SPECIAL INTERROGATIONS WITH ATTACHED ROUTING SLIP

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
00144710
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
November 22, 2024
Document Release Date: 
January 15, 1983
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
Publication Date: 
May 19, 1952
File: 
Body: 
11�ITM 101. -.������cl ." � - 0.11,T144.1r.."���=. Cr- . Col:/f771. CI aWn�-�� --- O/C/ rice 67720W177Cfr.1.1�firrir4iUN.I4317TE D STATES GOVERNMENT TO FROM : SUBJECT: Assistant Director/Scientific Intelligence DATE: 19 May 1952 Chief, Medical Staff Special Interrogations 1. Reference is made to the attached draft; subject ."Special.Interrocations." 2: At the mectina of 14 May 1952 the Medical Office outlined its position regarding the Artichoke Project and requested that the term "rarco-hypnosis" be used to define those responsibilities within the interim program that are basically medical. This was agreed., and. it was with such understanding that further concepts of responsibilities were evolved. � . 3. ..The attached draft provides the delegation of auth- ority in regard research to the Medical Office, and lists in its "description" varied techniques Tjertinant to such research. This would extend the scope of medical responsibilities beyond the previously agreed definition. i. It was. also asreed at the meeting of 14 May 1952 that "'field activities would be under the command of the chief of field station concerned, previded that instances of this agree- mant would be referred back to headquarters for final decision. Paragraph 2a(3) does not pJbvide for the qualifying phrase. 5. It is requested that the project draft more closely outline the concept of medical responsibility as originally defined and that Paragraph 2a(3) be chanced to provide for the necessary qualifying phrase. .r.Kr`riMr45".4.7 � T?,E.":47�0",t74- .. OW- � ' � rkr,.7:444 � � � Attach.: 1 1. Project Draft 144=2:*(19 1.111.Y 1952) Distribution: Oria & 1 Lddreesee 1 File lr"--q"--2-�''' � *- ' � " s'""�ft�����=...t.c.2. � � � 4 '!" � '-... 7". - � f..;�;,"`t ' .... : - .�:,.. ' ......... ;...... 1 w" � """1"."' ' ".3"'.."������116 'ft. . .� ������-��...:, ���� � ��: ... .%.....r� ,..=�=2"Hr...f.:1�::77.�1 � ". ' lia.i......;...6....4.1.7 ��:-..".C.Aa��� 1 � .........`,.....� � � . I. f ezz) at. -- � :.,...- TRAtiSM � . i' � � . . � � I I TA L S 1: I P DAIL _Zay_..4.9.,_le.152.______. TO: � . BUILDING � .. ROOM t40. .- . � � REMARKS: - - - . Joe: ..-. / have read the enclosed TS document and, as.C.....--:. - knows, am in candid era'olts diswzre.ement with it. I t seems to ine to be a belated attempt to make Up for 2 or 3 years confusio7 and ineffecti�.-ness. I cuestion the security in dains the study in this. way, if it is to be done at all. If this is str,:posed to be covered. up as a defensive feasibility study, it's i - pretty damn transparent. There is a of obvious e:�:-ner-Imantal work that ne. +0.1.-.�a A ^-,-, Mr.,. 7 ..z....N.. :-. ....... IA. _. ... FROM:bezin to Get it done. BUILDING . IROOM NO. � . 1EXTEnSiON � . FORM NO. 36. s � . SEP 1946 ��.� � ���..