FITNESS REPORT - CARANCI, JOHN C.

• Document Type: FOIA
• Keywords: CARANCI JOHN C
• Collection: FOIA Collection
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 0001496490
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 2
• Document Creation Date: June 22, 2015
• Document Release Date: December 31, 2008
• Case Number: F-2007-00327
• Publication Date: October 15, 1969

(b1131
(b1121
EMPLOYEE SERIAL NUMBER
FITNESS REPORT
SECTION A GEN
ERAL
I. NAME (Last) (First) (Middle)
2. DATE OF BIRTH
S. SEX
4. GRADE
5. SD
CARANCI, John C.
02/07/22
M
GS-1
6. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE
7. OFF/DIV/BR
MENT
6. CURRENT STATION
D & E Tech
DDP/TSD
Washington, DC
9. CHECK (X) TYPE OF APPOINTMENT
10. CHECK (X) TYPE OF REPORT
CAREER RESERVE TEMPORARY
INITIAL
REASSIGNMENT SUPERVISOR
CAREER-PROV-ISIONAL (See instructions - Section.C)
X
ANNUAL
REASSIGNMENT EMPLOYEE
SPECIAL (Specify):
SPECIAL (Specify):
11. DATE REPORT DUE IN OP.
12. REPORTING PERIOD (From- to)
31 October 1969
11
1- May 1969 - 3b September 1969
SECTION B PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
W - Weak Performance ranges from wholly inadequate to slightly less than satisfactory. A rating in this category requires
positive remedial action. The nature of the action could range from counseling, to further training, to placing on
probation, to reassignment or to separation. Describe action taken or:proposed in *Section C.
A - Adequate Performance meets all requirements. It is entirely satisfactory and is characterized neither by deficiency nor
excellence.
P - Proficient Performance is more than satisfactory. Desired results are being produced in a proficient manner.
S - Strong Performance is characterized by exceptional proficiency.
0 - Outstanding Performance is so exceptional in relation to requirements of the work and in comparison to the performance of
others doing similar work as to warrant special recognition.
SPECIFIC DUTIES
List up to six of the most important specific duties performed during the rating period. Insert rating letter which best describes the
manner in which employee performs EACH specific duty. Consider ONLY effectiveness in performance of that duty. All employees
with supervisory responsibilities MUST be rated on their ability to supervise (indicate number of employees supervised).
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. I
RATING
LETTER
See reverse
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 2
RATING
LETTER
APPROVED FOR RELEASED D,A
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 3 12-Nov-2008
RATING
ETTER
L
ri
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 4 ?.
RATING
LETTER
rnx
SPECIFIC DUTY NO, 5
RATING
LETTER
SPECIFIC DUTY NO. 6
RATING
LETTER
OVERALL PERFORMANCE IN CURRENT POSITION
RATING
Take into account everything about the employee which influences his effectiveness in his current position such as per-
LETTER
formance of specific duties, productivity, conduct on job, cooperativeness, pertinent personal traits or habits, and
particular limitations or talents. Based on your knowledge of employee's overall performance during the rating period,
place the letter in the rating box corresponding to the statement which most accurately reflects his level of performance.
GROUP 1
FORM 45
4-65 J USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS
E.4.d.d f o, ame
dawn Brading and
d
dedarslfiwlion
 (When Filled In)
SECTION C NARRATIVE COMMENTS
Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping,.irp?proper perspective their relationship to
overall performance. State suggestions made for improvement of work performance. Gi4tfrE omrf-#en4ptions for training. Comment
on foreign language competence, if required for current position. Amplify or explain ratings given in Ssbt`foiit'B& provide best
basis for determining future personnel action, Manner of performance of managerial or supervisory duties and cost consciousness
in the use of personnel, space, equipment and funds, must be commented on if app icable. If extra space is needed to complete
Section C, attach a separate sheet of paper.
C
i
t
d h
E
M
l E
~a
d
c
i
aranc
.
re
urne
ome on
mergency
a
e
i
v
c t
i from
n 22 April 1969 a been on extended sick leave until 22 Sept.
1969 when he returned to the or light duty. Presely},s performing
the needed duty of reestablis ng our stock levels of standard and special
hardware.
SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS
1.
BY EMPLOYEE
1C
DATE
/-'~
2.
MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN
UNDER MY SUPERVISION
ON
1 Month -
DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUP TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE
14 October 1969 C /TSD
3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL
COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL
John Caranci has only been with this Laboratory since late September
and it is unfair to comment on performance after such a short period of time.
We certainly hope that he returns to good health and resumes his normal
? strong performance.
DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL T E
14 October 1969 C/TSD/: