INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST AID TO NORTH VIETNAM
Document Type:
Keywords:
Collection:
Document Number (FOIA) /ESDN (CREST):
00011747
Release Decision:
RIFPUB
Original Classification:
U
Document Page Count:
10
Document Creation Date:
April 27, 2019
Document Release Date:
April 30, 2019
Sequence Number:
Case Number:
Publication Date:
March 2, 1968
File:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST A[15617751].pdf | 352.71 KB |
Body:
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNIST AID TO NORTH VIETNAM
Sec D �
- ��-�
�
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
I.
s (0)64)
Approvad or
Date
1
2 March 1968
No. 0638/68
R,1
*2
. Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
s (a) C-4)
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
2 March 1968
INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM
International Communist Aid to North Vietnam
Summary
The USSR continues to provide the overwhelm-
ing share of the increasing amounts of military
aid being provided to North Vietnam and is willing
to sustain this commitment at present or even
higher levels.[la deliveries will increase even
further in 19684: ithere
is no quantitative limit to the types of the-Is-
sistance that the USSR would provide with the pos-
sible exception of offensive weapons that would
result in a confrontation with the US.E:
:Ithe USSR cannot refuse to provide aid
if it wishes to maintain its position in the so-
cialist camp.
L: does not believe that the recent
increase in aid eliveries reflects an awareness
on the part of European Communist power that the
Tet offensive was imminent.
the USSR has not been able to use its aid
pro ams as a means of influencing North Vietnam'
conduct of the war.[3the Chinese
are a more influential power.
I . (a) (-4)
Finally,
[7. :Ithe USSR
will use force to maintain access to the port of
Haiphong. The evidence offered to support this
statement conflicts sharply with the present judg-
ment of the intelligence community and is under-
going extremely close scrutiny.
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
J
1.3(0)64)
� Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
AINEMON4
t.s62-X-4')
Soviet Military Aid to North Vietnam
1. The record of military aid deliveries to
North Vietnam in 1967 and information on agreements
for 1968 deliveries reflect the dominlant role of
the USSR as the main supplier of military equipment.
Information l:
jindicates that military aid deliveries from
North Vietnam's allies will increase even further
in 19684: :also makes it clear that
there is no quantitative limit to the aid that will
be provided to support North Vietnam's military ef-
fort.and to offset the effects of bombing of the
North or the material losses in South Vietnam.
Military Aid Deliveries in 1967
2. Our estimates of Communist military aid
deliveries by quantity and value in 1965, 1966,
and 1967 are shown in Tables 1 and 2. The value
of military materiel delivered to North Vietnam
in 1967 from the Soviet Union and Communist China
increased to a total of about $660 million, from
$455 million in 1966 and $270 million in 1965.
-2-
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
1611�����10.
Of the total value of goods delivered in 1967 the
Soviet Union supplied almost 80 percent--about the
same percentage of the total supplied in 1965 and
1966. Communist China supplied the bulk of the re-
mainder. Although East European countries supplied
only negligible quantities of combat materiel in
1965 and 1966, the amounts increased during 1967
and will be even greater in 1968.
3. Soviet military aid has concentrated on
air defense equipment including surface-to-air mis-
siles, antiaircraft guns, radar, and fighter air-
craft including MIG-21s. Chinese military aid has
concentrated on the build-up of North Vietnamese
ground forces and sustaining the military effort in
South Vietnam. More recently, China has provided
radar of increasing sophistication and apparently
has supplied large quantities of MIG-17s in 1967--
most of them being delivered in response to heavy
losses in the latter part of the year.
4. Although we cannot make a confident judg-
ment on levels of military deliveries at any par-
ticular time, there appear to have been erratic
changes in the categories of military goods pro-
vided by some donors during 1967. Communist China
delivered only eight MIG-15/17s during the two-
year period 1965-66 but is believed to have de-
livered about 61 of these aircraft in 1967 with
the bulk of them arriving in the latter part of
the year. About 12 were delivered in late October
and about 28 in December. The North Vietnamese
armored vehicle inventory probably was increased
substantially in the latter part of the year. Pho-
tography of October revealed at least 38 armored
vehicles or self-propelled guns at Ping-hsiang
China believed to be en route to North Vietnam from
the Soviet Union. L
these might well be a Czech-produced armored V;
hide known as the TOPAS. This vehicle was speci-
fically requested by the DRV delegation that ne-
gotiated 1968 deliveries in Prague during the fall
of 1967. C
-3-
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
LsCaX4)
,....Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
The 1967 Military Aid Agreements
5. During 5 August to 18 October 1967, rep-
resentatives of the DRV concluded with 12 Communist
countries* trade, aid, and technical-scientific
agreements that were generally declared to be for
strengthening the economic and national defense po-
tential of the DRV. Details on the agreements are
not available but public statements indicated that
at least Communist China, North Korea, Bulgaria,
Poland, USSR, Hungary and Rumania agreed to provide
military assistance without charge to the DRV.
6. The 1967 agreements were also significant
because for the first time the majority of the do-
nor countries acknowledged that military as well
as economic assistance was being provided to North
Vietnam.
7.E
:I The ne-
gotiations with the European Communist countries
were used, particularly by the USSR and Czechoslovakia,
as an opportunity to encourage North Vietnam to give
more public emphasis to its political rather than
its military objectives. This approach on the part
of the European Communist countries was reported to
reflect their interest in a negotiated settlement
of the war. The North Vietnamese rejected these ap-
proaches, partly on the belief that they can with-
stand present manpower losses "for a hundred years"
and partly on the belief that North Vietnam is ruin-
ing the US and its economy.
�
8. Hanoi was able to obtain commitments for
greater amounts of assistance but not to the levels
it sought. The need for increased levels of mili-
tary assistance is apparently regarded by the Com-
munist countries as a logical result of the increased
*These 12 countries are the USSR, Communist China,
Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, Rumania, East Germany,
Albania, Czechoslovakia, North Korea, Mongolia and
Cuba.
-4-
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
%maw,
�Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
ftwo.���
1.3 (c3C-0
damage caused by the bombing of the North and
the war in the South. Generally, Hanoi's
solicitations followed the pattern of previous
years andE :Irevealed no in-
tentions with respect to military strategy or North
Vietnam's views of the phasing of the war. f:
the North Vietnamese delegation
stressed the need for accelerated deliveries in 1968
but gave no elaborations on the reasons. L:
:Icomplaints on delays in deliv-
eries, attributable in part to Chinese obstruction,
have been chronic although abating somewhat in 1967.
9.E :/attributed the more widespread
acknowledgment that military assistance is being
provided to North Vietnam as simply a ploy to pre-
clude Chinese charges that European Communist coun-
tries are not helping their Communist ally.
Terms of the Agreements
10. The 1967 negotiations followed the pat-
tern of previous years. Military aid is negotiated
as a separate agreement whereas economic assistance
is negotiated as annual protocols to long-standing
agreements. All military assistance and much of the
economic assistance is grant aid. Although some
of the economic assistance is carried on the books
as credits,1: areported that there was no
expectation that these credits would be repaid. L:
also indicated that all of the donor countries are
aware that they will have to pick up much of the
costs of North Vietnam's postwar reconstruction.
The Limits of Soviet Aid Programs
11. The public announcements about the 1967
aid agreements and information on the volume of
goods being imported by North Vietnam all support
an upward trend in military assistance from all
donors, particularly the USSR. 1: made
several observations that confirm Soviet willing-
ness to give North Vietnam almost unlimited mili-
tary assistance.
-5-
%MOM*
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
sOC-0
it.861X.4)
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
imam*
12. Despite the fact that Hanoi's requests
to Czechoslovakia in the 1967 negotiations were
not fully met, the general impression among Czech
official circles is that North Vietnam is provided
essentially all the assistance it seeks. The out-
look is that military aid will stay at least at
its present high levels and if further assistance
is required it will be provided. The USSR,E:
3, feels that it cannot jeopardize
its position in the socialist camp by refusing to
meet demands for aid. He reported, moreover, that
the volume and sophistication of the aid provided
would have been even greater if it were not for
the Chinese. El ja Soviet of-
fer to provide more advanced equipment and tech-
nicians was refused by the North Vietnamese be-
cause the Chinese would object to a further influx
of Soviet technicians. The Soviets apparently are
not willing to provide this equipment without the
accompanying technicians.
13. The only practical inhibition to Soviet
willingness to provide aid at ever increasing levels
is the desire to avoid a confrontation with the US.
Thusl: ithe USSR would not,
for example, provide short-range surface-to-surface
missiles for use against targets in South Vietnam.
howeverl: they would provide such
equipment if there were an invasion of North Vietnam.
a 62Y-1)
14. The extent of the Soviet commitment to
the North Vietnamese is illustrated by the source's
report of the Soviet attitude toward a report that
the US was considering_ the mining or a blockade of
the port of Haiphong. L jthe
Czechoslovak minister of national defense was told
by high Soviet military officials that if these
measures were taken by the US that Soviet merchant
ships would be provided armed escorts and woula.
shoot their way through. The evidence offeredL
_77to support this statement conflicts sharply
with Ehe present judgment of the intelligence com-
munity and is undergoing extremely close scrutiny.
-6-
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
J
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747 11
I.SCc.)64)
Aid and Influence
15. Despite the significant role of the USSR
in providing assistance to North Vietnam there is
little evidence that the USSR exerts any influence
or leverage on North Vietnam's conduct of the war.
The North Vietnamese themselves have emphasized re-
peatedly that the strategic conduct of the war has
been purely Vietnamese in origin and nature.
16. This situation is confirmed byl:
jt The Soviets, for example, have had little suc-
cess in influencing North Vietnam to negotiate a
settlement of the war. Indeed, Soviet offers to in-
crease the type and quantity of assistaxi2e have been
refused. E ...the large
shadow of Communist China looms foremost in North
Vietnam's attitude toward foreign Communist powers.
Because of Chinese objections the North Vietnamese
have refused both Czechoslovak and Soviet offers
of military experts and have allowed only Soviet
missile experts to maintain an extended presence in
North Vietnam. This latter point to the best of
our knowledge is true.
17. On balance
any power has an inf uence over North Vietnam s
conduct of the war it is Communist China. E:
sulted3ith the Chinese before the Tet offensive.
the North Vietnamese may well have con-
At any rate t Ilreading of Soviet and Czech reac-
tions to the Tet offensive is that the high military
officials in these countries had no prior knowledge
of the event and took a rather sober view of the
whole affair.
ij if
�7�
p proved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
�������.�
..]
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
L
Table 1
Soviet-Military Aid Deliveries to North Vietnam
1965-1967 -
s (a)6.4)
Total Value
1965
1966 .
Zuantity
(Units)
(Million
us $)
Quantity
(Units)
(Million
us $)
At Foreign
Trade Prices
At Foreign
Trade Prices
210--
360
-
-=-=.
SAM Missile systems
72
77
Firing Battalions
15
66
lo.
_44_
Replacement Missiles
200
6
1,100
33
Aircraft
57
17
85
45
IL-28�light jet bomber
7
3
14I0-21 jet fighter
11
g
26
21
MIG-15/17 jet�fighter
32
4
42
.. 6
MI-6 Helicopter
6
_ 12
14I-4 Helicopter
3
1
7
1
U-MIG-15 jet trainer
3
Negl.
AN-24 Medium Transport
3
.3
1
2
IL-18 Heavy Transport
1967
(Million
USS)
,Zuantity At Foreign
(Units) Trade Prices
-4 c-= .
,4-_
17.g
==-__. _
_ . 5 22
3,810 _ . 114
. 15 12 .�
. 15 _ --.:
Armor .113 5 15 Negl. 123
T-54 medium tank 340 3 --4-5
T-34 medium tank 25
PT-76 amphibiouS tank 25 1 . 5 1-Tegl. 10
BTR-40 armored personnel
carrier 25 Hegl. 10 Negl. 40
BTR-50 armored personnel
carrier 3
ZSU-57 self-propelled gun 8 Negl.
SU-76 assault gun 30 Negl.
Artillery
100-mmAAA
85-mm AAA
-mm
57 AAA
37-mm AAA
14.5-mm AAA
Field artillery (76-152-mm)
Radar
Vehicles
Small arms add other
infantry weapons
Ammunition (metric tons)
1,1130
38
5
12
17 -
2
1
1
2160
_
--3
70
2,830
_ 50
5
- 2
- 25
NI.
_1
. 17
2
164
2,230
53
19
21 .
Ps
Negl.
5
2 .
=.
100
315
485
250
230
50
23
650
17,000
loo
55
735
1,850
50
40
_
465
590
850
100
225
89
850
79,000
400
40,000
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
Approved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
Table 2
Chinese Communist Military Aid Deliveries to North Vietnam
1965-1967
1965
(Million
US $)
Quantity At Foreign
(Units) Trade Prices
Total Value
Aircraft 8
MIG-15/17 jet fighter
Naval craft
Shanghai-class fast
patrol boat
P-6 class motor torpedo
boat
2
2
Armor 25
T-34 medium tank 25
Artillery 320
57-mm AAA 100
37-mm AAA 200
14.5-mm AAA
Field artillery (76-mm) 20
Radar
Vehicles
Small arms and other
infantry weapons
600
Ammunition (metric tons) 8,000
60
2
2-
1
1
6
W
2
Negl.
3
10
33
1966
(Million
use)
Quantity At Foreign
(Units) Trade Prices
2
2
140
100
40
400
10,000
95
--0
2
0
4
Negl.
2
35
41
1967
(Million
US $)
Quantity At Foreign
(Units) Trade Prices
6
6
645
100
120
425
67
700
24,000
pproved for Release: 2019/04/17 C00011747
150'
8
4
8
1
3
7
4
22