CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN - 1959/11/21

Document Type: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
03148923
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
8
Document Creation Date: 
February 25, 2020
Document Release Date: 
February 27, 2020
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
November 21, 1959
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE BULL[15787663].pdf286.42 KB
Body: 
,j717,1 v/r rfi ZrZZ/ZZZZ/r/Z/Z/1 Approved for Release. 2020/02/21 C03148923 ---Palij-5rEeRET OWNER U. �(4 KO CRANK IN cuss. )01( o DECULISIrlis KLASS. tri*Ktio 13s 17.01,14.004_ Orr 0A/�1 KOMI 10104 ,OATIP JUN 198Ouviimps 21 November 1959 1 3.3(h)(2 Copy No. C 65 3.5(c)-r CENTRAL IYTELLIGENCE BULLETIN- Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923/7"/M/MMZ// Approved for Release: 2020/02121C03148923 Noe' , - Tel Mb Ir".110'7" Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 21 NOVEMBER 1959 I. THE COMMUNIST BLOC USSR rejects latest Iranian counterpro- posal which repeated Shah's offer to ex- clude missile bases. II. ASIA-AFRICA Algerian rebels name five officials im- prisoned in France to discuss guaran- tees for self-determination. LATE ITEM ICBM launched at Tyura Tam, Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 3-1 Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 vitts0 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE BULLETIN o� 21 November 1959 DAILY BRIEF I. THE COMMUNIST BLOC USSR-Iran: The Soviet Government, which has been pressing Iran to exchange guarantees prohibiting all foreign military bases on their territories, has rejected Tehran's counterproposal, The draft protocol pro- posed by Tehran was limited to the Shah's original /offer to exclude "medium- and long-range" foreign missile bases and was turned down because it did not preclude other types of mil- itary bases in Iran. Foreign Minister Gromyko was described as "very severe and angry" over the meeting of CENTO regional leaders in Tehran. The Shah appears firm in refusing to expand his original offer. Soviet leaders probably feel, however, that he can be induced to accept some compromise agreement which the USSR could subsequently use in exerting pressure against any further development of Iran's military ties with the West. IL ASIA-AFRICA Algeria-France: Action by the Algerian rebels in em- powering five leaders imprisoned in France to discuss guar- antees for self-determination is in response to De Gaulle's repeated urgings that the rebels send truce emissaries to Paris. The rebels' move reflects their distrust concerning the protocol treatment which might be accorded a delegation sent from Tunis, and their desire to avoid any appearance of capitulation. The action was probably also taken with an eye to its propaganda value prior to the UN debate expected in early 9Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923' Z6W//,',/7.6%/VX/E/MOYA,M977/27////.77 Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 , A NS' A 11.-, g % La A 4.04 December on the Algerian problem. The rebels are unlikely � to undertake cease-fire negotiations prior to the UN debate. *De Gaulle probably wants to clarify his self-determination proposal before the UN acts, but his reluctance to accept these rebel emissaries underscores his unwillingness to undertake talks which would be construed as political negotiations rather than a military cease-fire discussion. (Page 1) LATE ITEM *USSR: A Soviet ICBM test vehicle was launched from Tyura Tam at approximately 1606:16 EST on 20 November after a smooth countdown with no delays. Successful flight of the vehicle to the Kamchatka impact area, 3,500 nautical miles down-range, The latest firing is believed to be the nineteenth successful ICBM test vehicle launched on the Tyura Tam Missile Test Range. 21 Nov 59 DAILY BRIEF ii TOP SECRET AApproved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923, Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 I. THE COMMUNIST BLOC IL ASIA-AFRICA Algerian Rebels Name Cease-Fire Negotiators The Algerian rebels nave responded to De Gaulle's re- iterated Lutxestion that they send truce emi,saries to Paris by emp,:.)w.-,,,ring five leaders imprisoned in France to diocuis guarar.tee6 fur self-determination. The prisoners include the rebels deputy premier, Mohamed ben Zelda, who was captured in 1950 when the French Air Force caused the air- liner in which he was traveling from Rabat to Tunis to land in Algiers. The naming of the imprisoned leaders reflects rebel dis- trust regarding the treatment which might be accorded a del- egation sent from Tunis. The rebels have been reluctant to go to Paris, fearing they might be required to meet with low-level French military officers rather than a high-level representa- tive of De Gaulle. Moreover, the appointment of prisoners as negotiators serves to avoid any appearance of capitulation, while underscoring the rebel desire for a settlement. The rebels, how- ever, may expect no substantive negotiations until after the UN debate on Algeria, probably early in December. They probably hope for a resolution favoring a negotiated settlement which would strengthen their bargaining position. De Gaulle wants to avoid any implication that an Algerian settlement is subject to outside pressure. In his 16 September and 10 November statements, De Gaulle committed France to a broad program which gives him freedom to discuss the polit- ical future of Algeria with the rebels. De Gaulle would be willing to discuss "all aspects" of the rebels' future now, but cautions that he would be "unable" to do so after a UN debate, particu- larly if the Algerians came bearing a UN resolution calling for negotiations. CONFIDENTIAL 21 Nov 59 CENTRAL INTELLIC;FNCF RIB I FTIN Page 1 Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 003148923 Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 . aa.r.a.� � l� Soo' wis0 THE PRESIDENT The Vice President Executive Offices of the White House Special Assistant for National Security Affairs Scientific Adviser to the President Director of the Budget Director, Office of Defense and Civilian Mobilization Director, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Special Assistant for Security Operations Coordination Chairman, Board of Consultants on Foreign Intelligence Activities Special Assistant for Foreign Economic Policy Executive Secretary, National Security Council The Treasury Department The Secretary of the Treasury The Department of State The Secretary of State The Uncier Secretary of State The Under Secretary of State for Economic Affairs The Deputy Under Secretary for Political Affairs The Deputy Under Secretary for Administration The Counselor Director, International Cooperation Administration The Director of Intelligence and Research The Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense The Deputy Secretary of Defense Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs The Secretary of the Army The Secretary of the Navy The Secretary of the Air Force The Chairman, The Joint Chiefs of Staff Commandant, United States Marine Corps The Director, The Joint Staff Chief of Staff, United States Army Chief of Naval Operations, United States Navy Chief of Staff, United States Air Force Assistant to Secretary of Defense for Special Operations Director for Intelligence, The Joint Staff Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of Army Director of Naval Intelligence, Department of Navy Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Department of the Air Force Supreme Allied Commander, Europe Commander in Chief, Pacific The Department of Commerce The Secretary of Commerce Federal Bureau of Investigation The Director Atomic Energy Commission The Chairman National Security Agency The Director National Indications Center The Director riruttrrnrialrry Approved for Release: 2020/02/21 C03148923 rVZZZZZZ