the con- tinuing oppression of blacks by the South African GovernMent, and the continuing repression of dissent in any form by that racist government. While he has been cut off from vir- tually all outside contact during his _ imprisonment, Nelson Mandela re- mains, nonetheless, a focal point of op- position in South Africa. Today, he is ? recognized as the leader of the strug- gle for the liberation of South Africa by virtually every independent black political figure inside South Africa, as well as by a growing number of whites. Winnie Mandela, whose banishment from her family and friends to the small town of Brandfort, South Africa, has brought her great hardship, has been "free" only 11 months since 1962. In recognition of Nelson and Winnie Mandela's contributions to the strug- gle for civil and human rights in the world, I have introduced legislation to Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/13: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5 Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/13: CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5 112310 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ? HOUSE make them honorary citizens of the United States, and to urge our Gov- ernment and the Government of South Africa to free the Mandelas from their imprisonment as political prisoners. I invite those Members who have not yet indicated their interest in cosponsoring these resolutions to con- tact my office. Mr. Speaker, the apartheid system in South Africa is the last bastion of colonialism and systematized racism, where the entire government and social structure is built on 'violence, economic exploitation and deprivation of basic human rights and civil rights. The Government of the United States, the Security Council and General As- sembly of the United Nations, and vir- tually every country in the world con- demns the Government of South Africa for its practice of apartheid. Nelson and Winnie Mandela are in the vanguard of the struggle to over- turn the apartheid system in South Africa. In 1944 Nelson Mandela joined the African National Congress, which is committed to eradicating the South African Government's official policy of racial apartheid and in its place erecting a society in which the rights of all South African citizens are the same, regardless -of race, color or sex. He became one of the more effective and charismatic leaders of South Afri- ca's 20 million blacks', and was instru- mental in raising the membership of the African National Congress from '7,000 to 100,000. On August 5, 1962, the South Afri- can Government arrested Nelson Man- dela, and charged him with leaving the country without a valid passport and inciting the country's workers to strike. He Was acquitted of those. charges, but was again arrested and charged with sabotage. He was con- victed and sentenced on June 12, 1964, at the "Rivonia Trial," of life impris- onment without hope of parole. ? Fol- lowing his imprisonment, there was an international outcry at the actions of the South African Government, and the United Nations on several occa- sions demanded the release of Nelson Mandela and other political prisoners in South Africa. There have been ? countless requests for his release from individuals and organizations, both , within and outside South Africa. Now 64, Nelson Mandela has spent the last 20 years of his life in a maxi- mum security prison on Robben Island and at Pollsmoor, South Africa. Yet, despite the fact that he has been cut off from the liberation movement for 20 years, Nelson Mandela remains the leading symbol of resistance to oppres- sion in South Africa, and the most widely recognized leader of that coun- try's black population. Meanwhile, the South African Gov- ernment has intensified its legally sanctioned oppression of the majority black population through inhumane detentions, bannings, banishments, the revocation of citizenship and other means. It has continued its harass- ment of Nelson Mandela's wife Winnie, by a series of arrests, impri- sonments, and bannings that have spanned 19 of the last 20 years. She has repeatedly been held under South African "terrorism" statutes, allowing indefinite imprisonment without charge. She is now "banished" to Brandfort, approximately 250 miles from her home in Johannesburg. She is permitted to see only one person at a time and is restricted to her home at night and on weekends. The lives of Nelson and Winnie Man- dela are a testament to the inhuman brutality of the South African apart- heid system, and a symbol of hope to those who seek justice and human rights. I urge my colleagues to join me in extending to these two courageous people the title of honorary citizen of the United States, and in seeking their release from prison in South Africa.. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from New Jersey (Mr. Ronmo) is recognized for 5 minutes. (Mr. RODINO addressed the House. His remarks will appear hereafter in the Extensions of Remarks.] ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT CALLING FOR FURTHER STUDY OF MUTUAL GUARAN- TEED BUILD-DOWN The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gen- tleman from Georgia (Mr. LEvrrAs) is recognized for 5 minutes. ? Mr. LEVITAS. Mr. Speaker, yester- day, the House accepted an amend- ment I offered to House Joint Resolu- tion 13, which proposes that the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Commit- tee study reductions in nuclear weap- ons and complementary and concur- rent arms control proposals with par- ticular focus on proposals "aimed at progressive reductions in the number of destabilizing weapons through a mutual build-down or other verifiable processes." The concept of a mutual guaranteed build-down was thoroughly discussed during the debate on another amend- ment, which I offered, which would have incorporated this proposal into House Joint Resolution 13. Some Members expressed concern over con- sidering this proposal in the context of the freeze resolution; nonetheless, many recognized the merits of the build-down proposal and feel it de- serves further, serious consideration. The amendment accepted yesterday will assure further consideration of the mutual guaranteed build-down and the means it provides for moving toward reductions of destabilizing weapons. The build-down can move us toward a safer, more stable world, and it should be considered and imple- mented in the very new future. April 21, 1,988 An editorial in the New York Times of' April 19, 1983, took note of this imaginative initiative, and also the proposals put forward for deMIRV'ing and moving toward the ideas' ex- pressed in the Scowcroft Commission report for reducing multiple warhead missiles. I would like to put this article into the RECORD, and I am glad we have adopted my amendment calling for further study of these ideas. "Sxop NUKES"; THEN WHAT? The nuclear freeze resolution that comes up before the House of Representatives to- -Morrow is a primal scream against man- kind's atomic predicament. O.K., agreed: The- overhanging nuclear nightmare justi- fies screaming. But then what? To exclaim "Stop nukes now" displays passion, but no practicality. What's the next sentence? Where is the credible arms control policy that freeze advocates have failed so far to advance? To its credit, the movement has aroused widespread public support, undoubtedly tempering the belligerency of the Reagan Administration's statements and helping to induce the reasonable new proposal for the Euromissile negotiations in Geneva. The freeze movement has also stirred Congres- sional interest in arms control?probably in- fluencing the Scowcroft commission's far- sighted proposal to replace destabilizing multi-warhead missiles with small, single- warhead "Midgetman." Yet the proposals of the freeze movement itself have barely evolved past the original, 'simplistic formula of "stop, now." The House resolution still calls for an "im- mediate" freeze through negotiations with Moscow. Yet such negotiations would have to take several years. The resolution still calls for a "verifiable" halt in producing nu- clear arms. Nice, but infeasible. A freeze would ban weapons moderniza- tion?thus halting improvements in weap- ons that would stabilize the balance of terror. The resolution calls for but fails to give useful "special attention" to destabiliz- ing first-strike weapons. It would freeze America in a potentially vulnerable Minute- man land-missile deployment while doing nothing about the Soviet Union's potential first-strike force. The remedy, the ingenious Scowcroft proposal to create "Midgetman," would be barred. Is there some way to harness all this polit- ical energy to constructive arms control ends? There is talk of a conference commit- tee compromise between House and -Senate resolutions, but the best that could produce is a least-common-denominator compromise. What's needed is a new approach to the arms control dilemma along the lines sug- gested by the Scowcroft report. Two imaginative precursors of this pro- posal are already before Congress: the "build-down" proposal sponsored by Sena- tors Nunn and Cohen would require disman- tling of two older nuclear weapons for every new one deployed. Representative Gore's comprehensive plan would also move the su- perpowers toward the Scowcroft goal of re- ducing multiplewaxhead missiles. .Both would build on the SALT treaties, but em- phasize ceilings on warheads rather than launchers and missiles. A dozen or more pro-freeze senators have endorsed the build-down idea. Unfortunate- ly, instead of welcoming such innovations, many freeze enthusiasts attack them. And the House Democratic leadership continues to press for the freeze resolution: stop, now. Declassified and Approved For Release 2013/09/13 : CIA-RDP11M01338R000400470112-5