MEETING WITH MR. WILLIAM MCAFEE, DDC/INR DEPARTMENT OF STATE ON 6 FEBRUARY 1974
Document Type:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
01474416
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
9
Document Creation Date:
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date:
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number:
Case Number:
F-2007-00094
Publication Date:
February 11, 1974
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
![]() | 219.08 KB |
Body:
FIE)
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18�001474416
INTERNAL Li AFIDENTI AL
USE ONLY
rouavonce.rwzra wmawaramoonsaan
ROViTiNG AND RECORD SKEET _(D)(3)
SUBJECT: (Optional)
Meeting with Mr. Bill McAfee (State)
FROM:
-;i
EXTENSION NO.
DATE
19 7
TO: (Officer designation, room number, and
building)
� DATE
RECEIVED FORWARDED
OFFICER'S COMMENTS (Number each comment to show from whom
INITIALS to whom. Draw a line across column after each comment.)
Mr. Colby
DCI �
t'D
r�-��
�
8.
1
10.
12.
13.
14.
FORM
3-62 tal 1
Bill,
Attached is friy Memo for
the Record of my discussion with
Bill McAfee which I briefly
reported to you on 6.February 1974.
I think you would be
particularly interested in the
following paragraphs:
4-6:
10-15: THIRD COUNTRY (b)(3)
EFFORT
16: DEPARTMENT OF
STATE COMPLAINTS
19:- RE-WRITE OF ROGER
CHANNEL AIRGRAM 6693 which
was meant to be the substitute for
the Presidential letter that you had
proposed.
USE I,REVIOuS INTERNAL
n CONFIDENTIAL 11 nmiv
[(b)(3)
IMCLASS, El ED
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Ii February 1974
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Meeting with Mr. William McAfee, DDC/INR
Department of State on 6 February 1974
ROBERT R. MULLEN COMPANY
1. On 6 February 1974 I visited Mr. William McAfee,
DDC/INR, to brief him of our use of the Robert R. Mullen Company
for Initially this meeting
was scheduled for the afternoon o eoruary '74. Mr. McAfee had
to Cancel this date. I was not available the next day. By the time we
met, CBS had broadcast our cover involvement with the Mullen Company
via TV in the evening of 5 February and in an expanded version via
radio on 6 February 1974.
cover
2. I told Mr. McAfee that we had one officer under Mullen
and another officer
\ I said these officers
had beet engaged in operational activities which were compatible with
our understanding with the respective host intelligence services, but
that the latter had not been informed of their presence. I added that
toward the end of the previous week, we had become aware of the
possibility of the public revelation of our cover relationship with the
Mullen Company. We, therefore* instructed
to brief their Ambassadors and with their
concurrence, the chiefs of the liaison services. This was done on
2 February 1974, and on the same day, briefed Acting
Assistant Secretary of State Hummel. then informed
Assistant Secretary Hartman on 4 February. I said that as of the time
of our meeting, we had no indications that the publicity would result in
difficulties by thc but I stressed that
the reaction of
was never predicted.
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
_(b)(1)
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
3. Mr. McAfee expressed his particular disappointment of
not having been briefed on 2 February 1974. He said that he had been
in the office as Duty Officer. This would have put him in a position
to handle the inquiry by Deputy Assistant Secretary Wells Stabler on
5 February 1974. Mr. Stabler is the Deputy Assistant Secretary in the
Bureau of European Affairs responsible for the Low Countries. I let
this observation pass without comment. Mr. McAfee then asked me
for the names of the 2 fficers. I replied that as long as their
names had not been ma e p lic, I preferred not to do so.
(b)(3)
-2-
E(b)(1)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY KUBISCH LETTER TO AMBASSADORS IN THE
WH AREA
7. While arranging the meeting with Mr. -McAfee the previous
afternoon by telephone, he asked me whether I had seen the drafi letter
to ambassadors by Assistant Secretary Kubisch. I said I had, and that
it presented problems. Mr. McAfee said that Mr. Kubisch was anxious
to get it out. I suggested we discuss it during the meeting and informed
(b)(3)
8. Mr. McAfee asked Mr. James Gardner to join us. The
latter opened the meeting by stressing the urgency to get an agreed
draft. I said this could be achieved if Mr. Kubisch would accept that
CIA will not participate in the CASP exercise, and that discussion of
CIA personnel and activities would be on a bilateral basis between
the Department and CIA. I added that we had no problem with doing
this at the time of, but outside of the actual CASP review. Messrs.
McAfee and Gardner agreed that CIA affairs should not be discussed
in front of other participants in the CASP review.
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
-4-
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
kr;-tr.1 I L
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
-6-
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
DEPARTMENT OF STATE COMPLAINTS
16. Mr. McAfee then took his turn of getting some complaints
off his chest. It consisted of two items:
-0:
a. CIA's Use of the PFIAB
�
,
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
�SLIP Wlaen
Room NO.
joined us to discuss the Kubisch draft
of all Watergate rr.......-
said t
s re
Mr. Co
The a.ttached
(=YCI
-N-.1
expins wh.at is (
of vol:u.rnes. In. a�
complete set is
IG.
FROM 01C
BUILD1
FORM " 241
FEB 55
vjviiC
REPLW
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416
(b)(1)
(b)(3)
RE-WRITE OF ROGER CHANNEL CIRCULAR AIRGRAM 6693
19. 1 asked about the status of the re-write of Roger Channel
Circular Airgram 6693 of 17 December 1969. He said it was with the
Secretary of State. Mr. McAfee had previously told me of a number of
re-drafts, one of which finally went to Deputy Secretary Rush. He had it re-done
again, but INR took exception to the elimination of an unidentified paragraph.
The. last version and 'NW s dissent were sent to Secretary Kissinger where
Mr. McAfee believes it will rest for a good long while.
COMMENT
20. This frank and rather extensive exchange of views was
carried on in a very friendly atmosphere as an exposition of the respective
points of view and" heartburns " in the hope that it may assist in resolving
some long-standing issues.
�DCI
DT.30
.ADDO
C/AF, C/NE, C/SB (Paras. 4-6; 10-15)
Cr,VH (Paras.4 -6; 7-9; 10-15)
CFA, C/EUR (Paras. 1-6, 10-15)
Chrono
-8-
(b)(3)
(b)(3)
Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01474416