MEMO FOR ALL CIA EMPLOYEES RE PRESS REPORTS OUTLINE IN DETAIL CERTAIN ALLEGED CIA ACTIVITIES WITH RESPECT TO MR. HOWARD HUNT AND OTHER PARTIES

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
01435040
Release Decision: 
RIFPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
9
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-00094
Publication Date: 
May 9, 1973
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon memo for all cia employee[15132481].pdf405.96 KB
Body: 
AD Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON, D,C, 20505 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR 9 May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR ALL CIA EMPLOYEES . 1. Recent press reports outline in detail certain alleged CIA activities with respect to,Mr. Howard Hunt and other parties. The presently known facts behind these stories are those stated in the attached draft of a statement I will be making to the Senate Committee on Appropriations on 9 May. As can be seen, the Agency provided limited assistance in response to a request by senior officials. The Agency has cooperated with and made available to the appropriate law 4 enforcement bodies information about these activities and will con- tinue to do so. 2. All CIA employees should understand my attitude on this type of issue. I shall do everything in my power to confine CIA activities to those which fall within a strict interpretation of its legislative charter. I take this position because I am determined that the law shall be respected and because this is the best way to foster the legitimate and necessary contributions we in CIA can make to the national security of the United States. 3. I am taking several actions to implement this objective: - I have ordered all the senior operating officials of this Agency to report to me immediately on any activities now going on, or that have gone on in the past, which might be construed to be outside the legislative charter of this Agency. - I hereby direct every person presently employed by CIA to report to me on any such activities of has knowledge. I invite all ex-employees to (Ae same. Anyone who has such information should cal) iy secretary (extension 6363) and say that he wishPs to talk to me about "activities outside CIA's cAIdrter." ADMINISTU - 'IAL USE ONLY Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 _jot _3roved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 sus.J.wf� � 1111LRINVAL UJE. VOILI 4. To ensure that Agency activities are proper in the future, I hereby promulgate the following standing order for all CIA employees: Any CIA employee who believes that he has received instructions which in any way appear inconsistent with the CIA legislative charter shall inform the Director of Central Intelligence immediately. ADMINISTRATIVE La: � . ames R. Schlesinger Director SE ONLY Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 ,14 DCI STATEMENT SENATE APPROPRIATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE YON INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS . 9 MAY 1973 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 OPENING STATEMENT Hr. Chairman, I am here to discuss the questions which have arisen over CIA's real and alleged role in events that occurred in 1971 and 1972. I have opened a detailed investigation into the precise nature of that role. I can report to you on what Agency records, now being intensively reviewed, reveal at this juncture. However I do not yet know that I have all the facts in the matter. Nonetheless,. I am pleased to present to you such facts as are now available, and I will certainly provide you with any further details as they come to my attention. Let Me start with the s relationship with Mr. Howard Hunt, whose testimony has recently been made public. Mr. Hunt was a staff employee oftheAgency from 8 November 1949 to 30 April 1970, At that time na retired from the Agency. He performed one editorial job of writing up a recommendation for an award for one of our officers in November 1970. He was not paid for these services, although the Agency placed the sums of $200.00 and $50.00 in two charitable organizations for the service performed. In early July 1971, General Cushman, then the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, received a telephone call from the White House. He was informed that Mr. Hunt had become a consultant on security affairs for the White House, and a request was made that Mr. Hunt receive assistance from the Agency. The minutes of the Agency Morning Meeting of 8 July 1971 indicate that the DDCI (General Cushman) reported a call by John Ehrlichman stating that Howard Hunt had been appointed a White House security consultdnt. On 22 aly 1971 Mr. Hunt visited General Cushman atthg ciA building. According to the records, Mr. Hunt stated that he had been charged with a highly sensitive mission by the White House to visit and elicit information Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 from an individual whose ideology he was not entirely sure of, and for that _ purpose he said he was asked to come to the Agency to see if he could get two things: identification documents in alias and some degree of physical - disguise, for a one-time operation. He stressed that he wanted the matter to be held as closely as possible and that he would like to meet the Agency people in an Agency safehouse. Agency records indicate that, in the course of the conversation, Mr runt referred to Mr. Ehrlichman by name and General Cushman acknowledged an earlier call from Mr. :"..� Ehrlichman to him. The Committee May desire to query General Cushman whose knowledge would not come from such secondary sources.. General Cushman directed the appropriate technical service of the Agency to be of assistance to Mr. Hunt, based on the above request. On 23 July 1971 Mr. Hunt was given alias documents, including a Social Security card, driver's license, and several association membership cards, in the name of "Edward Joseph Warren" similar to material he had been furnished for operational use while he had been an Agency employee, under the name of "Edward V. Hamilton." The same day Mr. Hunt was also given disguise materials' (a wig, glasses, and a speech alteration device). By calling an unlisted telephone number given him, Mr. Hunt arranged several additional meetings with Agency technical officers, the dates of which cannot be provided with precision. In these, he requested and was provided a commercial tape recorder (in a typewriter case) and a commercial Tessina camera disguised in a tobacco pouch. He also brought in a then-unidentified associate (later identified from press photos as Mr. G. Gordon Liddy) and secured for him a disguise (wig and glasses.) and alias documents in the name of "George F. Leonard." Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 -3- The Agency technical officers met these requests despite the absence of the procedural steps and approvals normally required by Agency regulations. However, they became increasingly concerned at the escalation of Mr. Hunt's requests for assistance. These finally included a request from Mr. Hunt to be met on the morning of 27 August 1971, upon his return from California, to have a film developed and returned to him. This was done the same day. He also asked for a New York mail address and telephone-answering service for operational Use. � The technical. officers raised their concern with senior officers, who noted the possibility that these activities could involve the Agency in operations outside its proper functions. As a result, again according to Agency records, General Cushman telephoned Mr. Ehrlichman at the White House on 27 August 1971 and explained that further such assistance could not be given. Mr. .Ehrlichman agreed. The request for mail address and telephone answering service was not honored. 'On 31 August 1971, Mr. Hunt contacted the technical officers again, requesting a credit card, but this was refused. Mr. Hunt had also made a request on 18 August 1971 for the assignment of a secretary he had known during his Agency career. This was also refused. The earlier-furnished alias documents ad other material were not recovered, however, except for the Tessina camera which was returned on 27 August as unsuitable. Since the end of August 1971, the Technical Services Division has had no further association with Mr. Hunt. As a point of reference, I would note that the break-in of the office of Mr. Ellsberg's psychiatrist took place on or about 3 September 1971. Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 001435040 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 The Agency outlined the above events to Mr. Patrick Gray, Acting Director of the FBI, in letters dated 5and 7 July 1972, and a meeting On 28 July 1972. A series of qtjestions were asked the Agency on 11 October 1972 by Mr. Earl Silbert, Principal Assistant United States Attorney for the District of Columbia. On 24 October 1972, Attorney General Kleindienst and . Assistant Attorney General Petersen reviewed the 5.and 7 July transmittals' � ..� .. � � ., togeter with additional, more detailed but undated materials, that had been- � provided to Acting FBI Director Gray on 18 October. 1972. The Agency is aware that this material was reviewed on 27 November 1972 by Mr. Silbert, who asked additional questions on that date as well as on 29 November 1972. Written responses to the foregoing questions were provided on 13 December 1972. An additional submission was made to the Assistant Attorney General Petersen on 21 December 1972. This material was discussed at a meeting held with Assistant Attorney General Petersen and Mr. Silbert on 22 December 1972. - All of the foregoing materials can .be made available to the Committee if it - so desires. As a separate matter, which was not known by those who prepared the material for the Department of Justice in the fall of last year, the Office of Medical Services of the Agency prepared and forwarded to the White House � ' � two indirect personality assessments of Mr. Daniel Ellsberg. The Agency has , . - had a program of producing, on a selective basis, such assessments or studies on foreign leaders for many years. In July 1971 Mr. Helms, then Director, instructed Agency officers to work with Mr. David Young of the White House Staff relative to security leaks in the intelligence community. Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 Mr. Young Young requested a study on Mr. Ellsbarg in the latter part of July 1971, which Agency activity was apparently approved by Mr. Helms. At that time, Mr. Young supplied raw material consisting principally of newspaper and magazine articles together with some State Department and Justice Department papers. The first assessment delivered to the White House dated 9 August 1971, was judged insufficient. As a result, there were several meetings between Dr:Malloy, Mr. Hunt and Mr. Liddy, in which classified information of the Justice and State Departments was introduced. One such meeting occurred on 12 August 1972./ Additional material vas transmitted by Mr. Hunt on 12 October, and another meeting was held on 27 October. These meetings led to a second version of the assessment, dated 9 November 1971. This document was delivered to the Executive Office by Dr. Malloy on 12 November 1971. Agency records indicate that Mr. Helms - had previously communicated with Mr Young indicating he had read both reports. In another contact about October 1971," an Agency officer arranged to provide Mr. Hunt certain unclassified materials from CIA files relative to a 1954 French case of leakage of Government documents. delivered to his office at the White House. In closing, I would like to stress several (,ondlusions of nt( investigation so far: a CIA had no awareness of the details of Mr. Hunt's activities. The Agency's impression was that Mr. Hunt was engaged in an activity related to identifying and closing off the security leaks that were so much a preoccupation of the Government at the time: Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 � Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040 b. The Agency clearly was insufficiently cautious in the initiation of its assistance to Mr. Hunt. .Later, when the nature of Mr. Hunt's requests for assistance began to indicate a possible active involvement by the Agency in activities beyond its charter, the . Agency terminated the relationship and refused further assistance. c. The preparation of a profile on an American citizen under these circumstances lies beyond the normal activity of the Agency. It shall not be repeated -- and I have so instructed the staff. This shall be made a part of the regulations governing such activities. d. As Director, .I have called for a review of all Agency activities and the termination of any which might be considered outside its legitimate charter. In addition to requesting this review from my subordinates, I have directed each employee and invited each ex-employee to submit to me any cases which they may question. an determined that the Agency will not engage in activities outside of its charter but will concentrate its energies on its important intelligence mission. Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01435040