IRAN-AFGHANISTAN: TROUBLE OVER THE HELMAND RIVER WATERS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
C
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
September 6, 2012
Sequence Number: 
4
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 18, 1971
Content Type: 
MISC
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5.pdf156.86 KB
Body: 
Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16 :CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5 1 j `"% = nnur e.. r.~r.n. ------ -- INTELLIGENCE. NOTE November 18, 1971 IRAN-AFGHANISTAN: TROUBLE OVER THE HELMAND RIVER WATERS Three years of drought have revived differences between Iran and Afghanistan over the division of the Helmand River waters in the arid :regions along their common borders. This issue has been an irritant to Iran-Afghan relations since 1872, and the two countries have been trying ~~ to reach a foro>al agreement on it since the ear1~ 195Q;~. The Afghan government says it intends to press on with conclusion and parlia- mentary consideration of the nearly-complete agreement, but mutual distrust, misunderstandings, and recriminations over the use of what little water there is this year have injected an extra note of strain into Tehran- Kabu7 relations. The current controversy was triggered in June 197] by the visit to Kabu] of an Iranian fact-finding mission sent to investigate Helmand water shortages. Afghan legislators and the Kabul vernacular press saw Iranian complaints about the paucity of Helmand water reaching Iran's Sistan province as symptomatic of the overbearing attitude of the Iranians toward their "country cousins" in Afghanistan. Afghan ill- feeling was enhanced by the GOI's issuance, during last month`s 25th This ?port was produced by the Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Aside from normd substantive exchange with other agencies at the working level, it has not been coordinoted elsewhere. ~ 1^'("~; ~ n e i Excluded from automatic down grading and declassification Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16 :CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16 :CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5 .~, ~..,r::y ~:: t;l' 62 64 I - 36 36 f I U. S.S.R. ~' ~` ~ IRAN-AFGHANISTAN BPr BP as BOUNDARY - 8P 99 oHerat Present boundary P +, B?'? Selected boundary pillar BP 33 Other international boundary 0 25 50 75 Miles BP 34 0 25 50 75' Klome'ers BP ea BP 6J BOUNDARY BRIEF The Afghanistan-Iran boundary is approximately 550 miles in length. Ir is demarcated throughout its entire length but the precise cundinon of the markers, many of which have been m piacr tut BP 72 70 years, is nut known. i N A N~ The b?undary teaversrs grid desert throughout I A F G H A I S its entire length. Population is sparse except m T I ~ ^ ""' N the Hari Rtid end Helmand River basins. ' / ~ ~ \ BP 74 U.S.S.R. CHINA 3' --- BP er --1-- 32 -- -- J8K AFGHANISTAN :~ REA i - ~~~~ Hdmun-e OF BP ao tBP ~~I Sdber7 IRAN MAP SfAH ~ Kl%H ? LJ/ ~ ~ BP 6H / t ~ \ ~ ~ \1 ~i Darybcheh?ye~ P A K I S T A N _ Siston i ~ 34 \~ ~ 1 \ INDIA I f BP S . % ~ i ARAB/AN SF.A ~ ,,. 1 i Source of Doto: Office o{ the I Geogropher, Deportment o/ $tote Sistan F.__ Ilclnland fZivrrr tt, ar i _. .- ;,t n irlf t MAf lA OrA1I PAKISTAN {.'1 {i~ .~ f~/1 .ae a ,;.."V @ l 'r B Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16 :CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5 Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16 :CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5 ~1~ ~ ~CO(~t=111~i~TI~I ~ ~ ~. `` -2- Centenary celebrations, of maps and publicity handouts featuring past Persian control of large areas now belonging to Afghanistan. The Afghan government is hampered by the need to proceed cautiously in dealing with its inexperienced parliament. Any appearance of capitu- lation to Iranian pressure could lead to demonstrations by unruly Afghan+Y farmers already critical of government relief measures in the drought- stricken regions. On the Iranian side, the government is under some pressure from the waterless inhabitants of Sistan; the bureaucracy is probably getting a distorted picture of the facts in the case from subordinate officials; and Tehran's willingness to compromise may well be reduced by the general Iranian conviction that Afghans are slow and devious. The Helmand waters dispute generally subsides when water is plenti- ful. This year's crisis is important only if it further delays a formal agreement on the division of the waters. Fortunately, both sides are responding favorably to U.S. counsels of restraint and seem to be moving toward an interim resolution of the dispute through resort to an im- partial fact-finding and mediatory mission from the World Bank, whose experts have considerable knowledge of the technicalities of the problem and of the region. It~lt/iiear East and South Asia Director: Curtis F. Jones Analyst Peter S. ~laher~y: Ext. 21430 CUNT IUEN~TIAL 1~ " . Declassified and Approved For Release 2012/11/16 :CIA-RDP08C01297R000100130004-5