GENERAL: OFFICE OF SECURITY SURVEY SPECIFIC: <SANITIZED>

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
01430440
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
4
Document Creation Date: 
December 28, 2022
Document Release Date: 
August 7, 2017
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2007-00094
Publication Date: 
May 11, 1973
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon general office of securit[15132146].pdf197.69 KB
Body: 
� . :1-Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 .001430440Z) � ,..t� L. I . . . SUBJECT: (0p,ionol) FROM: JOLawrence __ROUTING AND RECORD -SHEET TO: (Officer des:gnation, room number, and buildlng) DATE RECEIVED FORWARDED ExTENSION OF INITIALS (b)(3) NO. _ DATE 11 May 1973 COMMENTS (Number cock comment to show from whom to whom. Draw o line ocross column after cock comment.) Broe 4. 8. 10. 12. 3. 14. 15. 00058 1.14 PREVIOUS iEDITIONS SECRET CONFIDENTIAL ri INTERNAL I-1 USE ONLY UNCLASSIFIED Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440 .1I 'I -Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440z) _ � ll'May 1973 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: General: OuficeofSecu.rity Survey Specific: _ 1. At the Director's instruction, and with the concurrence of the then DD/P, the Office of Security developed informants in RID to report on the activities of RID employees on whom security questions had arisen. This program, which included upwards of a dozen informants at its peak, has declined to its present level of . three, only one of whom is reporting regularly on matters of current interest. � __. Z. The principal object of Security's interest through informant is a female who was employed in RID for a number of years until she resigned in 1969. Her resignation coincided with the initiation of a security review on her by the Office of Security, but Security does not know whether the employe % was aware of this s-ecuri,ty review at. the time of her resignation. s 3. Security's interest in this employee was occasioned by reports that she had developed an increasingly intimate acquaintance with a Cuban national. Reporting by one informant, who was also being developed by the Cuban, suggested that the Cuban might have an intelligence interest in the female.. The same informant also sub- s equently reported that the Cuban had .nuMeroas other' contactsamong clerical and secretarial employees of thJ Agency. � 4. Subsequent to her departure from the Agency, the ex-RID - employee entered into a common-law marital relationship with ther' Cuban and joined him as partner in a photographic business. In this capacity she solicited business among CIA employees, especially those requiring passport photos. Recently, she and the Cuban sought, . to employ Security's informant in this business on a part-time basis. . . CL Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440 - -Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440R. 4 5. Information on the background of the Cuban is fairly extensive, but it is inconclusive. I-Te is known to have been a member of anti- Castro organizations in this country. There are also reports that his mother was imprisoned in Cuba at one time. There are other episodes in his life that suggest intelligence involvement on his part with some hostile service, but this is not yet definitely established. 6. The Office of Security has had at times a second informant in this case. His reporting has tended to confirm reporting by the principal informant. 8. The Office of Security has been running this operation for over two years, in an effort to obtain conclusive proof of its intelli- gence nature. CI Staff has been kept informed. The FBI, which was informed of the case at an early stage, has declined to take re- sponsibility for it, on grounds that it concerns CIA's internal security. As a result, the Office ofSecurity has been inhi bited in the actions it can take against the Cuban suspect. On the other hand, Security has not taken any action against Agency employees for fear of com- promising the operation. 9. It would appear to me that the Office of Security has dallied with this case long enough. Apparently unable through positive measures to resolve doubts about the case, 0/S has followed the course of watch- ful waiting, hoping the Cuban would take precipita t action himself that would give us the evidence we seek. In the meantime, our knowledge of the relationship between the Cuban and the several other current Agency employees with whom he is known to have contact continues 00060 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440 - -Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440g, The possibility that the employee in SB Division may be passing information on CIA's Soviet operations is too great to warrant further delay in moving against her. John 0. Lawrence 3 00061 Approved for Release: 2017/01/18 C01430440