COMPANY 1, MAIN FORCE BATTALION, MILITARY REGION 3.
Document Type:
Keywords:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
00758613
Release Decision:
RIPPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
3
Document Creation Date:
April 27, 2019
Document Release Date:
April 30, 2019
Sequence Number:
Case Number:
Publication Date:
March 2, 1968
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
COMPANY 1, MAIN FORCE BAT[15617833].pdf | 357.31 KB |
Body:
�
, Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00758613
gibiUM71
CONFIDE TI - KIN
INTERRO6ATION REP
RAND�I
R 1 L1568
THIS REPORT IS THE AgsuLT OF THE INTERROGATION ACTIVITY CONDUCTED
BY THE NATIONAL INTERROGATION CENTER (NIC) UNDER THE JOINT AUSPICES
OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATION (CIO) AND THE U.S. CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA) WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF DETACHMENT 6,
6499TH SPECIAL ACTIVITIES GROUP (USAF).
,
.� �`.
, �
COUNTRY �
:
SOUTH VIETNAM (SVN)
NIC REPORT NO :
mIC CASE NO :
236/68
FET
suBnar
Co mpany 1, Main Force
i
DATE OF REPORT:
2/3/68
battali on, litary Region 3.
NO. OF PAGES :
3
DATE OF INFO
: 30-31 January 1968
REFERENCE :
None
DATE AND PLACE 6 February 1968 (H-P)
OF ACQUISITICN : SAIGON, VIETNAM
This report was collected by a,NIC'Fidd-EXPloitation Team on 6 February 1968
in SAIGON City, SVN. Source is not available at the NIC for further exploitation.
3.3(h)(2)
3.3(
)(2)
� DISTRIBUTION:
MACV
� US EMBASSY (OSA)
CLASSIFICATION
K I N
C 0N F I DJ41TIAL
,EXCLUDED CM AUTOMATIC
GRADING AND,
ECLASSIFICATION
MAR" 2
POsktie
4"':::'*).1 4-41_4_,.
.1
. h.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
NOTICE; II NIATENIAL CEINAINS ortroamaTtoft
AFFECTING NE NATIUNAI EIEFSIESE OF 104E HAIM
STATES WIT IA 110'. MEANING OF OIE eSPILINAGE
LAW.S. TITLE ACTIONS /03 IMO FAO.
THE tRANSIPIOSIN/�OSVSLATION OF WIIMO
NIT NANNEA TO AS
AtEsEHOISSO EIV LAW. ; t .� ��":'
" 4400
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 000758613
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00758613
KIN
NIC REPORT NO : 236/68
Page 2
Company 1 quartered in TAY NINH Province near the Cambodian border to
carry out rice transportation missions from August 1966 to mid-1967.
The unit travelled from its camp to the Cambodian border twice a
month to collect rice. Each man normally carried about 20 kilos, but
the weaker among them carried only about 15. The unit never saw any
personnel at the rice storage area. Located at the area was a building
which housed about 100 wooden barrels, each holding about 40 litres of
rice. Since members of this unit were serving time as punishment, the
VC did not trust them with weapons and only armed the unit's five
guards with CKC and AKA rifles. The unit usually left its quartering
site at 0500 hours and arrived at the rice storage area at 1700 hours;
it made the return trip immediately. The rice was stored in a hut at
�the quartering site. No other units were located in this area.
2. On 30 January 1968, Battalion Commander BA HOC advised Company 1 that
it was to move to Saigon at 1800 hours that date to attack the GVN
radio station there. The soldiers received no training prior to the
attack; however, the unit had been in combat on three occasionswhile
it wasi quartered in BIEN HOA Province in 1967. Led by Source's
unit began walking at 1800 and arrived in Saigon at 2400 . Source
carried an AKA rifle with 300 rounds, but he had only four magazines.
Because Source was ill, another comrade helped him carry his ammunition.
The other members of the company carried AKA rifles with 300 rounds of
ammunition and two grenades each. One soldier carried a B40, and another
four B40 shells. The company's strength had been depleted in previous
actions during the past six months; 15 men had been killed or wounded
in an engagement with GVN troops at VINH PHU, and 25 in VINH BINH.
Company 1 attacked the Saigon radio station at midnight 31 January 1968
an met with resistance from GVN forces. The attack failed: after three
hours of fighting, the VC had to withdraw, hide their weapons, and escape.
. Their orders had been to occupy the station. However, the Battalion
Commander had given no other instructions as to how long to remain there
or what to do after the attack. The men t no reinforcements or
reserves would be sent in to help them, fled the scene. After
Source and two comrades threw their weep a y, they wandered around
the city and at 0700 hours were stopped by two GVN policemen who asked
for their papers. The police arrested the VC who then led them to the
place where they had concealed their weapons.
Company 1 Was given no briefings on other units going to the Saigon area
and, since the companies of its battalion did not quarter together, no
one knew where they were deployed. No women were included in Company 1,
and the soldiers did not receive any pills to keep them awake the night
before the attack. The company received no support from the local people
either before, during, or after the attack. When people saw Source and
his comrades, they closed and locked their doors. Source had no escape
plan set up; he and his comrades were trying to find a car when they
were arrested by the GVN police.
ThiOughout the TET attack Source and his comrades had poor morale. They
did, not want to fight because after three prior combat actions they were
discouraged and afraid to die; they were afraid of failing in Saigon and
were very surprised at the order to fight there. Twelve of Source's
comrades had previously tried to escape to return to their families;
Source claimed that he had tried unsuccessfully to escape on three
ocCasions, often tried to motivate Source and to calm his fears;
3.3(h)(2)
3.3(h)(2)
3.3(h)(2:
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00758613
4, .
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00758613
KIN
NIC REPORT NO : 236/68
Page 3
he company:commander did not take away Source's probationary membership
in the People's Revolutionary Party (PRP), but kept him under ,surveillance.
Source did not know about other areas of fighting in Saigon or in the
countryside. Informed oak of his unit's immOiate objective, he had
no information about future attacks on the city, or how the failure of
this attack would be explained away by the Libertion Front and the
HANOI Government.
(Ipterrogator's Comment: Until the clemency policy was explained to
Source 'after an hour of interrogation, Source was highly uncooperative.
Afterwards, although still resisting, Source volunteered a little
information although he took great care in answering questions and was
probably lying. He had little or no concept of dates and is illiterate.
3.3(h)(2)
CONFIDENTIAL � KIN 6
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00758613