RELEASE AND PROTECTION FOR TIMERMAN - 1979/09/25

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
06626785
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
April 3, 2019
Document Release Date: 
April 12, 2019
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
September 25, 1979
File: 
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2018/10/01 C06626785 CA 7929 251438Z SEP 79 VULLE INDICATE Mcouftcr E3CHAME TO 12065: E.O. %YAM TAGS: SUBJECT: ACTION: AMB DCM POL 3 POL/R ECOM ICA DAO RF CHRON FROM AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES CLASSIFICATION CONFIDENTIAL GDS 9/25/85 (FRIEDMAN, TOWNSEND SHUM AR (U) RELEASE AND PROTECTION FO SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE CONFIDENTIAL BUENOS AIRES REF: STATE 249264 1. (C � ENTIRE TEXT.) 2. WE HAVE NOW HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO 7929 MEET WITH TIMERMAN'S LAWYER, GENARIO CARRIO WHO SPOKE TO US IN CONFIDENCE. 3. THOUGH HE HAS NOT SEEN THE SUPREME COURT DECISION ON TIMERMAN, CARRIO FEELS PRESS REPORTS ABOUT IT ARE PROBABLY CORRECT, AT LEAST SO FAR AS ITS MAJOR THRUST-- THE JUNTA HAS BEEN TOLD BY THE COURT THAT THE CONTINUED DETENTION OF TIMERMAN IS ILLEGAL. MOREOVER, CARRIO BELIEVES THAT IN SHORT ORDER--PROBABLY THIS WEEK-- TIMERMAN WILL PROBABLY BE STRIPPED OF HIS CITIZENSHIP AND EXPELLED FROM THE COUNTRY BY THE JUNTA WHICH WILL TAKE THESE STEPS UNDER THE POWERS IT CONFERRED ON ITSELF WITH THE INSTITUTIONAL ACT OF 1976. DRAFTED POL:TB RIEDMAN' DRAFTING DATE 9/25/79 TEL MU 277 CONTENTS AND CLASSIFICATION POLCOUNS:WHHALLMAN ROVED BY CLEARANC S0153-101 DCM:MCHP.PLIN CONFIDENTIAL cummmovrioN Approved for Release: 2018/10/01 006626785 OPTIONAL FORM 153 (Formerly FS-413) January 1375 Dept of State Approved for Release: 2018/10/01 C06626785 CONFIDENTIAL peg. 2 a -5 :VIC9? Closed:cation � � -1 4. CARRIO STATED TO US THAT HIS PRESENTATION TO IN TIMERMAN'S BEHALF THE COURT/(HAD TWO THRUSTS: 50152-201 A) THAT TIMERMAN'S DETENTION UNDER THE INSTITUTIONAL ACT IS ILLEGAL; AND B) THAT THE INSTITUTIONAL ACT IN ITSELF IS UNCONSTI- 5. TUTIONAL. / HE BELIEVES THAT IN ORDERING TIMERMAN FREED THE COURT PROBABLY DEALT WITH THE FIRST OF THESE ARGUMENTS, BECAUSE TO DECLARE THE INSTITUTIONAL ACT ITSELF UNCONSTITUTIONAL WOULD OPEN UP A PANDORA'S BOX FOR THE JUNTA, AFFECTING AS IT WOULD THE MANY PEOPLE BEING HELD OR WHO HAVE BEEN PUNISHED UNDER THE INSTITUTIONAL ACT. (6. THE BASIC ARGUMENT HE USED TO ATTACK THE LEGALITY, AS OPPOSED TO ITS CONSTITUTIONALITY, OF TIMERMAN'S DETENTION WAS NARROWLY AIMED AT PARAGRAPH (E) OF ARTICLE TWO OF THE ACT WHICH STATES THAT AMONG THE MEASURES THAT CAN BE APPLIED TO THOSE BEING PUNISHED UNDER THE BILL IS "DETENTION IN A PLACE DETERMINED BY THE EXECUTIVE POWER FOR SO LONG AS THE INDIVIDUAL REMAINS AT THE DISPOSITION OF THE EXECUTIVE POWER...." THE ARGUMENT OF THE DEFENSE WAS THAT SINCE TIMERMAN'S DETENTION UNDER THE EXECUTIVE POWER HAS BEEN RULED ILLEGAL (BY THE COURT LAST YEAR) AND HE IS NO LONGER AT THE DISPOSITION OF THE EXECUTIVE, HE CAN NO LONGER BE HELD UNDER THE INSTITUTIONAL ACT. CONFIDENTIAL Clasathcation Approved for Release: 2018/10/01 C06626785 OPTIONAL FORM 152.00 (Formerly FS-413(We) January 1976 Dept of State I 50152-201 Approved for Release: 2018/10/01 C06626785 CONFIDENTIAL 3 Pelle Classification OTHER THAN RELEASING TIMERMAN, THE JUNTA HAS TWO OTHER OPTIONS: ONE, TO IGNORE THE COURT ORDER; TWO, TO PLACE HIM BACK UNDER PEN. CARRIO ASSERTED THAT NEITHER OF THESE OPTIONS WAS LIKELY--THE FIRST "BECAUSE IT WOULD BE ILLEGAL" AND THE SECOND BECAUSE "IT WOULD MAKE THEM LOOK RIDICULOUS TO THE WORLD." CASTRO il/e\ CONFIDENTIAL Classification Approved for Release: 2018/10/01 C06626785 OPTIONAL FORM 152a(H) (Formerly FS413(1-)a) January 1975 Dept of State