SOVIET EXPLOITATION OF THE BALTIC COUNTRIES

• Document Type: FOIA
• Collection: FOIA Collection
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 02720023
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 3
• Document Creation Date: March 8, 2023
• Document Release Date: August 13, 2019
• Case Number: F-2018-00127
• Publication Date: August 13, 1952

Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2720023
CLASSIFICATIONC017 IAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY REPORT NO.
INFORMATION REPORT CD NO.
COUNTRY USSR/Lithuania/Latvia/Estonia
SUBJECT Soviet Exploitation of the Baltic Countries
PLACE
ACQUIRED - iNt I= f=k
DATE
ACQUIRED BY SOURCE Late Jun 52
DATE OF INFORMATION
Jun 52
THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE
OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE ACT 50'
U. S. C.. 91 AND 92, AS AMENDED. ITS TRANSMISSION OR THE REVELATION
OF ITS CONTENTS IM ANY MANNER TO AN UNAUTHORIZED PERSON IS PRO-
HIBITED BY LAW. REPRODUCTION OF THIS FORM IS PROHIBITED.
SOURCE
DATE DISTR. / 3 Au? 1952
NO. OF PAGES 3
NO. OF ENCLS.
(LISTED BELOW)
SUPPLEMENT TO
REPORT NO.
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
THIS IS UNEVALUATED INFORMATION
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
1. "Baltic complaints of Soviet oppression recently submitted to the UN are tragic-
ally confirmed by the USSR s own publications. Analysis of the budgets and plan
reports of the three Baltic republics and of such copies of their Communist press
as have become available abroad, shays that the Baits are suffering a harsher
fate than the Soviets themselves. The twenty years of national independence
they enjoyed in the inter-war period seem to have enhanced their martyrdom.
Since the re-incorporation of the Baltic countries, the Bolsheviks who resent
the contrast between the monotondus poverty of the present-day Soviet Union and
the variegated pattern of the more developed countries on their periphery, have
tried to wipe out every vestige of Western influence and to assimilate the
Baits by telescoping thirty years of Communist tyranny into three.
2. "The three Baltic countries, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia, ',;ogether nearly the
size of Missouri with nearly 2,000,000 more inhabitants, �are being tyrannized
politically, economically, and financially. Bolshevik political tyranny, accord-
ing to Baltic spokesmen abroad, has led to the deportation of at least 1,000,000
people into the interior of the Soviet empire. On 8 Apr 52, by decree of
the Supreme Soviet in Moscow, Estonia and Latvia were subdivided into provinces
in accordance with the Soviet model. Each of these provinces now has its own
bureaucratic party and police'organization, which adds some 10,000 more parasi-
tical officials to the ranks of an already oversized administration. Russian
names are more and more in evidence. The majority of the Baltic members of the
governments are Soviet-reared. Now, according to the Moscow press, dictionaries
are being re-written with a view to expanding the large influence of Russian on
the three national languages.
CLASSIFICATIONCONF IAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION
(b)(3)
STATE
NAVY
NSRB
DISTRIBUTION
ARMY
MR
FBI
MR EV
pproved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2720023
Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2720023
CONFIDENTIAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION
(b)(3)
- 2 -
3. "Economically the once well-to-do Baltic peasants seem to be worse off than their
Soviet neighbors. On 6 Jun, 52 Lithuania's rural populationvmore than three
quarters of the totalllareported to Tear Comrade Stalin' Am .1951 year the cattle .
herd of the collective farms increased by 61.9% over 1950. Since this is be-
tween four and five times the normal growth, most of the private cattle of the kol-
khozniksy-one cow per household-must have been collectivized. In other parts of the
USSR where a similar process of expropriation is going on, the cattle herd of the col-
lectives usually increased by less than 200-.
4. "Latvia's plan report for 1951 boasted that the peasants had delivered two and a half
times more wheat to the state than they sold in the market prior to collectivization;
in other words, that the countryside today consumes much less good bread than in former
times. The fact that wheat production has been expanded at the expense of other cul-
tures cannot have had so great an influence.
5. "According to Raahva Haall the leading Estonian Communist newspaper, last year's annual
share of a member of one of the most 'advanced' collective farms in the money income
ofthid tolkhoze can be computed at rubles 40o, or about six per cest bf the ahmual earm-
ings of the average Soviet worker. From the kolkhoze harvest each peasant further re-
ceived approximately 240 lbs of rye and the same quantity of potatoes. Then there is
the small additional income from the produce of the kolkhoznik's small one-acre home-
stead economy, part of which has to be sold in the market to buy clothing, footwear,
and other indispensable manufactured goods, while the major part goes for taxes. Cal-
culated on this basis, the average Estonian peasant's gross income is but a fraction of
what it was before Wort War .TAL 'the USSR; an .pieL other 'hand, Bolshevik
No 10 calculated recently that the average peasant's real income was 3olo above
1940.
6. "Industrial workers are not much better off. rim. .953_ umskillt*--#0fter
Lithuania is reported to have earned rubles 300 a month which is less than half of what
most students: of Soviet affaira believe to be the Soviet average wage. Even a skilled
worker'a earnings were below the overall average. In Latvia and. Estonia too workers
are reported to earn less than in the Soviet Union.
7. "While living standards in towns and country have declined sharply, official plan re-
ports for 1951 register a large increase in industrial prodnction for each of the three
republics. More specific data shows that the output of the Baltic industries, once re-
nowned for their accuracy, reflects the miserable living conditions of the population.
Thus we read in Raahva Haal that Vladimir StolboV, Estonia's Minister of Light Industry,
complained earlier 'la 1952 that the ,totatry!a latzeit textile 'works turmed out
064*Ai40-Aiudh poor quality that they were useless and entailed losses of many mil-
lions of rubles. Minister of Trade, Rudolf Vester, publicly displayed socks and stock-
ings of unequal size and one pair of rubbers, one rubber with a broad, the other one
with a narrow heel. Minister of Local Industries, Nikolai Nrylov, stated that produc-
tion of essential building materials was far off schedule and, apparently, below 1950.
In order to make a good showing on paper, industrial cooperatives doubled the price of
their, products and then declared that they had doubled their production. In Latvia
the leading Communist newspaper, Cina, reported that in Riga, where three quarters of
the country's industries are concentrated, the principal shipyard and the largest
electrotechnical factory were seriously behind quota. Conditions were especially bad
in�the food industry. Slaughter houses, for instance: supplied less than half the meat
they were supposed to turn out. In Lithuania, where the Vilna newspaper Tiesa pub-
lished a detailed report on plan fulfillment during the first quarter (cif 1952,,
IRitt6r:vrod.uctAolk:,-mfts--72.304 off: Ede, 2tome iteftwo;rauidigellssms1 v
buckets for farms, the plan was fulfilled only to 16%. While this seems to be ,
an exceptionally poor showing, it is characteristic of the unevenness with which pro-
grams are carried out.
"This travesty of a planned industrial production at wages far below the overall Soviet
average yields substantial profits for Moscow. The full measureiof the financial ex-
plbitation of the Baltic countries ip revealed by an amalyAis of the Lithuamian budget
hwhich balanced at rubles 1,471,000,000. The country's total tax receipts, including
CONFIDENTIAL/US OFFICIALS ONLY/SECURITY INAMDINTION
pproved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2720023
Approved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2720023
CONFIDENTIAL/US OFFICIALS ONW/
'SECURITY INFORMATION
-3-.
(b)(3)
profits-from, state industries, are to yteld rubles 3,918,,000�000. The balance of
roughly rubles 2,500,000,000 represents the share of the central government of the USSR,
of which only one-thini is returned to Lithuania. In. tie case of the other two Baltic
countries, the contribution of the USSR to the republican budget is much smaller. Yet
the .USSR always receives the lions share 9f all taxes and profits. Soviet financial
experts maintain that a large part of these amounts is reinvested by the various all-
Union-ministries in industrial enterprises in the various ,republics and that the
represents a contribution to general services. These intricacies of the
Soviet budget may never be fully revealed to the world as long as the present regime
is in powar- It is a fact, however, that the real income of the workers and peasants
in the Baltic lands has declined, whereas according to data released by the Soviets
themselves, the real income of the workers in the USSR has increased."
end
CONFIDENTIAL/US OFFICIAIS ONLY/SECURITY INFORMATION
pproved for Release: 2019/07/30 CO2720023