CZECHOSLOVAK-AUSTRIAN FRONTIER: HISTORICAL SURVEY, 1918-1939

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP08C01297R000400230009-6
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 22, 2016
Document Release Date: 
October 18, 2012
Sequence Number: 
9
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
August 5, 1943
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP08C01297R000400230009-6.pdf522.68 KB
Body: 
.f Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 DEPARTMENI Of CONFIDENTIAL It Confidential 41'45\ CZECHOSLOVAK-AUSTRIAN FRONTIER: HISTORICAL SURVEY, 1918-1939 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE FRONTIER AREA 1. Area ATI , T-360 August 5 1943 The area involved is located on the Czechoslovak side of the 1937 frontier, in Southern Bohemia and Moravia, and comprises the political districts of. Kaplice, iffeboril. Hradec Jindiqchuv in Southern Bohemia, and-DaLce, Bud6jovice Moravske, Znojmo and Mikulov in Moravia. The total area of these frontier districts is about 2,160 square miles (5,589 square kilometers). 2. Population The population of these districts, according to the Czechoslovak census of 1930, is shown in the fol- lowing table (All starred districts (*) are directly on the frontiers. Underlined districts are political districts; others are administrative or judicial dis- tricts): TABLE I Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18 : CIA-RDPO8001297R000400230009-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 -2- TABLE I DiOyict Kaplice* (Kaplitz) Brod VONf*(Hohen- furth) Brady Noi4*(Gratzen) Kaplice* (Kaplitz) Tfebori* (Wittingau) Lomnice (Lomnitz) Tfebon* (Gmdnd) Veself (Weseli) Hradec Jindfichuv* (Neu- : haus) Hradec Jindfichuv Bystfice Nov* (Neu- bistritz) Dance* (Datschitz) ---6-Z-Ice Slavonice* (Zlabings) Tele Budejovice Moravske* (Marisch Budwitz) Buajovice Moravsk4 Jemnice* (Jamnitz) Znojmo* (Znaim) Jaroslavice* (Joslo- witz) Vranov* (Frain) Znojmo* Mikulov* (Nikolsburg) Mikulov* (Feldsberg) Pohofelice (Pohrlitz) : Area ; SQ. 933 ? Total : Pogulation * ? 324 : 18,435 259 14,332 350 * . 17,517 892 : 55,690 200 9.593 463 ? . 30,522 229 : 15.575 : 711 : 46,$18 504 : 35,708 50,284 207 : 11,110 20 : 11,876 195 9.275 410 : . 25,483 661 : 142E,221 399 : 23,140 262 : 14,168 1,020 : 103,125 272 : 26,314 218 : 10,365 530 : 66,41-6 56353,563 373 : 36,948 190 : 16,615 Germans : Number : Czechoslovaks : Number ? % ? ? ? ? 44,281 88.06 5453 11.84 17,453 94.67 12,300 85.82 14,528 82.94 2,037 3.66 18 .19 1,978 6.48 41 .26 968 2,017 2,968 53,50 9,568 28,485 15,497 5.25 14.07 16.95 96.16 99.74 93.33 99.50 jita? 36.8 : 29,419 62.84 7,536 21.10 : 28,102 78.70 9,780 88.03 ? ? 1,317 11.85 7,0684 .15.16 ? ? 39,1477 84.65, 210 1.77 : 11,635 97.97 6,753 72.81 ? ? 2,506 27.02 105 .41 : 25,336 99.42 ? 37,551 _93.16 ? 25,935 99.22 11,616 81.99 40,114 38.92 2.501 9.51 ? ? 3.398 32.78 34,235 51.52 78.619,15)4 17.09 21 1.97 ? ? ? 11,733 28.48 633 6.53 2,471 ? .62 17.44 62,156 60.27 23,780 6,915 31,461 142,107 30,1414.2 11,665 90.37 66.71 47.35 82.39 70.20 T ta ? 1 600 41.32 2.01.417 57.80 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 - Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 -3- In the administrative sub-districts directly touching the frontier (Brod VysNi, Hrady Nove, Kaplice, Trebori, Bystilice Nov, Slavonice, Jemnice, Jaroslavice, Vranov, Znojmo, and Mikulov), which cover an area of 3,448 square kilometers .(1,331 square miles), there are 157,861 Germans (59.32 percent)., and 94,232 Czechoslovaks (39.56 percent), in a total population of 255,432. 3. ToDegraphy The primary topographic importance of these fron- tier regions arises from therelevation of the Southern B8hmerwald (nmava),7which is about seventy-eight miles in length. In the district of Kaplice it has an average elevation of'more than 1,000 jeters or about 3,200 feet. The land slopes toward the Luznice River, an affluent of the Vltava (Moldau); in a valley of about 500 meters (1,640 feet) elevation. The region of GmRnd City is at a similar elevation. The Bohemian-Moravian Highlands, which penetrate into the district of Hradec Jindnchuv, have an elevation of from 1,500 to 2,000 feet. In Dance, however, the elevation isqnly about 1,050 feet. In Znojmo it rises to about 1,300 feet, and near Mikulov (Nikolsburg City) the elevation rises to about 1,800 feet and diminishes toward the valley of the Morava (March) River, which drains practically all the rivers of Moravia. 4. Communications There were nine international railway stations along the 1937 Austro-Czechoslovak frontier: Horn f DvoiliXtg, nske Velenice,-Slavnice,:gatov, Hrugovany-gar3ov, Novosedly-Drnholec, Breclav, Marchegg, and Kopcany. Prague and Plzen (Pilsen). are connected with Linz, Salz- burg and the Adriatic S n ea through sk6 Budnovice ..(Budweis) and the Horni, Dvor'igt6, and with Vienna through tusk( Velenice .(near Gmand). Prague is also connected with Vienna through Znojmo via the Brno-155ec1av route. The B5eclav-Va1tice-Znolmo (Lundenburg-Feldsberg-Znaim) railway, running parallel to the 1937 frontier about four hundred meters (1,300 feet) north of it, was an im- portant railway branch. The Bnclav region contains the conjunction of all routes crossing the Moravian Gap, along Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 ? -4- along the so-called Vienna-Silesian route. The Vltava and the Morava are not genuinely navigable rivers in the regions under discussion, though the Morava might be so considered for smaller river vessels, if. regulated. In its lower course it becomes sluggish, with the char- acteristics of a river of the plain. 5. Economy' In the Southern Bftmerwald (gumava) wood industries and agrieulture predominate, while cereals are cultivated in a large belt of land paralleling the B8hmerwald, from Cheb to Gmund. Southern Bohemia is the paper-making center and in part the brewery of Czechoslovakia. It is also a center of pencil manufacturing and paper mills. In the region of Kaplice starches and cotton goods are produced. Cereals, especially rye and oats, and pota- toes are raised in the nearby hills. Much sugar is pro- duced in the valley of the Morava River from Olomouc to the Danube River. In the Dyje valley manufacturing (breweries, distilleries, canneries, tanneries) and agri- culture (vegetables, wine) are important. The district of Mikulov (Feldsberg), in Moravia, is also known for textiles and quick-lime. 11. Igg AWRIAN-CZECHOSLOVAK BOUNDARY PROBLEM AT THE PARIS CONFERENCE 1. Mlle Czechoslovak Frontier Claims 2121919 . At the Paris Peace Conference, the Czechoslovak Delegation, with respect to the Austrian-Czechoslovak frontiers, demanded the historic boundaries of Bohemia and Moravia,. with minor rectifications in the regions of Gmfind and Mikuloy (Feldsberg) ("Mdmoire No. 10. Prob- lemes des Rectifications des frontieres tchecoslovaques et Germano-Autriehietnes", Revue de Droit International, XIII, No. 4, Oct.-Nov.-Dec. 1938, 486-93). The Czecho- slovak Delegation asserted that the natural frontier between Moravia and Austria was formed by the watershed of the Chuba and Smeda, direct tributaries of the Danube, and Of the tributaries of the Dyje River and the lower Morava River. Thence, beginning at Korneuberg, it ran along Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 -5- along the course of the Dahube. All the territory to the north of this line, it was claimed, was impregnated with a Czech element and its work. For ethnic and eco- nomic reasons, the Czechs also claimed a small rectifi- cation in the Dyje valley west Of Znojmo (Inalm), leaving Hradek (Hardegg), Merkersdoff, and the castle of Karlslust in Moravia. For the purpose of rounding out its frontiers, and for ethnic and ecvomic reasons, the Czechs also demanded the Gmfind (TreboX) region, and for economic and strategic reasons they demanded a rectification of the Austrian-Bohemian frontier in the region of the upper Vltava (Moldau) River. 2. Recommendations .g11 Ihi Commission on Czech?Slovak la.i2/ As early as February 2',..1919 the Commission on Czechoslovak Affairs accepted the principle of preserv- ing the 1914 frontiers of Bohemia and Moravia, subject to such minor rectifications as might seem desirable. After-a number of meetings, on May:9 the Commission unanftouly recommended that the town of Gmfind be given to Austria, while the railway station of Gmund, about two miles from the town itself, should be assigned to Czechoslovakia; the station formed an important junction for southern Bohemia, where the two great Czechoslovak lines from Prague via T4bor to Gmfindt and from Plzen (Pilsen) via CeskrffadZjovice, meet (Miller Diary, XVI, 234-35). Moreover, the Commission thought it of great Importance that-CZechoslovakia should control the Course of the Morava River in. order to be able to construct canals to serve.Morav.ia,- Therefore, it recommended that the frontier be:drawn-at the town of Feldsberg (Valtice), at the confluence of the Thaya and Morava rivers, so as to leave the Morava entirely in Czechoslovakia. The rail- way which followed the Morava River at varying distances was to be left within Austria, since it was necessary in the Austrian system of communications with Vienna. Thus, in the regions of Gmiind and Feldsberg, two small pieces of Austrian territory were assigned to Czechoslovakia. At the meeting 'of the Council of Ten on May 12, 1919 there were no. objections to these deviations from the old administrative-frOntiers.: At a later meeting on July 11, Secretary of State Lansing expressed approval that the deviations Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 -6- deviations from the old Austro-Bohemian-Moravian boundary line had been confined to the regions of Gmund and Feldsberg (Miller Diary, XVI, 272; Almond and Lutz, The Treaty p_flit. Germain: A Decumentary History, Standord University Press, 1935, 467). 3. Austrian Protests The government of the new Austrian Republic pro- tested vigorously against these cessions, as well as against the inclusion of the Sudeten German regions as a whole in Czechoslovakia. The Austrians claimed that, according to the census of 1910, the regions of Southern Bohemia bordering on Lower and Upper Austria were inhabited by a German population, with 197,918 Germane.; compared with 7,359 Czechs, while the southern part of Moravia; along the Austrian border, had 159,263 Germans and only 11,249 Czechoslovaks (the 1930 census indicated a much higher percentage of Czechoslovaks in both areas). They, there- fore, proposed that a plebiscite be held in all the.dis- puted districts (see especially the Austrian counter- proposals of July 10, 1919; Almond and Lutz, sg. 299-309). . . 4. .Th,g RelAY az 14,2 Allied, 1.r.1_4 Associated powers - In a reply of September 2, 1919 (Ibid., pp. 225-31, 470-71), the Allied and Associated Powers stated that they had tried to determine the boundaries of the states issu- ing from the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy "with an equity bound to give Central Europe a durable peace", and had deviated from the historic boundaries in Southern Bohemia :and Moravia in only two cases of secondary importance, where the economic interests of one of the new states :appeared to prevail over the claims of the Austrian Repub- lic. They had endeavored to insure to the Czecho-Slovak State a complete system of ways of communication. In doing so, they had to overstep slightly the historic frontier at two points; namely, in the region of the .Thaya;-in or.det'to include in the Czechoslovak territory the line Lundenburg-Feldsberg-Znaim eclav-Valtice-Znojm27, necessary for the west to -east commuhications of southern Moravia, and in the region of Gmand, in order to effect in Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 *- Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 ? ?? I??? -7- in Bohemia the junction of two trunk lines which run almost wholly through the said. province, namely, the line of Prague throuilh Tdbor, and that of Pilsen through Budweis LO eke Bud6"jovice7. 5. The Treaty of al. Germain (September 10, 1919) Article 27 of the Trelaty of St. Germain (Ibid., pp. 131-32, Section 6, Article, 27) defined the frontiers of Austria with Czechoslovakia, which began at the "point common to the three frontiers of Austria, Hungary and the Czecho-Slovak State", and then proceeded as follows from that point: a-line to be fixed on. the ground following as much as possible the Old frontier of 1867 be- tween Austria. and Hungary; thence westwards? to the Confluence of the Morava (March) with the Danube; the principal channel of navigation of the Danube; thence the Course of the Morava upstream, then the course of the Thaya upstream to a point to be selected about 2 kilometers south-east of the intersection of the Rabensburg-Themenau road with the Rabensburg-Lundenburg railway; thence west-north-westwards to a point on the old administrative boundary between lower Austria and 'Moravia situated about 400 meters south of the point where this boundary cuts the Nikolsburg- Feldsberg thence west-north-westwards the above mentioned administrative boundary.... From Moravia into southern Bohemia the line followed the old administrative boundary line between Lower Austria and Bohemia, to a point about 5 kilometers north-west of Gmfind, and then proceeded as follows: a line to be fixed on the ground passing east of the Rottenschachen-Zuggers road...; thence Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 - thence southwards and then west-north-westwards to a point on the old administrative boundary between -Lower Austria and Bohemia situated about 200 meters north of the point where it cuts the Gratzen-Weitra road; a line to be fixed on the ground passing between Zuggers and Breitensee, then through the most south-easterly point of the railway bridge over the Lainsitz leaving to Austria the town of Gmfind and to the Czecho-Slovak State the station and railway works of Gmfind (Wolfshof) and the junction of the Gmfind-Budweis and Gmfind-Wittingau railways, then passing through points 524 (Grundhabel), 577 (north of Hohenberg) and 681 (Lagerberg); thence south-westwards the above Mentioned admin- istrative boundary; then north-westwards. the old administrative boundary between Bohemia and Upper Austria to its point of junction with the frontier of Germany. Essentially, therefore, the only deviations from the old administrative line separating Austria. from Bohemia and Moravia were at Gmfind and Feldsberg. Ili. TERRITORIAL ASPECTS OF THE MUNICH SETTLEMENT ON THE FORMER AUSTRIAN-CZECHOSLOVAK - FRONTIER 1. Area az_10, Population Along the Austrian-Czecsholovak borders of Bohemia and Moravia, the lines drawn as a consequence of the Munich Settlement of September 30, 1938 ceded the follow- ing regions (2,288 square miles) to Germany (areas and populations involved are estimated on the basis ofthe 1930 census). TABLE II Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6 -9- TABLE II District : : Area : sq. km.: Krumlov tesk5; * ? : : : : ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? : : ? ? ? ? ? 1,156 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Krum;ov Ceski Plana Horn/* Kaplice* 297 387 372 93? Brod Vynf,* Hrady Nov* ,Kaplice* Trebon* 32 259 350 463 11 Treboil* Hradec Jindif.ishuv* Hradec Jindri,chuv tystrice Nova* Dacice* 207 195 262 1,020 Slavonice* Budejovice Moravske Jemnice Znojmo* Jaroslavice* vranov* Znojmo Krumlov horavskY: 218 530 330 563 Krumlov Moravsky Mikulov* Mikulov* Pohor.elice Hod2nfn* 373 190 293 Breclav* Total : 5,926 : Total Population ? Germans Number 61,870 12,96/ 33,34,3 15,560 0 284 1 14,332 17,517 30,522 46,818 35,708 11,110 9,275 i14,76 103 12 10,365 66,446 28,671 6 1414,9914 18,846 15,164 44,281 17,455 lg000 14,528 i,978 7L3 Czechoslovaks Number 72.72 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 16,780 _2/2.113.: 15.28 43.25 2.48 11.84 k.71 56.52 97.46 88.o6 1,982 14,421 386 94.67 85.82 82.94 6.48 6. 6. 8 9 2,017 l .07 12,968 16.95 28,485 93.33 29,141962.84 53 - 0 9,780 88.03 6,753 72.81 2,471 17.44 62,1 6 60.2 2 0 6,915 66.71 31,461 47.35 ,8,257 28.80 42,10 78.61 2 B2.39 11,665 70.20 1,992 4.64 ? : 20,286 : 9,154 17.0 : 4:733 23,102 78.78 1,317 11.85 2,506 27.02 11,616 81.99 40 1 4 38 92 9 32.78 51.52 3,398 34,335 70.75 40,056 93.21 441,872 : 232.305 55,38 : 204.398 44.62 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/10/18: CIA-RDP08001297R000400230009-6