LETTER TO ADMIRAL STANSFIELD TURNER FROM ROBERT A. FROSON

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
July 10, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
June 15, 1979
Content Type: 
LETTER
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6.pdf487.09 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08 :CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT (Q/ACI) _ ,.,r .: _ . Routing Slip -~ W ~`. ; ; ACTION iNFO DATA INIT1Al 1 DCI 2 DDCI _ ." 3 DD/RM a- - ~"'"- 4 DD/NFA _ r .. DUICT` ~~ a~- ~ w~ 8 DD/S&7 ,_ 9 CC .~__ LL ~ 10 LC: 11 IG , 12 Compt - 13 D/PA 14 DEED 15 D/Pens - 16 AD/DCI '~~ 17 C/IPS 18 /~L' L' i./ 19 20 21 22 . SilSPENSE DATE: ~ ~-- STAT ~ ~~ -----. m. Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08 :CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 Admiral Stansfield Turner Director Central Intelligence Washington, DC 20505 Dear Admiral Turner: Presidential Directive/NSC-42 directed an interagency study of options for integrating remote sensing systems into an overall national system. Tre first phase of tY~at study is near completion, and a draft report addressing some of the technical and cost factors involved in different levels of remote sensing systems integration is now being reviewed by your representative. We expect to complete this interagency review in the next few weeks. I wish to stress that this draft does not represent the full report called for in PD/NSC-42 and Jim McIntyre's memorandum to me of February 1, 1979. We must now turn our attention to the policy, management, and institutional aspects of the nation's remote sensing programs, and take into consideration as well the interagency work done on public sector involvement possibilities, meteorological satellite system convergence, and oceanic satellite demonstration activities. Since our overall deadline for a complete report to the Policy Review Committee (Space) is mid-August, we will have to streamline our remaining study activities and make the most effective use of the time remaining. I have selected Dr. Anthony ~. Calio, NASA's Associate Administrator for Space and Terrestrial Applications, to head this effort. I envisage him working with a small, high-level group to examine the sensible significant policy directions the United States might take in remote sensing, the several basic management approaches that could be considered, and the various institutional structures that would be responsive to the defined national requirements.., To conserve scarce time and manpower, we propose to first outline a "straw man" document and then engage the group to assure that all pertinent points are adequately treated. I feel this approach will assure that there is no forced compromise of valid positions and that the resultant report will be a proper basis for the PRC(S) deliberations. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 ? II I would appreciate it if your office could let Dr. Calio / (755-8588) know who you would like to work with him on study. this fi/ cc: Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Director, Office of Management and Budget Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs and Policy Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08 :CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 . OFFICIAL ROUTING SLIP TO NAME AND AODRE~a DATE INITIALS 1 2 3 4 S 6 ACTION DIAECT REPLY PREPARE REPLY APPROVAL DISPATCN RECOMMENDATION COMMENT FILE RETURN CONCURRENCE INFORMATION S16NATURE Remarkaz ~~a~~ro''T ~i~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ .~ ~) ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~ FOLD HERE TO RETURN TO SENDER R[sS A 1MON[ NO. DATE COIKFIDENTIAL S CRET ns (40) 1 Declassified in Part -Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08 :CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 F E 8 1 1979 MEMORANDUM FOR: HONORABLE HAROLD BROWN SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HONORABLE ROBERT M. FROSCH ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION HONORABLE STANSFIELD TURNE~ DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE JAMES T. McINTYRE, JR. DIRECTOR ' SUBJECT: Shuttle Operational Management Responsibility Esacu'.iva :i:_y~siiy ~) -~ ?`?'~ As directed by PD/NSC-42, in the FY 1980 budget review OMB examined Shuttle operational management responsibility as currently planned by the agencies. The only near-term issue identified in this area was the extent to which the Department of Defense plans to make use of facilities at the Johnson Space Center for monitoring Shuttle launch and flight data. In this connection, we understand that DOD is currently studying the possibility of adding a dedicated DOD Shuttle Operations Planning Center to a backup Satellite Test Center. (C)_ Because of the potential cost savings from avoidance of redundant Shuttle control facilities, I am requesting that DOD, NASA, and the DCI cooperate with OMB in the conduct of the study to determine whether a joint mission control center or separate DOD and NASA facilities should be used to meet out-year Shuttle mission requirements. DOD should also address the need for a backup facility to the current Satellite Test Center. The study should be completed by August 1, 1979, with an interim report by April 1, 1979. (C) The request for this study has been coordinated with Dr. Press and Dr. Brzezinski. OMB's contact point in this effort is Mr. Daniel H. Taft, Deputy Associate Director (Special Studies), National Security and Inter- national Affairs. I request that you designate a lead person to work with OMB on this study ?w--?^?-?~-~~"'""'" . ~7 r~ ?r -:~,~ ~ , r ~~' `'~~~~~`~~U l ~~ ~ ~~~` ' v ~ ~ ^,,u~~U l Copies to: 15 The Secretary of State ~uls~.~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ mt.. .. n, ......-.a-.~.,. err, __ _r - - - ~ - _ _ Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs..,anc~,p,A7?j,~~Y NSIA/SSD ~~ , : ~~ ^ Deckzssify ~ Review far Ue- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 --- Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503 FE S 1 1979 MEMORANDUM FOR: HONORABLE HAROLD BR06dN SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HONORABLE JUANITA M. KREPS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE HONORABLE ROBERT M. FROSCH ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL_AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION FROM: JAMES T. McINTYRE, JR. (5i~i;a;1) Sim DIRECTOR SUBJECT: Review of Peteorological and Oceanic Satellite Programs As directed by PD/NSC-42, during the FY 1980 budget review OMB conducted an interagency crosscutting review of meteorological satellite programs and the ZBB priority ranking of the proposed new start of a National Oceanic Satellite System (NOSS). Concerning the meteorological satellite programs, I have concluded that significant savings appear to be possible from converging the civil and military programs. In this regard, as you know, we are approaching a critical decision period for the selection of next-generation meteorological satellite systems which will be needed by DOD and Commerce for launch by the Space Shuttle in the 1985 time period. I understand that the Policy Review Committee (Space) is tasked to assess the feasibility and policy implications of program consolidation. In addition, the Polar-Orbiting Operational Meteorological Satellite Control Board (POOMSCB) is proceeding with a study of future system convergence and is expected to have a draft study completed shortly. We will be very interested in reviewing the POOMSCB's assessment of convergence alterna- tives (covering technical, institutional, cost/benefit, efficiency, and policy issues). Should a single operational management system be directed, the question of timing and which agencies would develop and/or operate such a system would also need to be addressed. The policy guidance of PD/NSC-37 should be considered in developing the options, as should approaches which maximize the cost-effective utilization of the Shuttle (e.g., on-orbit testing, retrieval, and refurbishment). In addition, the study should include the option of consolidating the operational management of the r Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 existing polar-orbiting satellites. I would appreciate it if the draft report on the subjects outlined. above could be provided to OMB staff by March 1, 1979, with copies to NSC and OSTP staff and. the Integrated Remote- Sensing Task Force. Pending completion of the ongoing review, I request that the agencies involved not take any steps which might contribute to divergence of the civil and military meteorological programs (e.g., unilaterally committing to acquisition of a particular system for a next-generation polar-orbiting meteorological satellite). ~' Concerning oceanic satellite programs, during the FY-1980 budget review the proposed initiation of NOSS was deferred for further consideration in the FY 1981 budget review. I am pleased that the participating agencies took the initiative to implement the President's guidance on close coordination among the sectors of the space program. However, we were concerned about the high cost of the project compared with current uncertainty over the project's benefits. In addition, the relative priority of NOSS in the agencies' ZBB ranking was considered, as was the proposed funding arrangements under which NASA would pay most of the project's cost. If you intend to request funds in the FY 1981 budget for a new oceanic satellite system, I would like you to analyze options to reduce the total cost of the system while still maintaining the most important potential benefits. It would also be very helpful if you would review alternative funding arrangements for NOSS which. would increase the proportion of the investment cost paid by the user agencies. A report on the issues outlined above should be submitted to the Integrated Remote-Sensing System Task Force by March 1, 1979, with copies to Dr. Press, Dr. Brzezinski, and myself. OMB's contact point for these efforts is Mr. Daniel H. Taft, Deputy Associate Director (Special Studies), National Security and International Affairs. Copies to: Secretary of State Director of Central Intelligences Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs and Policy Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 ,w Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET WASHINGTON. D.C. 20503 MEMORANDUM FOR: DR. ROBERT R. FROSCH, ADMINISTRATOR NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION FROM: JAMES T. McINTYRE, JR.,_, ~.; - DIRECTOR l' ?~~~~ c; ~{ SUBJECT: Integrated Remote-Sensing Systems Study As directed by PD/NSC-42, during the FY 1980 budget review OMB conducted for the President a crosscutting review of strategies for the future of our civil remote-sensing efforts. In this connection, the Administration decided to commit to the continuity of remote-sensing data for civil use through the 1980's. However, issues remain on the appropriate technology mix, organizational arrangements, and potential to involve the private sector. I would greatly value your-ideas on these issues. Concerning the appropriate mix of remote-sensing capabilities to meet the priority needs of civilian users in the 1980's, I understand that the Task Force on Integrated Remote-Sensing Systems will examine the relative value and capabilities of aircraft, satellite systems (including classified), and Shuttle-based systems for meeting identified civilian data requirements. We will be interested in reviewing the comparative costs, benefits, and operating efficiencies of the various options in the Task Force's report. Concerning the organizational issues raised by PD/NSC-42, I would appreciate it if the interagency Task Force on Integrated Remote-Sensing Systems could examine an alternative which would provide for the designa- tion of a single lead agency within the Government that could assume operating responsibilities for future civil remote-sensing activities. The lead agency could, for example, be responsible for: ? aggregating and determining Government-wide priorities for civil remote-sensing information; ? establishing necessary procedures for encouraging private sector involvement in remote sensing, including possible access to classified systems (based on the results of the private sector involvement study recently amalgamated with the Integrated Remote-Sensing Systems Study); Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 ? establishing operational procedures for civilian use of classified systems and technology; ? operating and supervising future dedicated civil remote-sensing systems if and when these become justified; ? implementing appropriate pricing and financing policies for civil remote-sensing activities; and ? establishing appropriate operational procedures for any future international participation in civil remote sensing. In addition, I have requested that interagency studies on both the meteorological and oceanic satellite programs be provided to the Integrated Remote-Sensing Systems Study by March 1, 1979, for integration into your overall study effort. I think that by continuing to work together on these issues we can make a great deal of progress this year. This request for your further assistance has been coordinated with Dr. Press and Dr. Brzezinski. OMB's contact point for this effort is Mr. Daniel H. Taft, Deputy Associate Director (Special Studies), National Security and International Affairs. The Secretary of State The Secretary of Defense The Secretary of Interior The Secretary of Agriculture The Secretary of Commerce The Secretary of Energy The Administrator, Agency for International Development The Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency The Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff The Director, National Science Foundation The Director of Central Intelligence Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs and Policy Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/02/08: CIA-RDP10M02313R000704000004-6 _??