RE: NY TIMES QUESTION ON REFERRALS TO JUSTICE

• Document Type: FOIA
• Collection: FOIA Collection
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 05834205
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: March 9, 2023
• Document Release Date: August 24, 2020
• Case Number: F-2008-01525
• Publication Date: October 11, 2005

Approved for Release: 2020/08/19 C05834205
UNCLASSIFIED/ / A.IL7
Special Agent
Office of Inspector General
(b)(3)
10/11/2005 10:23 AM
To:
cc:
0000472 �
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
Subject: Re: NY Times Question on Referrals to JusticeEl
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
(b)(7)(f)
Original Text o
DCl/OIG
10/11/2005 08:26 AM
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
To:
cc:
Subject: NY Times Question on Referrals to Justice
Can each of you add up the names of those referred if any on your groups or cases that would lead to
names and give them to me today? Thanks.
Forwarded by
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
10/11/05 08:03 AM
To:
UNCLASSIFIED/ /AIUO
Approved for Release: 2020/08/19 C05834205
n 10/11/05 08:25 AM
Approved for Release: 2020/08/19 C05834205
UNCLASSIFIED/ /AIU
cc:
Subject: NY Times Question on Referrals to Justice
'm sending this to you in absence. We always get the fun questions here in Public Affairs,
don't we? I'm not sure this is the kind of thing we'd wade into anyway, but it always helps to know the
facts. ..and what the reporters know (or have heard). A thousand thanks.
(b)(3)
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
P.S. I think the IG was out for part of this week. But I'll be happy to reach out to him, too. Thanks again.
Forwarded by
(b)(3)
on 10/11/0508:01 AM
(b)(6)
(b)(7)(c)
10/07/05, 06:21 PM
To:
cc:
Subject: NY Times Question on Referrals to Justice
This is probably more FYI than anything else. A NY Times reporter called today to say that he's
heard that CIA had referred eight people (staff employees and contractors) to Justice for possible
prosecution in relation to detainee abuse cases, and that Justice had declined to prosecute. He'd also
heard that the IC Report on detention activities had been completed in summer 04 and that it found--or
asserted--that some detention activities were not authorized. The reporter closed by noting that there
were people inside and outside the building who disagreed with that conclusion. As a source, he cited
"former government officials."
He didn't say that he was about to publish anything.. .yet. But he'll be back. If there's any light that can be
shed, please let me know. I'm on(b)(3) Thanks.
UNCLASSIFIED/
Approved for Release: 2020/08/19 C05834205