NICARAGUA: THE ECONOMY AND SANCTIONS

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
S
Document Page Count: 
18
Document Creation Date: 
December 27, 2016
Document Release Date: 
April 10, 2013
Sequence Number: 
1
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
July 15, 1988
Content Type: 
REPORT
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5.pdf870.48 KB
Body: 
Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Central Intelligence Agency D/ALA j Room 3F45 HQ DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE 15 July 1988 Nicaragua: The Economy and Sanctions Summary The Nicaraguan economy has deteriorated markedly since the 1979 revolution. Anti-private sector policies, combined with financial mismanagefent and rising defense costs have depressed economic activity, constrained exports, and forced the regime to ignore its international creditors. The regime has recently adopted a series of reform programs in an effort to alleviate the economic deterioration, but hyperinflation, poor infrastructure, and continued serious foreign exchange constraints will continue to limit progress. Circumventing US economic sanctions has caused trade disruptions and diversion of financial and managerial resources which have exacerbated the economic deterioration. We estimate that through the end of last year the US trade embargo against Nicaragua cost about $115 million'in lost export earnihjb, More expensive . imports, and middlemen fees. Ihditect costs also have been significant, but are harder to quantify. Shortages of US-produced spare parts, machinery and other inputs have stunted production and contributed to inflationary pressures. This typescript was prepared by the Nicaragua Branch, Middle America Cuba Division, Office of African and Latin American Analysis. Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed to the Chief, Middle American-Cuba Division, ALA, 25X1 25X1 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 The Nicaraguan economy remains marginally vulnerable to further tightening of the US embargo. The 30 or so US companies operating in Nicaragua continue to provide important services to the economy from oil refining and distribution to computer software. At the same time, expenditures from US travellers and remittances from support groups and relatives in the United States probably provide as much as $25 million annually in scarce foreign exchange. General Economic Situation The Nicaraguan economy has fallen to record depths since it began its post-Somoza decline in 1981, primarily because the regime has put political considerations ahead of economic ones. In real terms, overall economic activity has fallen more than one-third below pre-revolutionary levels. Per capita income is roughly half its 1977 level despite a nearly four-fold increase in economic aid since 1979. Inflation, which began Spiraling in 1985, climbed to an annual rate of 16,500 percent earlier this year. Not surprisingly, exports have declined to about one third of that registered during the last years of the Somoza era. In our judgment, economic policies driven primarily by political concerns are responsible. for the steady deterioration of the economy. Specific policies contributing to the decline include: The regime's seizure of much of the economy from the private sector. Blatant and capricious anti-business acts --including the uncompensated seizure of productive farms and businesses--has led to massive capital flight, driven many of the economic elite out of the country, and alienated the rest. The remaining private farms and businesses have deteriorated from lack of investment, and business leaders say that many landowners and manufacturers stay in Nicaragua only to protect their assets while hoping for a change in the government. o Tight bureaucratic controls that have choked production. For example, until recently, private farmers had to have their crop plans approved before planting; buy all their seeds, fertilizers, and insecticides from the government; hire labor from Sandinista unions at fixed wages; and sell their produce to the state at artificially low prices. the text. 1 See economic indicators in Figures 1 through 4 at the end of 2 sT rRPT Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 While low prices provide party members.with inexpensive food and other consumer goods, this practice inevitably has resulted in shortages of goods for the general population. Sandinista financial mismanagement that has impeded production, driven up the public sector deficit, and fed inflation. Subsidized interest rates to state farms and businesses as well as party loyalists have . inflicted. losses on the State-owned banking system. These borrowers often have used the funds to buy luxury items instead of investment goods while private farmers and businessmen have been denied funds to purchase needed inputs. o Rapidly rising defense costs, especially since 1983, that have siphoned off an increasing share of scarce resources. The military now consumes 65 percent, o? the central government's budget and has been a major contributor in. driving the non-financial public sector deficit from 6 percent of GDP in 1979 to over 50 percent last year. The depressed domestic output has had a major impact on Nicaragua's international accounts. Declining exports have driven. the trade balance from a $52 million surplus in 1978 to an average annual deficit of more than $500 million during the past three years.2 With debt service. added to the trade deficit, the amount of assistance required to cover Managua's annual-foreign... obligations has risen from nearly zero in 1979 to more than $1.3 billion last year- equivalent to more than half-of the country's annual GDP. While many.official creditors have responded generously to Sandinista calls for debt reschedulings, loans, and credits, foreign assistance has not increased fast enough to meet Managua's import and financial needs. Last year, imports were 25 percent lower than 1981 levels in current dollars, worsening consumer shortages, particularly in the cities. As a result, since 1981 the Sandinistas have been increasingly inclined to ignore their debt obligations, alienating commercial banks, multilateral organizations, and many bilateral Western lenders in the process.3 The regime has sought to make up for the loss of Western aid with assistance from the Soviet Bloc. Soviet Bloc aid, however, has been mostly technical assistance and low quality goods rather than production-enhancing investment funds and capital goods previously 2 See table 1. 3 See the Nicaraguan foreign profile in table 2. 3 SF.C'.RF.T Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 supplied by the West. By 1986, moreover, Moscow was beginning to demand some payment for its assistance and started to question Managua's constant requests for more aid, charging that much of the aid already provided was being wasted. ~I 25X1 Attempts at Economic Reform The gap between falling production and.the ever-increasing need for foreign assistance forced the regime to slow its policy of expanding state control and adopt some economic reform measures in mid-1987. These measures--including indexing salaries to inflation and easing some price and distribution controls--failed to revive the economy, however, because the underlying causes of the economic crisis were not addressed. By early 1988, shortages of oil and other imports were crippling production-and soaring inflation was destroying Nicaragua's currency and undermining the Sandinistas' hold on the economy. Moreover, Managua's insistence on maintaining price, wage, and exchange rate controls--even in the face of additional reforms announced in February--further undercut production. In our view, the threat of further economic deterioration led the regime to back away from total control of the economy further `last month. Managua eliminated many wage and price controls, implemented an 85 percent devaluation of the cordoba against the dollar, increased credit to farmers with political ties to-the regime, and indexed interest rates and . the. exchange rate-to . inflation. The regime, however, made it clear that such measures did not mean that the Sandinistas were renouncing Marxist-Leninism. In a speech announcing the measures, Ortega admitted that the reforms are a tactical necessity to protect the revolution. He threatened to "bury" the private sector if it fails to increase production and investment. The regime recently carried through on this threat by expropriating several properties including the country's largest privately-owned sugar refinery. Outlook for the Coming Year Numerous constraints, however, will keep production increases modest at best, despite the government's reform efforts. o Inflation--which we believe will not be substantially reduced unless defense spending is slashed--poses the greatest challenge. If the higher rates brought on by the reforms are sustained beyond a few months, productivity will suffer because more of, the economy will slip into the less efficient black market system, and the currency will again be in jeopardy of losing its transaction value. o Output also will be limited by the government's insolvency and increasingly dilapidated infrastructure. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 i 25X1 Should the regime retain or tighten export controls it could negate many of the reforms' potential benefits. Faced with discontent within the party, the Sandinistas could backtrack on the reforms. Minor concessions to party loyalists-- including increased credit for state'farms and cooperatives--could easily fail to buy their backing, forcing the Sandinistas to choose between rescinding some of the measures or.losing political support. Nearly all groups within the party will likely want to dump those reforms that have taken away their access to cheap hard currency, gutted education, health and other social programs,,and forced state-controlled farms and businesses to compete more equally with private producers. Finally, poor relations with theeUnited States and other traditional lenders and the domestic business' sector make it unlikely that the Sandinistas will be able to revitalize the economy any time soon, in our judgment. Managua is unlikely to attract the billions of dollars in investment needed to bring the Nicaraguan economy back to pre-revolution production levels. The renewal of expropriations this week and Ortega's venomous attacks on the private sector during a speech last month . almost. certainly means that businessmen will remain reluctant to risk-major investments. Furthermore, the Soviets, while interested in maintaining the Sandinistas.in power by providing oil and vital foodstuffs, have shown no signs that the are willing to invest heavily in the rebuilding of Nicaragua. Impact of Current US Sanctions Trade disruptions and the diversion of financial and managerial resources to circumvent US economic sanctions--imposed in May 1985--have put additional pressure on the Nicaraguan economy.. We calculate that through the end of 1987 the US measures have.directly cost Managua $115 million--over and above the $320 million decline that had been experienced since the 1979 revolution--because of the loss of access to US markets, higher freight costs for exports and imports and new middlemen fees to circumvent the embargo. On the export side, we estimate that direct sanction-related losses have cost the Sandinistas $70 million in net foreign exchange losses since the embargo was announced. Of this amount, $20 million was lost during the last seven months of 1985, $28 million during 1986, and $22 million last year .4 In our view, major losses have occurred in the following areas: a See table 3. 5 ST RF.T Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 25X1 o We estimate that net hard currency earnings from beef exports have fallen'some $24 million. since May 1985 because. of the embargo. Efforts to find alternate markets in Canada and elsewhere have been mostly unsuccessful, according to Embassy o Loss of the US sugar market has cost Managua about . - $15 million. Since the Sandinistas lost the US sugar quota, they have had to sell largely on the glutted world market at less than one-third the, subsidized US price.- o Net foreign exchange earnings from banana exports have fallen by another $15 million since the embargo was implemented. While new sales to West European customers have taken up some of the slack, higher transportation.costs and--product deterioration during-the longer shipping time have sharply cut profit margins. 25X1 25X1 o During the same timeframe, net foreign-exchange losses::from lower passenger and cargo revenue and higher prices fox maintenance and spare parts have cost Aeronica--the state airline--about $6 million, according. to official Nicaraguan-.., estimates The 25X1 Sandinistas have been able to limit Aeronica losses somewhat by selling Nicaraguan tours out ,of - US 'travel agencies and rescheduling some flights through Mexico, Honduras, and Costa Rica. o Despite success, on. Managua's . part, . in.. redirecting -seafood and tobacco exports, we estimate-that sanctions have cut Nicaragua's net foreign exchange earnings by $9 million. On. the import side, we estimate direct foreign exchange expenses from higher prices. and new middlemen fees to. regain access to priority US-sanctioned goods have cost,. the'Sandinistas about $45 million, including $14 million in 1985, $16 million in 1986, and $15 million in 1987. the Sandinistas are only gradually reducing their dependency on US goods-. while the Sandinistas have found some new supplie rs for much of the foodstuffs and raw materials formerly provided by US sources, they have not done nearly as well replacing imports of US-built machinery, agrc'chen _cals, and spare. parts.. W.1-hile costs of regaining access to priority US-sanctioned goods varies considerably; an-average 25X1 25X1 6 SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24 : CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 i 25X1 additional 25-percent markup to obtain these goods through third- country US subsidiaries or by using front companies to procure the items in the United States. As a result we estimate that from May 1985 through last year: o The Sandinistas have paid an extra $34 million to buy priority US-manufactured spare parts, machinery, and chemicals because of embargo-circumvention surcharges. o Managua has paid an extra $11 million to retain access to raw materials and semi-finished and consumer goods. While the Sandinistas have made some progress in reducing their reliance on imported US goods and services, we estimate that it will be years before they can work their way completely free of dependency on US supplies. at least Half of Nicaragua s existing capital stock (plants, factories, machinery, and equipment) is still dependent on US spare parts and equipment despite the longstanding Sandinista policy of cutting economic ties to the United States. . The indirect costs of the embargo to the economy are much more difficult to quantify. the 25X1 embargo has required substantial bureaucratic attention, which has further strained Managua's ability to address critical domestic economic issues and development projects. Moreover, where the. Sandinistas have been able to find replacement imports for US goods in either the West or the Soviet Bloc and thus avoid the costs of circumvention, the shortage.of 25X1 adequate replacement parts for US-made plants-and machinery continues to stunt production in a wide range of activities. For example, the domestic commercial fishing fleet has been virtually disabled by lack of spare parts, although Managua has limited foreign exchange losses by leasing some of its fishing grounds to Cuba and to private fishermen in Costa Rica and Honduras. The Sandinistas have also had to eliminate jobs in banana field operations and in government-owned meat-packing plants because of lower foreign trade demand, according to Embassy 25X1 reporting. In the aggregate, we believe these factors have played a substantial role in dampening economic activity, increasing consumer and producer shortages, and accelerating triple-digit inflation rates. 25X1 Remaining Vulnerabilities Tightening US economic sanctions could further reduce Managua's access to US goods, technology and financing at the margin. We calculate, for example, that restricting economic aid on financial remittances from US persons to official and private Nicaraguan recipients could cut Managua's foreign exchange receipts 7 .qF.rPT T Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 ' 25X1 ' I I by as much as $20 million per year, or about 10 percent of 1988 estimated export earnings. In addition, limiting travel to Nicaragua by Sandinista support groups and other US tourists probably would shave off another $5 million in earnings. Prohibiting US citizens and businesses from providing direct investments or technical, financial, or related services could also hurt Managua's efforts to minimize the impact of existing . sanctions. While the exact dollar value of such activities is difficult to calculate, it would affect areas ranging from access to computer software to refining of oil products. From the standpoint of in-country operations, only a few of the 31 US businesses remaining in Nicaragua employ US citizens. According to US business press, most of these companies have not been able to remit more than token earnings to owners and, in many cases, are staying. in country only to protect investments. In some cases, thos.e.assets are significant; for example, Exxon's.assets were.. valued at close to $100 million in early 1987, according to press Sandinista hard currency earnings could be further cut by restricting their access to third-country-US subsidiaries or tightening regulations on the import of Nicaraguan products currently allowed to enter the United-States following-minimal- processing in third countries. While either of these steps could result in legal challenges, neither would result in substantial financial costs to third countries,.and.both would hurt Managua somewhat. Even so,-some third countries would be likely to fight the steps.for political reasons in support of Nicaraguan extraterritoriality -claims?:; See table -f for a listing of US companies doing business in. Nicaragua. 6 Exxon sold two distribution centers to the Nicaraguan government in mid-1987 which would reduce figure somewhat. 8 SECRET Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Figure 1 _25X1 17. 000 r 16, 000 15, 000 14. 000 13. 000 12. 000 11. 000 10. 000 F 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 NICARAGUA: Economic Indicators. 1979-1988 Consumer Price Inflation (Percent) 1979 1981 ,963 ,985 A: Annual rate during quarter ending in January B: Annual rate during quarter ending in May jg63 19g8 14a'I igBB 6 jaT, Export Earnings and Foreign Economic Assistance Millions Current US $ 800 r 735 300 T Foreign Economic L Assistance 12 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Figure 2 NICARAGUA: ECONOMIC INDICATORS. 1979-1987 Per Capika Income ('1977 Doiiarsj 1977 1979 taj81 W93 19aS 19a7 Edta"d*d Told Non-Ftnanclal Public Sector Deficit As Share of GDP (Percent) 1981 1983= 19E3 Ect(mat.Q Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Figure Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 2.50 Coffo~ 204 . NICARAGUA; EXPORT SALES BREAKDOWN .1978-1988 ., Cotton 141~ Non-oorfoultural 10 0fhcr __ ~~ 17 5 1984 1983 1986 , 1987 1988' Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T00990R000100690001-5 Figure 4 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 ullllon Currant US 6 0 0 _T ~...~_._?_- NICARAGUA: ANNUAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE BY MAJOR SOURCE, 1979-1987 r:7~ x q.....u.......+mmaa .. r~~~~~ 06406? .......... ....~ rr......rrrrr.~rrrn ..~~rrrr~~~ ?r..r? ~ 1981 2 1983 1984 1985 1987 Legend Sovlet Bloc-Cuba Latin America HUIfIIat oral Middle East - 1979 1980. 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 10,16 1987 S , i o r ot Bloc-Cuba 20 50 90 180 270 320 450 580 535 Latin America 50 150 300, '230 220 120 80 40 40 OEC'~ 85 .140 80 95 100 90 86 103 80 iiatoral 50 120 120 65 86 75 50 35 40 dIo East 0 0 125 25 40 40 40 20 10 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Nicaragua: Balance of payments, 1979-1987. (I'll .1 1 ions LIS Dot 1 ars ) 1 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 180 -392 -563 -515 -565 -666 -856 -764 -879 Trade. Balrwice 227 -353 -422 -318. -349 -414 -545 -519 -479 Exports, F.o.b. 616 450 500 406 429 386 297 226 251 Imports., F.o.b. -389 -803 -922 -724 -778 -800 -842 -745 -730 Net Services and Tr-ansrers -47 -39 -141 -197 -216 -252 -311 -245 -400 -120 190 583 296 363 460 630 -139 135 Official 115 371 424 455 375 416 598 625 560 Debt a mor-t:i.-.etion d U 0 -117 -130 -97 -113 -341 -166 -192 -690 -500 Rescheduled debt's 138 135 92 27 418 247 154 74 125 Oi:her cap i I_:al and and omissions error, -256 -186 164 -73 -89. -37 70 -148 -50 OVERALL BALANCE 60 -202 20 -219 -202 -206 -226 -903 Increase in arrears 37 78 254 202 4 827 -744 669 Net change in reserves 60 -202 57 -141 52 -4 -222 -76 -75 =Includes conversion of Central Bank short-term liabilities from previous arrears into medium-term debt Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Nicaragua: Debt Profile* (million US $) Total Medium Long-term 5344 5650 Official 4000 4275 Multilateral 772 830 Bilateral 3228 3445 Private 1344 1375 Financial market 1310 1345 of which: US banks 59 23. Suppliers= 33 30 Short-term of which: US banks 7 20 `Does not include arrears Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Nicaragua: Direct Costs of Sanctions (million US $) 1985a 1986 1987 Total export and import lossess 34-- Export Losses 20 Beef 5 10 Sugar 7 4 Bananas 3 4 Aeronica 2 2 Seafood 2 1 Tobacco 1 1 Import losses 14 16 15 Machinery and chemicals 10 12 Other 4 4 aEmbargo phased in beginning 7 May 1985;,costs are estimated net foreign exchange losses. Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Declassified in Part - Sanitized Copy Approved for Release 2013/04/24: CIA-RDP04T0099OR000100690001-5 Acei tera Corona (United Brands) Rcumuladores Centr-o- americanos (Exide Cor-p.> Cia. Petroler-a CI-evron (Chevron Corp.) Citizen Standard Life Insur- lnce (same LIS na.me) Citibank (Citicorp) Eloctr-oquimica Pccrn.,al.t. (same US name) EmpagUeS Multi-r,-ill Ultra- Fort (St. Regis Paper) EssoStandard Oil (Exxon) Hercules de Centroamerica (Hercules) Hotel Intercontinental (same US name) IBM Hor-ld Trade Corp. (same US name) Ir d'. _rLria C_r^;nicm (American SL-andard) ITnd'rsLr- ar fl, rr7n._r (General 1i J. 1'c) IndusLrias r'I.-,f' i