ATLANTIC PROVINCES UNION SUGGESTED.

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP08C01297R000800210008-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 27, 2012
Sequence Number: 
8
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
April 5, 1966
Content Type: 
CABLE
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP08C01297R000800210008-5.pdf125.97 KB
Body: 
-MMWM/PA..11UN T.\ ? if T? ? 1-,??????? ??? A ik _ Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/27 : CIA-RDPO8C01297R000800210008-5 .57 d k v , R A RM/ R ARA EUR FE N EA Cu I 72 10 F80 AID AGR F INT LAB TAR TR XMB AIR ARMY CIA 0 A VY 030 USIA MSA Drafted by: TO 32 NO. ? f :Department of State Info :Ottawa, Saint John, St. John's, FOR RM USE ONLY ii \ UP INOIC AT FROM 1J.S.ConSulate General, Halifax DATE: April 5, 1966. SUBJECT :Atlantic Provinces Union Suggested. REF Suggesting that the time is "opportune" for some form of7 political union of Canada's Atlantic Provinces into the single province of "Atlanta," Edward G. Byrne, Q.C., the Bathurst lawyer who chaired New Brunswick's controversial Byrne commission report on municipal reforms, told Dartmouth's chamber of commerce such union would be essential with evolve- ment of a strong federal government in Canada. He said the far-reaching recommendations of the Byrne report, with particular reference to the proposals aimed at creating fiscal equity through standardized assessment and tax- ation on a provincial basis would "well warrant study" for application to such an Atlantic Provinces merger on an overall basis although the report was aimed only at New. Brunswick's problems and was not framed with the total area in mind. Mr. Byrne said Canada's minority government situation was conducive to the evolvement of co-operative federalism now growing in Canada. He contended, however, that instead, the provinces of Canada should be becoming "more subservient" to a strong central government--and that in view of this need Canadians should be asking themselves which should come first "provincial rights or Canadian rights." He said the leadership existed in both Nova Scotia (Premier Stanfield) and in New Brunswick (Premier Robichaud) which could provide the strong national governments required. FORM 4-62 DS-323 Con,t ?Uff01:4148IP-1-ED? RSBlack:rc Clearances: RSBlack April 5, 1966 Contents and Classification Approved-by: F R DEPT. US ONLY In Ont Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/27: CIA-RDP08001297R000800210008-5 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/27: CIA-RDP08001297R000800210008-5 UNCLASSIFIED -2- When sUch federal strength becomes evident--the needs for Atlantic union would increase accordingly, he said. Comment: As reported previously, possibility of a union first came from Premier Robichaud of New Brunswick, who a year ago proposed a study be made "on possible political union of the Maritime provinces (Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and P.E.I.)." Maritime - not Atlantic provinces were specified since Premier Smallwood of Newfoundland had indicated no interest in joining such a union, if ever formed. Nova Scotia and New Brunswick each approved legislation a year ago to establish committees to study the advantages and disadvantages. A Joint investigating committee was set up but, so far as is known, has not met. Furthermore, a committee chairman has not been named. About the chairman: Premier Robichaud was recently quoted in the press as saying, "We are looking for a prominent man from outside the Maritimes, one who is not biased. That is a rare bird indeed." --7 LaL-1/, Robert S. Black, United States Consul Genera CC: U.S.Embassy, Ottawa (2) ?.t Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/27: CIA-RDP08001297R000800210008-5