REPORT OF EFFICIENCY RATING - BARNARD, EDWARD T.

• Document Type: FOIA
• Keywords: PERSONNEL FILES
• Keywords: BARNARD EDWARD T
• Collection: FOIA Collection
• Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST): 0001459655
• Release Decision: RIPPUB
• Original Classification: U
• Document Page Count: 1
• Document Creation Date: June 22, 2015
• Document Release Date: April 17, 2008
• Case Number: F-2007-01040
• Publication Date: February 7, 1949

Standard Form No. 51
August 1946
U. S. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
REPORT OF
EFFICIENCY RATING
ADMINISTRATIVE-UNOFFICIAL, .
OFFICIAL:
REGULAR (X) SPECIAL
PROBATIONAL
/ 7/ 2-5/4 8 1/25/49
As of ----- 1~ 2 9 ----------------------- based on performance during period from -__ --- _______------ to --__ ----------------
Edward T. Barnard Inte-11igence--Officer P-6
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Name of employee) (Title of position, service, and grade)
00,_ Con pact
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Organization-Indicate bureau, division, section, unit, field station)
ON LINES BELOW
MARI{ EMPLOYEE
1. Study the instructions in the Rating Official's Guide, C. S. C. Form
No. 3823A. ,
2. Underline the elements which are especially important in the position.
3. Rate only on elements pertinent to the position.
a. Do not rate on elements in italics except for employees in admin-
istrative, supervisory, or planning positions.
b. Rate administrative, supervisory, and planning functions on
elements in italics.
Administrative,
supervisory, or
planning -------
Maintenance of equipment, tools, instruments.
Mechanical skill.
Skill in the application of techniques and pro-
cedures.
_ i(4) Presentability of work (appropriateness of ar-
rangement and appearance of work).
-t (5) Attention to broad phases of assignments.
'(6) Attention to pertinent detail.
______ (7) Accuracy of operations.
______ (8) Accuracy of final results.
___ (9) Accuracy of judgments or decisions.
__ (10) Effectiveness in presenting ideas or facts.
______(11) Industry.
______(12) Rate of progress on or completion of assign-
ments.
______(13) Amount of acceptable work produced. (Is mark
based on production records? _____________________
or no)
______(14) Ability to organize his work. (Yes
r-(15) Effectiveness in meeting and dealing with
of ers.
f (16) Cooperativeness.
--J(17) Initiative.
______(18) Resourcefulness.
_:L_ (19) Dependability.
______ (20) Physical fitness for the work.
(21) Effectiveness in planning broad programs.
(22) Effectiveness in adapting the work program to
broader or related programs.
(23) Effectiveness in devising procedures.
(24) Effectiveness in laying out work and establish-
ing standards of performance for subordi-
nates.
(25) Effectiveness in directing, reviewing, and check-
ing the work of subordinates.
_____(26) Effectiveness in instructing, training, and
developing subordinates in the work.
(27) Effectiveness in promoting high working morale.
______ (28) Effectiveness in determining space, personnel,
and equipment needs.
______ (29) Effectiveness in setting and obtaining adher-
/11 to time limits and deadlines.
(30) Ability to make decisions.
------ (31) Effectiveness in delegating clearly defined
authority to act.
STATE ANY OTHER ELEMENTS CONSIDERED
- - - (A) -----------------------------------------------------
(B) --------------------------------------------------------
(C) ------------------------------------------------------------
STANDARD
Deviations must he explained on reverse side of this form
Form approved.
Budget Bureau No. 50-R012.3.
Adjective
Rating
Plus marks on all underlined elements, and check marks or better on all
other elements rated---------------------------------------------------------------------- Excellent
Check marks or better on all elements rated, and plus marks on at least
half of the underlined elements________________________________________________________ Very Good
Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and all weak
performance overcompensated by outstanding performance___________________ Good
Check marks or better on a majority of underlined elements, and all weak
performance not overcompensated by outstanding performance______________ Fair
Minks marks on at least half of the underlined elements__________________________ Unsatisfactory
official--
Adjective
Rating
Reviewing ile official__ __________
----------------------
Report to employee ____ ?----------
efficiency rating committee ___ ?z_
APPROVED FOR RELEASE
DATE: FEB 2008