IN RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS REGARDING KEY MILESTONES IN OUR ASSESSMENTS OF IRAQ'S NUCLEAR PROGRAM

Document Type: 
Collection: 
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 
0005607098
Release Decision: 
RIPPUB
Original Classification: 
U
Document Page Count: 
2
Document Creation Date: 
June 24, 2015
Document Release Date: 
June 23, 2011
Sequence Number: 
Case Number: 
F-2006-00667
Publication Date: 
September 14, 2002
File: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon DOC_0005607098.pdf33.74 KB
Body: 
APPROVED FOR RELEASED DATE: 06-13-2011 In 1979 and 1980, the Intelligence Community concluded there was no hard evidence that Iraq had decided to acquire nuclear weapons but judged Baghdad had positioned itself to do so by developing its nuclear infrastructure. These assessments, based on foreign nuclear cooperation projects underway with suppliers from Russia, France, and Italy, accurately captured Iraq's weapons potential. - We now believe, based on subsequent inspection and defector information, that Saddam had decided to pursue nuclear weapons by the late 1970s ~ srael's destruction of the Osirak reactor in 1981 and war-related economic difficulties had not dampened Iraqi interest in enhancing its nuclear capabilities. CIA anticipated that once the war with Iran ended, which happened in 1988, the nuclear program would accelerate. . - This assessment erred in putting Baghdad at least a decade away from having nuclear facilities with the potential to support a weapons program, underestimating Iraq's potential by seven years. F-----] that it could complete a weapon in less than.10 years from a go-ahead decision. - Accompanying these strengthened judgments was a worst case scenario in which CIA assessed Baghdad could have a weapon in as little as two to four years if it had a clandestine source of fissile material. produce a weapon b the late 1990s, CIA became surer of these conclusions ut mistakenly put less emphasis on the prospect for a worst case scenario. The current analytical debate over Iraq's ultimate use of high-strength aluminum tubes mirrors some of the pre-war interagency disagreements on whether Iraq had a nuclear weapons program. While all agencies agree that the aluminum tubes could be used in centrifuges, today's debate centers on whether