CHIGOE

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
05751067
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
3
Document Creation Date: 
March 9, 2023
Document Release Date: 
February 10, 2021
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2011-01575
Publication Date: 
February 15, 1966
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CHIGOE[15863400].pdf144.13 KB
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2021/01/11 C05751067 Vg 0. 15 February 1966 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: CHIGOE 1. During brief meeting with a. Funding: Interim funding document to come 16 February 1966. Formal transfer will be initiated now and take whatever time the paperwork and necessary approvals require. The entire aOdount (for the total LTV contract) is to be transferred at this time. b. Status of associate primes: 1. Dalmo Victor - under contract 2. Texas Instruments - under contract (b)(3) 3 Varian Associates - no contract yet. Bill wait- ing until 18 February 1966 to make decision regarding magnetometer. Understood no proposal received from contractor. Aircraft recondition and ferry Discuss at meeting 16 d. Microfilm February 1966 procurement through Cmdr. (b)(3) initiated Dick Warren (0/L - Ext. 3696) 15 February 1966. In the meantime, = (D/M, OSA) inquiring (fur- (b)(3) into possibility of a loan. NAVY source nished by Dave Lane, LTV) is: Mr. Essnan (Phila., Pa.) (b)(3) 01 Cmdr. Rich (Phila., Pa.) (b)(3) Approved for Release: 2021/01/11 C05751067 e. Approved for Release: 2021/01/11 C05751067 WidiP Source and procurement route to be resolved 16 February 1966. If obtained from the above source it will involve repreduction of some 80K IBM cards, and cost in the neighborhood of 83,000, plus whatever time reproduction will require. indicates the existing (am) link can probably be used for CHIGOE. Will have the individual identified by Monday 21 February, who will go down to Greenville and brief and intro- duce contractor's commo type to CHIGOE program. However, when this can happen will depend on time it takes to clear the contractor's people. Jean indicated maybe three weeks or about 6 March 1966. f. Mailing Address furnished the following mailing address for LTV: K.L. Williams P.O. Box 490 Greenville, Tex. 2 Approved for Release: 2021/01/11 C05751067 (b)(3) (b)(3) (b)(3) nnArm Approved for Release: 2021/01/11 C0575106706 15 February 1966 MEMO FOR. THE RECORD SUBJECT: Project CHIGOE 1. In late December 1965, a number of selected members of OSA attended an initial briefing on Project CHIGOE in the (b)(3) OSA Control Center given jointly by Bill Seward and OSA Contracts was represented by Messrs. *(b)(3) 2. At this time it was understood that a competition existed between two prime contractors, LAC and LTV, but only the LTV proposal had been received; The LAC proposal was due approximately mid-January. 3. Shortly after the LAC proposal was received, members of Kelly Johnson's organization discussed the with both organizatiorIxand later briefly contracts personnel in Mr. and (b)(3)' When left, he took the LAC proposal with h nim to review. Mr. Mangis indicated a desire to participate in the of the two proposals. three proposal with OSA At that time evaluation (b)(3) (b)(3) (b)(3) (b)(3) (b)(3) 4. On 7 February 1966 briefed and(b)(3) and in office on the results of (b)(3) the evaluation he had made and .0)(4d that LTV was selected over LAC, and that Dr. Wheelon had been briefed on 4 February 1966 and had approved the selection. Award was explained to be based on both cost and technical advantage of LTV over LAC. Cost dif- ference was in the range of approximately $i million. Dr. Brewer also pointed out the effect of the 25% ceiling in the LAC pro- posal, whereas LTV had proposed FFP. On the other hand, the LTV proposal contained as Phase I a FFP element of roughly $30K for study, analysis and design of the entire system. On completion of Phase I, it is understood that a new, firm F.P. proposal for Phase II would result. Accordingly, until this new firm proposal for Phase II is presented, it will not be known exactly what comparison may exist in the two (LAC & LTV) proposals for the total system. Approved for Release: 2021/01/11 C05751067 (b)(3)