DAILY SUMMARY - 1946/03/14

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
03164654
Release Decision: 
Original Classification: 
Document Page Count: 
Document Creation Date: 
September 11, 2018
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Daily Summary #24[15493733].pdf1.06 MB
Body: 
Approved for Release: 2018/09/05 C03164654 APPROVED FOR RELEASE - Historical Programs Staff 30 August 2018 171�4174- EUROPE-AFRICA 1. USSR: Comments on Izvestia attack on Churchill�In commenting on tht 12 March attack on Churchill's speech in Izvestia (by Soviet historian Tarle), the US Military Attache in Moscow states that (a) the Soviets undoubtedly feel that they are too deeply committed in Iran to with- draw, and (b) the emphasis on Britain's aversion to war is less significant than the assertion that "in any case [Britain] cannot go to war within five years." The US Charge in Moscow concurs in the above - comments and, in addition, cites the contrast made by Tarle between the "invariably friendly" tradition of US- Soviet relations and the conflicts provoked by British aggression in past US-British relations. He considers this the strongest example to date of the different treat- ment currently accorded the US and Britain in the Soviet press. (Top Secret) Ui5 re:I-Rests modification of censorshlp pcedure-- Charge Kerman in Moscow has reported that the new form of Soviet censorship permits complete distortion of press dispatches without the correspondent's knowledge. After discussing the matter with US Press Bureau Chiefs, the State Department has directed Kennan to request that censorship be held to a minimum and that correspondents be permitted to discuss deletions with the censors. If Kennan's representations should fail and the Soviets should refuse at least to return to the system which prevailed before censorship functions were transferred to the Soviet Post Office, the US press will publicize the "blind censor- ship" in order to protect the reading public. (Confidential) 2. AUSTRIA: Soviet "repatriation" missions �General Clark reports that the Soviet Command is "using every device" to prolong the stay of its repatriation mission in the US zone. Clark states that (a) the mission has had ample time � " Document No. 24 Nr.O CHANGE in Class. fl , DECLASSIFI7D 7.ads. Canc.= TO: TS S DDA Memo, 4 Apr 77 Auth: DiA 77f171 Date: 9,MJRy: _Off Approved for Release: 2018/09/05 C03164654 Approved for Release: 2018/09/05 C03164654 APPROVED FOR RELEASE - Historical Programs Staff 30 August 2018 Tqlquiffrfry5tivri4 u.1 to complete its work, (b) he has already granted it two extensions of time, and (c) intelligence and espionage work in the US zone represent "no small part' of its activities. Clark adds that IVIcCreery and Bethouart, commanding the British and French zones, are experi- encing the same difficulties with the Soviet repatriation missions in their areas. Clark asks that he be authorized to require the Soviet mission to withdraw by 1 April, and thereafter to allow any new mission to reenter only for, a limited time and for a specific purpose based on such neW and concrete evidence regarding repatriation as may be submitted by Marshal Konev. (Top Secret) 3, FRANCE: Bidault's concern over effects of Soviet wheat offer�In connection with the recent Soviet offer of 500,000 tons of wheat to France, Embassy Paris reports that Bidault is greatly concerned over its pos- sible effect on internal politics. Coming as it does on top of the prompt Soviet agreement to submit the Spanish question to the Security Council, he believes the Communists will capitalize on it in the coming elections. Bidault stated that he had little faith in the "sincerity" of the offer, but that for "obvious reasons" the French Government must act as if they believed the Soviets were wholly sincere. (Top Secret) IRAN: Soviet intentigns�Ambassador Murray reports that the Shah is torn by doubts of Premier Qavam's loyalty and is apprehensive of a Soviet blitzkrieg sweep- ing through the whole Near East before the UNO or the western powers could act to block it. Murray adds that the Soviets may be deploying their troops in Iran so as to surround Tehran from the west, north and east. Embassy Moscow believes that Soviet troops are In Iran to obtain Soviet objectives by intimidation if possible, but by force if Lecessary. Soviet leaders car 1 3,./ � I 4 A TIA Approved for Release: 2018/09/05 C03164654 Approved for Release: 2018/09/05 C03164654 APPROVED FOR RELEASE - Historical Programs Staff 30 August 2018 774L! believe that neitherthe US nor the British are prepared to put up military resistance, and they expect to gain their objectives before the UNO can take action. (Top Secret) FAR EAST 6. CHINA: Chinese Com_mmiggle_messimpAgguipment-- General Marshall, the National Government and the Com- munists have agreed that the US� should furnish some equipment and basic training to those Communist units that are to be integrated into the Chinese National Army. This agreement was made because the Communists feel that their troops are not on an equal status with the National- ists and thus "would not be accepted without prejudice." (Top Secret) THE AMERICAS 6. ARGENTINA: Naval aviation gyslitilts.i_Lee12.to visit US-- The US Charge in Buenos Aires reports that the Argentine General Staff has requested US permission to send a group of naval officers to the US for the purpose of "bringing up to date" Argentine infornmtion on naval aviation. The Charge recommends that this request be granted, partic- ularly since the Argentine Navy took a leading part in obtaining fair elections. However, the Charge suggests that any purchases of equipment by Argentina should await that country's fulfillment of pledges regarding Nazi elements. (Secret) Approved for Release: 2018/09/05 C03164654
Daily Summary Collection Type: