EL SALVADOR: EVALUATION OF GOVERNMENT MILITARY OPERATIONS IN THE GUAZAPA VOLCANO AREA
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
05362221
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
12
Document Creation Date:
March 9, 2023
Document Release Date:
April 27, 2021
Sequence Number:
Case Number:
F-2017-00184
Publication Date:
November 1, 1983
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
EL SALVADOR EVALUATION O[15910343].pdf | 504.45 KB |
Body:
II I I I
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
r / /
Directorate of , /
v
Intelligence
-Sterol_
0,2
El Salvador: Evaluation of
Government Military
Operations in the
Guazapa Volcano Area
--Sftret-
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
IA 83-10120
November 1983
Copy
24
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Warning Notice
Intelligence Sources
or Methods Involved
(WNINTEL)
National Security Unauthorized Disclosure
Information Subject to Criminal Sanctions
Dissemination Control
Abbreviations
NOFORN (NF) Not releasable to foreign nationals
NOCONTRACT (NC) Not releasable to contractors or contractor/consultants
PROPIN (PR) Caution�proprietary information involved
ORCON (OC) Dissemination and extraction of information
controlled by originator
REL...
FGI
WN
This information has been authorized for release to...
Foreign government information
WNINTEL�Intelligence sources or methods involved
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
. --
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
--SWIrk-
El Salvador: Evaluation of Government
Military Operations in the Guazapa
Volcano Area
Summary
the Guazapa Volcano area of El Salvador
as of late August 1983, the El Salvadoran armed
forces had successfully driven most of the insurgents out of
their previously secure base area. All of the insurgent camps
and defensive positions within this area have been abandoned or
are occupied by government troops.
It appears that the present government commander of the Guazapa
area, Col. Blandon, will continue to keep pressure on the insur-
gents and prevent them from reestablishing a major base in this
area. The insurgents will, however, probably be able to continue
to maintain a presence in the Guazapa area by using small, more
mobile units to conduct ambushes and other operations.
Information available as of 8 September 1983 was used in this
report.
The author of this paper is Office of Imagery
Analysis. Comments and queries are welcome and may be directed
totheChieL.Third World Forces Division, 01 A, on
-SeelFOL
1.4 83-10120
(b)(3)
- -Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221_
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Introduction
Since at least early 1981 until February 1983, insurgents con-
trolled a base area near the Guazapa Volcano in north-central El
Salvador. As of January 1983, this base area occupied about 130
square kilometers (figure 1). The insurgents used this strategic
base for launching operations, troop housing and training,
storing arms and other supplies, raising food, and as a safe
haven for insurgents escaping from government operations in other
areas.
The Guazapa base area contained at least five major insurgent
base camps and seven other major defensive areas (tables 1 and
2). Small camps for mobile units probably also existed
The insurgents con-
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
trolled access to the base area by digging trenches across the
major roads leading into the area and by manning defensive posi-
tions that controlled the roads and trails near each base camp.
armed
combatants from the five factions of the Farabundo Marti National
Liberation Front (FMLN) were based in the Guazapa base area prior
to February 1983. [Reference 1] About 700 of these were from
the Armed Forces of National Resistance (FARN), and there were
about 200 each from the Popular Liberation Forces (FPL), the
Peoples Revolutionary Army (ERP), the Armed Forces of Liberation
(FAL), and the Central American Workers Revolutionary Party
(PRTC). The actual number of combatants in the area probably
fluctuated considerably depending on the level of military activ-
ity in other parts of the country--decreasing when insurgents
from Guazapa supported operations in other areas, and increasing
when government operations forced insurgents from other areas to
seek safety there.
Discussion
The El Salvadoran armed forces (ESAF) have maintained pressure on
the insurgents in the Guazapa Volcano area with near-continuous
operations since late February 1983. This continous application
1
-SVCret--
IA 83-10120
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
_Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
II i
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
I I
Figure 1
Guazapa Volcano Base Area, Coscatcan Department, San Salvador
2
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
of offensive offensive pressure contrasts with previous practices., As of
late August these operations had been successful in keeping the
insurgents off balance. the (W(1)
insurgents have been graaually driven out of their Guazapa base
area and, as of late June, were moving generally east of the base
area. [2] This has reduced the immediate threat of attack on the
capital of San Salvador, which is about 25 kilometers south of
the Guazapa area. There is no evidence that the insurgents have
established permanent base camps to replace those abandoned in
the Guazapa base area. I (b)(3)
During the period of August 1982 to February 1983, there was only
one significant government operation in the Guazapa area. That
operation, conducted by the Ramon Belloso Battalion on the east
slopes of the Guazapa Volcano, was successful in making contact
with the insurgents, but it failed to produce any lasting
results. Beginning in late February 1983, ESAF units, including
the First Brigade and the Atlacatl Immediate Reaction Battalion,
conducted a series of operations--Operation "Guazapa X" in late
February; a series of three smaller operations called "Salitre"
in April, May, and early June; and another large operation called
"Guazapa XI" in July. Since July the ESAF has launched at least
two other operations against the insurgents--one on the southern
edge of the base area, and another to the east of the base area.
These operations were conducted in the areas where two new insu(b)(1)
gent camps had been established between mid-April and late July'
(table 1). I (b)(3)
Tney were alsmantiea auring tne operations. [3] Apparently the
insurgents had received advance warning of the operations from
members of the International Red Cross and relocated to
Chalatenango and San Vicente Departments to avoid contact. [4]
As of late August 1983, government forces occupied the former
insurgent defensive positions at Cerro Pena Colorada and Cerro
Los Ganchos. They also continue to maintain a force at a govern-
lOne of the major reasons for the recent ESAF success in the
Guazapa area apparently has been the leadership of Col.
Blandon. Since becoming commander of the First Infantry Brigade
in late 1982, Col. Blandon has shown no signs of backing off from
the aggressive tactics he has used in the Guazapa area. Blandon
does not appear to be satisfied with driving the insurgents out
of their base areas, and he has not removed the government forces
when a military operation has been completed.
3 -Seetet-
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
ment base at El Roblar. These positions are strategically lo-
cated overlooking many important areas, including the major
north-south and east-west roads and five abandoned insurgent
camps. The ESAF should be able to prevent the insurgents from
reestablishing this base area by maintaining these positions and
patrolling the surrounding countryside. The First Brigade has
left a permanent force of two companies in the vicinity of
Tenancingo and a force of three companies on the Guazapa Volcano.
These troops are to carry out pacification efforts in the area
and provide security for the local populace.
Although the insurgent base camps have been neutralized and the
ESAF has garrisoned troops in the Guazapa area, the insurgents
probably will still be able to maintain a presence of small,
mobile units. These units probably will conduct ambushes and
other limited operations against the ESAF and against vulnerable
economic targets, such as bridges. The Guazapa area can be paci-
fied only after the campesinos, who were driven out by the insur-
gents, return to their homes and the ESAF gains their trust and
confidence.
- Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
"Seeret-_
Table 1
Abandoned Insurgent Camps In and Near the Guazapa Volcano Base Area
Name
Mirandilla
0 13-55-30N 89-06-15W
Remarks
Established prior to mid-January
1982. It consisted of 11 buildings,
five defensive trenches, six foxholes,
and four observation posts.
La Presa
13-55-20N 89-03-35W
Established prior to February 1982.
It consisted of a housing area,
and at least one defen-
sive trench.
El Platanar
13-56-25N 89-03-45W
Established prior to February 1982. It
onsise of a housing area,
and two defensive trenches.
Concepcion Chaparral
13-57-00N 89-03-05W
Established prior to February 1982. It
consisted of a housing area and at least
two defensive trenches.
Palo Grande
13-55-40N 89-04-20W
Established prior to September 1982. It
consisted of a housing area
Tenangoa
13-51-55N 89-00-45W
Established between mid-April and late
July 1983. It consisted of one defen-
sive trench, 15 foxholes, one bunker,
and a housing area. This camp was
dismantled
by government troops in late August
1983.
Los Liriosa
13-52-20N 89-06-50W
Established between mid-April and late
July 1983.
This camp was
clismanded by government
troops in late August 1983.
aCamps that were established
outside the base area after the
government operations began.
5 �Secret-
th1/11
(b)(1)
(h)(1)
(b)(1)
(b)(1)
TA 1)
(b)(3)
rT Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221-
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
�Secret_
Table 2
Areas of Defensive Positions in the Guazapa Volcano Base Area
Name
Cerro Los Ganchos
13-54-45N 89-06-20W
Remarks
Established prior to February 1982. It
consisted of two defensive trenches and
two observation posts. As of late Aug-
ust 1983, it was occupied by government
troops.
Cerro Pena Colorada
13-53-40N 89-05-30W
Established prior to February 1982. It
consisted of three defensive trenches
and one observation post. As of late
August 1983, it was occupied by govern-
ment troops.
Los Gramales
13-55-00N 89-04-00W
Established prior to February 1982. It
consisted of at least two defensive
positions. As of late August 1983, it
was abandoned.
Hacienda Seretal
13-58-00N 89-03-00W
Established prior to February 1982. It
consisted of one defensive trench and
one foxhole. As of late August 1983, it
was abandoned.
Hacienda El Bario
13-57-20N 89-03-10W
Established prior to April 1983. It
consisted of at least one defensive
position. As of late August 1983, it
was abandoned.
Consolac ion
13-59-00N 89-05-00W
Established prior to February 1982. It
consisted of one defensive trench and
two foxholes. As of late August 1983,
it was abandoned.
Buena Vista
13-56-25N 89-07-00W
Established prior to September 1982. It
consisted of three defensive positions.
As of late August 1983, it was aban-
doned.
�Sticret--
6
- - Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
IH I
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
References
Documents
Document references are available upon request.
7
�Seent�
_ Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
I
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
�Seecet_
pproved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221
Approved for Release: 2021/04/27 C05362221